CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 133

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A homodyne detector integrated onto a photonic chip for measuring quantum states and generating random numbers

Raffaelli, Francesco, Ferranti, Giacomo, Mahler, Dylan H, Sibson, Philip, Kennard, Jake E, Santamato, Alberto, Sinclair, Gary, Bonneau, Damien, Thompson, Mark G, Matthews, Jonathan C F·2018·Quantum Science and Technology
DOI 10.1088/2058-9565/aaa38f
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2058-9565/aaa38f

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Si-photonic quantum processor able to initialize, operate and analyse arbitrary two-qubit states and processes was demonstrated by adopting a linear-combination scheme, and achieved an average quantum process fidelity of ∼93%.

    “In Fig.4c , a Si-photonic quantum processor able to initialize, operate and analyse arbitrary two-qubit states and processes, was demonstrated by adopting a linear-combination scheme [81]. The device was programmed to implement 98 different logic gates (e.g., CNOT, CZ, CH and SWAP), and achieved an average quantum process fidelity of ∼ 93%.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [81]

  • A universal two-qubit quantum processor was realised in a re-programmable Si-chip that monolithically integrates 4 SFWM-SPSs, 58 TOPSs and 82 MMIs, and was re-programmed to implement 98 two-qubit operations with high fidelities and multiple algorithms.

    “a universal two-qubit quantum processor is realised in a re-programmable Si-chip, which monolithically integrates 4 SFWM-SPSs, 58 TOPSs and 82 MMIs. The device was re-programmed to implement 98 two-qubit operations with high fidelities, and multiple algorithms were implemented.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [81]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.2847 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/387471a0 · DOI
  3. 10.1364/OE.15.007940 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.110801 · DOI
  5. Rahimi-Keshari S, 2011, New J. Phys., 13, 10.1088/1367-2630/13/1/013006 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.130403 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/ncomms1122 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.1155441 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2573218 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.178 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.3.044005 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000362 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.42 · DOI
  14. 10.1364/OE.21.032680 · DOI
  15. 10.1364/OE.22.011279 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.299 · DOI
  17. 10.1117/12.2076262"10.1117/12.2076262 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.035802 · DOI
  19. 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-016-0045-5 · DOI
  20. Esposito M, 2014, New J. Phys., 16, 10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/043004 · DOI
  21. 10.1063/1.5004561 · DOI
  22. Huang D, 2013, Chin. Phys. Lett., 30
  23. Lvovsky A I, 2004, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 6, S556, 10.1088/1464-4266/6/6/014 · DOI
  24. 10.1063/1.3597793 · DOI
  25. 10.1063/1.4922417 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1364/OE.24.027475 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.197 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1080/09500349414552281 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000989 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.031056 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/ncomms13984 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1364/OPTICA.4.000172 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Raffaelli, F., Ferranti, G., Mahler, D. H., Sibson, P., Kennard, J. E., Santamato, A., Sinclair, G., Bonneau, D., Thompson, M. G., & Matthews, J. C. F.
ORCID
Venue
Quantum Science and Technology
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2018-02-07
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
025003
ISSN
2058-9565
DOI
10.1088/2058-9565/aaa38f
Cited by
133
References
5
Licence
Funders
  • ERC
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L024020/1, EP/M013472/1, EP/M024385/1)
  • QUCHIP
  • US Army Research Office (ARO) (W911NF-14-1-0133)
  • PIQUE
  • BBOI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review