Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Time-Bin Phase-Encoding Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution with Four Single-Photon Detectors

Tang, Guang-Zhao, Sun, Shi-Hai, Chen, Huan, Li, Chun-Yan, Liang, Lin-Mei·2016·Chinese Physics Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0256-307x/33/12/120301

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Time-bin encoding has been proposed as a suitable scheme for quantum walks and photonic BosonSampling.

    “Besides quantum communication, timebin encoding has been proposed as a suitable scheme also for quantum walks [146-148] and for photonic BosonSampling [149, 150] (see Section 3.2).”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [147]

    The paper’s main text describes a time-bin phase-encoding scheme for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Searches for quantum walks and photonic BosonSampling found no passage addressing either proposed application, so our copy does not verify the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Bennett C H, IEEE, 175
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Huang Y X, 2008, Chin. Phys. Lett., 25, 2485, 10.1088/0256-307X/25/7/042 · DOI
  4. Yin Z Q, 2008, Chin. Phys. Lett., 25, 3547, 10.1088/0256-307X/25/10/008 · DOI
  5. 10.1063/1.2931070 · DOI
  6. Han J J, 2011, Chin. Phys. Lett., 28
  7. 10.1364/OL.37.001008 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042333 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.214 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.062331 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.110501 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.269 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.022304 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.070501 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130503 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130501 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130502 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.190503 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.190501 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.160502 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.062319 · DOI
  23. Lucio-Martinez I, 2009, New J. Phys., 11, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/9/095001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tang, G.-Z., Sun, S.-H., Chen, H., Li, C.-Y., & Liang, L.-M.
Venue
Chinese Physics Letters
Published
2016-12
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
120301
ISSN
  • 0256-307X
  • 1741-3540
Cited by
15
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review