Cited by 73Spacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesSuperconducting Materials and ApplicationsRocket and propulsion systems research

Zero boil-off methods for large-scale liquid hydrogen tanks using integrated refrigeration and storage

Open access
Notardonato, W U, Swanger, A M, Fesmire, J E, Jumper, K M, Johnson, W L, Tomsik, T M·2017·IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

Abstract

NASA has completed a series of tests at the Kennedy Space Center to demonstrate the capability of using integrated refrigeration and storage (IRAS) to remove energy from a liquid hydrogen (LH2) tank and control the state of the propellant.A primary test objective was the keeping and storing of the liquid in a zero boil-off state, so that the total heat leak entering the tank is removed by a cryogenic refrigerator with an internal heat exchanger.The LH2 is therefore stored and kept with zero losses for an indefinite period of time.The LH2 tank is a horizontal cylindrical geometry with a vacuum-jacketed, multilayer insulation system and a capacity of 125,000 liters.The closed-loop helium refrigeration system was a Linde LR1620 capable of 390W cooling at 20K (without any liquid nitrogen pre-cooling).Three different control methods were used to obtain zero boil-off: temperature control of the helium refrigerant, refrigerator control using the tank pressure sensor, and duty cycling (on/off) of the refrigerator as needed.Summarized are the IRAS design approach, zero boil-off control methods, and results of the series of zero boil-off tests.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1757-899x/278/1/012012

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For Figure 4b, the measured temperature from sensor TT10 was lower than that estimated because the liquid also thermally stratified.

    “For Figure 4b, sensor TT10, located at the 61% fill level [78], was closest to the vapor liquid interface (approximately 13 cm below); the measured temperature was lower tha”

    From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [75]

    Section 5 (page unavailable) reports liquid-temperature stratification and mentions TT10 in a 67% fill-level test. It does not identify TT10 as being at the 61% fill level or 13 cm below the interface, nor does it compare TT10’s measured temperature with an estimate or attribute such a difference to stratification. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This tank incorporates an Integrated Refrigeration and Storage (IRAS) system, which maintains the liquid in a zero boil-off state through the use of an internal cryogenic heat exchanger connected to an external Brayton cycle refrigerator.

    “This tank incorporates an Integrated Refrigeration and Storage (IRAS) system [75], which maintains the liquid in a zero boil-off state through the use of an internal cryogenic heat exchanger connected to an external Brayton cycle refrigerator.”

    From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Notardonato, W. U., Swanger, A. M., Fesmire, J. E., Jumper, K. M., Johnson, W. L., & Tomsik, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Kennedy Space Center (US)
  • Glenn Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Notardonato, W U
Venue
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Published
2017-12
Volume
278
Pages
012012
ISSN
  • 1757-8981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-899X
OpenAlex
W2739036736
Cited by
73
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Superconducting Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Rocket and propulsion systems research
Keywords
liquid hydrogen storage, zero boil-off, cryocooler, helium refrigeration, multilayer insulation, cryogenic propellant storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review