CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 70EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyEmotion and Mood Recognition

A New Generation of Brain-Computer Interface Based on Riemannian Geometry

Open access
Congedo, Marco, Barachant, Alexandre, Andreev, Anton·2013·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1310.8115arXiv 1310.8115
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Based on the cumulated experience over the past 25 years in the field of Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) we can now envision a new generation of BCI. Such BCIs will not require training; instead they will be smartly initialized using remote massive databases and will adapt to the user fast and effectively in the first minute of use. They will be reliable, robust and will maintain good performances within and across sessions. A general classification framework based on recent advances in Riemannian geometry and possessing these characteristics is presented. It applies equally well to BCI based on event-related potentials (ERP), sensorimotor (mu) rhythms and steady-state evoked potential (SSEP). The framework is very simple, both algorithmically and computationally. Due to its simplicity, its ability to learn rapidly (with little training data) and its good across-subject and across-session generalization, this strategy a very good candidate for building a new generation of BCIs, thus we hereby propose it as a benchmark method for the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1310.8115

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rationale of EA is to make the data distributions from different subjects more similar, so that a classifier trained on auxiliary data has a better chance to perform well on the new subject.

    “The rationale is to make the data distributions from different subjects more similar, and hence a classifier trained on the auxiliary data would have a better chance to perform well on the new subject.”

    From Transfer Learning for Brain–Computer Interfaces: A Euclidean Space Data Alignment Approach (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Smart Initialization section (p. 9) describes using data from other individuals to initialize a classifier for a new user, supporting the cross-subject transfer-learning part. But the paper does not describe EA or say that making subjects’ data distributions more similar is the rationale for improved transfer; its reported method is a Riemannian classifier. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • CORAL minimizes domain shift by aligning the second-order statistics of different distributions without requiring any target labels.

    “A ' frustratingly easy domain adaptation ' approach, CORrelation ALignment (CORAL) [30], was proposed in 2016 to minimize domain shift by aligning the second-order statistics of different distributions, without requiring any target labels.”

    From Transfer Learning for Brain–Computer Interfaces: A Euclidean Space Data Alignment Approach (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Universal MDM BCI Classifier section (p. 8) describes classification using covariance matrices and Riemannian distance, while Adaptation (p. 9) discusses combining MDM classifiers. Searches for CORAL, correlation alignment, and unlabeled-target distribution alignment found no passage addressing the attributed method or its 2016 proposal. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Allison BZ, Dunne S, Leeb R, Millán JdR, Nijolt A (2012) Toward Practical Brain-Computer Interfaces (Eds.), Springer, London.
  2. Barachant A, Bonnet S, Congedo M, Jutten C (2012a) Multi-Class Brain Computer Interface Classification by Riemannian Geometry, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 59(4), 920928.
  3. Barachant A, Bonnet S, Congedo M, Jutten C (2012b) BCI Signal Classification using a Riemannianbased kernel, ESANN Conference, Bruges, Belgium..
  4. Barachant A, Bonnet S, Congedo M, Jutten C (2011a) Réalisation d'un Brain-Switch EEG par Géométrie Riemannienne, GRETSI conference, Bordeax, France.
  5. Barachant A, Congedo M (2014) A Robust and Efficient Method for Single Trial Classification of ERP Using Information Geometry. IEEE Trans Biom Eng, in press.
  6. Barachant A, Congedo M, Van Veen G, Jutten C (2013) Classification de potentiels évoqués P300 par géométrie riemannienne, GRETSI Proceedings, in press.
  7. Bonnet L, Lotte F, Lécuyer A (2013) Two Brains, One Game: Design and Evaluation of a Multi-User BCI Video Game Based on Motor Imagery, IEEE Trans on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games.
  8. Colwell K, Throckmorton C, Collins L, Morton K (2013) Transfer Learning for Accelerated P300 Speller Classifier Training, Proc. Fifth Int. BCI Meeting, June 3-7, Pacific grove, California. ID: 004.
  9. Congedo M, Phlypo R, Chatel-Goldman J (2012) Orthogonal and Non-Orthogonal Joint Blind Source Separation in the Least-Squares Sense, 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 1885-9.
  10. Gouy-Pailler C, Congedo M, Brunner C, Jutten C, Pfurtscheller G (2010) Nonstationary brain source separation for multiclass motor imagery, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 57(2), 46978.
  11. Herweg A, Kaufmann T, Kübler A (2013) Using Generic Models to Improve Tactile ERO-BCI performance of Low Aptitude Users. Proc. Fifth Int. BCI Meeting, June 3-7, Pacific grove, California. ID: 097.
  12. Lee JS, Park KS (2013) A New Stimulation Method of Virtual Speller for Simultaneous P300 and SSVEP Responses. Proc. Fifth Int. BCI Meeting, June 3-7, Pacific grove, California. ID: 162
  13. Li Y-O, Adali T, Wang W, Calhoun VD (2009), Joint blind source separation by multi-set canonical correlation analysis, IEEE Trans. Signal Process, 57(10), 3918-29.
  14. Li Y, Wong KM, De Bruin H (2012) EEG signals classification for sleep-state decision - A Riemannian geometry approach, IET Signal Processing, 6(4), 288-299.
  15. Mainsah BO, Collins LM, Colwell K, Throckmorton CS (2013) Improving Dynamic Data Collection in P300 Spellers With a Language Model. Proc. Fifth Int. BCI Meeting, June 3-7, Pacific grove, California. ID: 107.
  16. Moakher M (2005) A differential geometric approach to the arithmetic and geometric means of operators in some symmetric spaces. SIAM. J. Matrix Anal. Appl, 26 (3), 735-747.
  17. Obeid I, Picone J. (2013) Bringing Big Data to neural Interfaces. Proc. Fifth Int. BCI Meeting, June 37, Pacific grove, California. ID: 180
  18. Schettini F, Aloise F, Aricò P, Salinari S, Di Mattia D, Cincotti F (2013) Self-Calibration in an Asynchronous P300-Based BCI. Proc. Fifth Int. BCI Meeting, June 3-7, Pacific grove, California. ID: 124.
  19. Schultze-Kraft, Görgen K, Wenzel M, Haynes J-D, Blankertz B (2013) Cooperating Brains: Joint Control of a Dual-BCI. Proc. Fifth Int. BCI Meeting, June 3-7, Pacific grove, California. ID: 046.
  20. Tan DS, Nijholt A (2012) Brain-Computer Interfaces (Eds.), Springer, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Congedo, M., Barachant, A., & Andreev, A.
Affiliations
  • GIPSA-Lab (FR)
  • Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1310.8115
arXiv
1310.8115
OpenAlex
W2222723867
Cited by
69
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
brain-computer interface, Riemannian geometry, EEG classification, event-related potentials, mu rhythm, steady-state evoked potentials, cross-subject generalization, cross-session generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review