Cited by 66EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEpilepsy research and treatmentContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Non-invasive wearable seizure detection using long–short-term memory networks with transfer learning

Open access
Nasseri, Mona, Pal Attia, Tal, Joseph, Boney, Gregg, Nicholas M, Nurse, Ewan S, Viana, Pedro F, Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas, Dümpelmann, Matthias +4 more·2021·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Objective . The detection of seizures using wearable devices would improve epilepsy management, but reliable detection of seizures in an ambulatory environment remains challenging, and current studies lack concurrent validation of seizures using electroencephalography (EEG) data. Approach . An adaptively trained long–short-term memory deep neural network was developed and trained using a modest number of seizure data sets from wrist-worn devices. Transfer learning was used to adapt a classifier that was initially trained on intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) signals to facilitate classification of non-EEG physiological datasets comprising accelerometry, blood volume pulse, skin electrodermal activity, heart rate, and temperature signals. The algorithm’s performance was assessed with and without pre-training on iEEG signals and transfer learning. To assess the performance of the seizure detection classifier using long-term ambulatory data, wearable devices were used for multiple months with an implanted neurostimulator capable of recording iEEG signals, which provided independent electrographic seizure detections that were reviewed by a board-certified epileptologist. Main results . For 19 motor seizures from 10 in-hospital patients, the algorithm yielded a mean area under curve (AUC), a sensitivity, and an false alarm rate per day (FAR/day) of 0.98, 0.93, and 2.3, respectively. Additionally, for eight seizures with probable motor semiology from two ambulatory patients, the classifier achieved a mean AUC of 0.97 and an FAR of 2.45 events/day at a sensitivity of 0.9. For all seizure types in the ambulatory setting, the classifier had a mean AUC of 0.82 with a sensitivity of 0.47 and an FAR of 7.2 events/day. Significance . The performance of the algorithm was evaluated using motor and non-motor seizures during in-hospital and ambulatory use. The classifier was able to detect multiple types of motor and non-motor seizures, but performed significantly better on motor seizures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/abef8a

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A clean BVP signal from the Empatica E4 without noise from motion artifacts has a smooth quasi-periodic signature, which can be separated from random noise or motion artifacts by analyzing the entropy of the signal spectrum.

    “A clean BVP signal from the Empatica E4 without noise from motion artifacts has a smooth quasi-periodic signature, which can be separated from random noise or, more importantly, from motion artifacts by analyzing the entropy of the signal spectrum.”

    From Data quality evaluation in wearable monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nasseri, M., Pal Attia, T., Joseph, B., Gregg, N. M., Nurse, E. S., Viana, P. F., Schulze-Bonhage, A., Dümpelmann, M., Worrell, G., Freestone, D. R., Richardson, M. P., & Brinkmann, B. H.
Affiliations
  • University of North Florida (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Brinkmann, Benjamin H
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2021-04-08
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
056017
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W3137217840
Cited by
66
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of North Florida Digital Commons (University of North Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Epilepsy Foundation (Epilepsy Innovation Institute My Seizure Gauge)
  • American Epilepsy Society (Research & Training Fellowship for Clinicians (N.M)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
seizure detection, epilepsy, wearable devices, long short-term memory networks, transfer learning, intracranial EEG, ambulatory EEG, motor seizures, accelerometry, blood volume pulse, electrodermal activity, heart rate, implanted neurostimulator, false alarm rate
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Wearable Electronic Devices, Algorithms, Electroencephalography, Humans, Seizures, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review