Cited by 57Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Deep learning fetal ultrasound video model match human observers in biometric measurements

Open access
Płotka, Szymon, Klasa, Adam, Lisowska, Aneta, Seliga-Siwecka, Joanna, Lipa, Michał, Trzciński, Tomasz, Sitek, Arkadiusz·2022·Physics in Medicine & Biology

Abstract

Objective. This work investigates the use of deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) to automatically perform measurements of fetal body parts, including head circumference, biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference and femur length, and to estimate gestational age and fetal weight using fetal ultrasound videos. Approach. We developed a novel multi-task CNN-based spatio-temporal fetal US feature extraction and standard plane detection algorithm (called FUVAI) and evaluated the method on 50 freehand fetal US video scans. We compared FUVAI fetal biometric measurements with measurements made by five experienced sonographers at two time points separated by at least two weeks. Intra- and inter-observer variabilities were estimated. Main results. We found that automated fetal biometric measurements obtained by FUVAI were comparable to the measurements performed by experienced sonographers The observed differences in measurement values were within the range of inter- and intra-observer variability. Moreover, analysis has shown that these differences were not statistically significant when comparing any individual medical expert to our model. Significance. We argue that FUVAI has the potential to assist sonographers who perform fetal biometric measurements in clinical settings by providing them with suggestions regarding the best measuring frames, along with automated measurements. Moreover, FUVAI is able perform these tasks in just a few seconds, which is a huge difference compared to the average of six minutes taken by sonographers. This is significant, given the shortage of medical experts capable of interpreting fetal ultrasound images in numerous countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4d85

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bano S, Dromey B, Vasconcelos F, Napolitano R, David A L, Peebles D M and Stoyanov D 2021 AutoFB: Automating Fetal Biometry Estimation from Standard Ultrasound Planes Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2021 ed M de Bruijne et al vol 12907 (Cham: Springer International Publishing) pp 228-38
  2. Płotka S, Włodarczyk T, Klasa A, Lipa M, Sitek A and Trzciński T 2021 FetalNet: Multi-task Deep Learning Framework For Fetal Ultrasound Biometric Measurements Neural Information Processing ed T Mantoro et al vol 1517 (Cham: Springer International Publishing) pp 257-65

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Płotka, S., Klasa, A., Lisowska, A., Seliga-Siwecka, J., Lipa, M., Trzciński, T., & Sitek, A.
Affiliations
  • Warsaw University of Technology (PL)
  • Fetai Health Ltd.
  • Sano – Centre for Computational Personalised Medicine International Research Foundation (PL)
  • Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Warsaw University of Technology
Venue
Physics in Medicine & Biology
Published
2022-02-16
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
045013
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W4205908798
Cited by
57
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (857533)
  • Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej (IRAP)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
prenatal ultrasound, automated measurement, gestational age estimation, fetal weight estimation, head circumference, biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, femur length, multi-task convolutional neural network, spatiotemporal feature extraction, observer variability
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Biometry, Female, Fetus, Gestational Age, Humans, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review