CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 413

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution

Liu, Yang, Chen, Teng-Yun, Wang, Liu-Jun, Liang, Hao, Shentu, Guo-Liang, Wang, Jian, Cui, Ke, Yin, Hua-Lei, Liu, Nai-Le, Li, Li, Ma, Xiongfeng, Pelc, Jason S., Fejer, M. M., Peng, Cheng-Zhi, Zhang, Qiang, Pan, Jian-Wei·2013·Physical Review Letters
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.111.130502
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.111.130502

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variations of the NS gate have been reported: one proposal using only two beam splitters but with a slightly lower success probability of (3 - √2)/7; other schemes with two ancillary photons with success probabilities 1/5 and 1/4.

    “Variations of the NS gate have been reported: one proposal shows the possibility to implement it using only two BS but with slightly lower success probability of (3 -√ 2)/7 [123]; other schemes with again two ancillary photons with success probabilities 1/5 [124] and 1/4 [125].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [123]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. C. H. Bennett, 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing
  2. 10.1145/382780.382781 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.283.5410.2050 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441 · DOI · Paper page
  5. D. Gottesman, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 325, 10.26421/QIC4.5-1 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.093601 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.032302 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022313 · DOI
  9. B. Qi, 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput., 7, 073, 10.26421/QIC7.1-2-3 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032314 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042333 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.214 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/11/113026 · DOI
  14. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/7/073024 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.110501 · DOI
  16. D. Mayers, 1998, Proceedings of the FOCS, 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.120405 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130503 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.062319 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.2651 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s00453-002-0983-4 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1330 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.057901 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230503 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504 · DOI · Paper page
  26. A. Rubenok, 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 130501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130501 · DOI
  27. 10.1364/OE.19.021445 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.cose.2010.11.001 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.052305 · DOI
  30. H.-K. Lo, 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput., 7, 0431, 10.26421/QIC7.5-6-2 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.240502 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1364/OE.14.013073 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Y., Chen, T.-Y., Wang, L.-J., Liang, H., Shentu, G.-L., Wang, J., Cui, K., Yin, H.-L., Liu, N.-L., Li, L., Ma, X., Pelc, J. S., Fejer, M. M., Peng, C.-Z., Zhang, Q., & Pan, J.-W.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2013-09-23
Volume
111
Issue
13
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.111.130502
Cited by
413
References
1
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review