Cited by 103

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Black hole entropy as entanglement entropy: a holographic derivation

Emparan, Roberto·2006·Journal of High Energy Physics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/06/012

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In combination with the RT prescription, it readily follows that the area-entropy of black holes localized on an ETW brane is exactly equal to entanglement entropy, the minimal surface coincides with the bulk black hole horizon intersecting the brane.

    “In combination with the RT prescription, it readily follows that the area-entropy of black holes localized on an ETW brane is exactly equal to entanglement entropy [55] the minimal surface coincides with the bulk black hole horizon intersecting the brane.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [55]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.870 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/0375-9601(76)90178-X · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.666 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00678-5 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.2212 · DOI · Paper page
  6. J.M. Maldacena, 2003, J. High Energy Phys., 2003, 021, 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/021 · DOI · Paper page
  7. R. Brustein, 2006, J. High Energy Phys., 2006, 098, 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/098 · DOI
  8. S. Hawking, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 2001, 001, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/05/001 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.084017 · DOI · Paper page
  11. R. Emparan, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 007, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/007 · DOI · Paper page
  12. T. Tanaka, 2003, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 148, 307, 10.1143/PTPS.148.307 · DOI · Paper page
  13. R. Emparan, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., 2002, 043, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/043 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Emparan, R.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2006-06-08
Volume
2006
Issue
06
Pages
012-012
ISSN
1029-8479
Cited by
103
References
4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review