Cited by 106Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactFood Waste Reduction and SustainabilityEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

An assessment of individual foodprints attributed to diets and food waste in the United States

Open access
Birney, Catherine I, Franklin, Katy F, Davidson, F Todd, Webber, Michael E·2017·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

This paper assesses the environmental impacts of the average American's diet and food loss and waste (FLW) habits through an analysis of energy, water, land, and fertilizer requirements (inputs) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (outputs). We synthesized existing datasets to determine the ramifications of the typical American adult's food habits, as well as the environmental impact associated with shifting diets to meet the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) dietary guideline recommendations. In 2010, FLW accounted for 35% of energy use, 34% of blue water use, 34% of GHG emissions, 31% of land use, and 35% of fertilizer use related to an individual's food-related resource consumption, i.e. their foodprint . A shift in consumption towards a healthier diet, combined with meeting the USDA and Environmental Protection Agency's 2030 food loss and waste reduction goal could increase per capita food related energy use 12%, decrease blue water consumption 4%, decrease green water use 23%, decrease GHG emissions from food production 11%, decrease GHG emissions from landfills 20%, decrease land use 32%, and increase fertilizer use 12%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8494

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observed differences between the present study's estimates and Birney et al.'s could be explained by Birney et al. including retail food loss and waste and not accounting for multi-use crops and multi-use cropland.

    “In contrast to our analysis, Birney et al. included retail food loss and waste in their analysis and did not account for multi-use crops (i.e., crops that are used to produce multiple products from equivalent mass) and multi-use cropland (cropland used to produce multiple crops during different parts of the year), both of which could explain the observed differences in results.”
  • The present study's estimates of cropland and fertilizer used to produce wasted food were lower than Birney et al.'s estimates (61 million acres and 8.7 billion pounds).

    “Our estimates of cropland and fertilizer used to produce wasted food were also lower than Birney et al. (61 million acres of cropland and 8.7 billion pounds of fertilizer),[51]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bloom J 2010 American Wasteland (Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birney, C. I., Franklin, K. F., Davidson, F. T., & Webber, M. E.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Birney, Catherine I
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2017-10-01
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
105008
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765323761
Cited by
106
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  • Dairy Management
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
food loss and waste, diet, greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption, land use, fertilizer use, energy consumption, dietary guidelines, food waste reduction, landfill emissions, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review