Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Performance Evaluation of the MiniMed® Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During Patient Home Use

Gross, Todd M., Bode, Bruce W., Einhorn, Daniel, Kayne, David M., Reed, John H., White, Neil H., Mastrototaro, John J.·2000·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recent availability of a continuous glucose monitor offers the opportunity to match the demands of intensive diabetes management with a period of equally intensive blood glucose monitoring. The present study evaluates the performance of the MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in patients with diabetes during home use. METHODS: Performance data and demographic information were obtained from 135 patients who were (mean +/- SD) 40.5+/-14.5 years old, had an average duration of diabetes of 18.0+/-9.8 years, 50% were female, 90% were Caucasian, and 87% of whom had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Patients were selected by their physician, trained on the use of the CGMS and wore the device at home for 3 days or more. The performance of the CGMS was evaluated against blood glucose measurements obtained using each patient's home blood glucose meter. Evaluation statistics included correlation, linear regression, mean difference and percent absolute difference scores, and Clarke error grid analysis. RESULTS: The CGMS values were compared to 2477 SMBG tests (r = 0.91, slope = 0.93, intercept = 14.5 mg/dL, mean absolute difference = 18.0%+/-19.8%). Clarke error grid analysis showed 96.2% of the data pairs falling within the clinically acceptable regions (zones A and B). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the agreement of the CGMS to blood glucose meter values, under conditions of home use, in patients selected by their physicians as candidates for continuous monitoring. The detailed glucose information provided by the CGMS should make successful management of diabetes more easily achieved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/152091500316737

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Gross, T. M., Bode, B. W., Einhorn, D., Kayne, D. M., Reed, J. H., White, N. H., & Mastrototaro, J. J.
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2000-05
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
49-56
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W2004749714
Cited by
303
References
3
FWCI
10.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Evaluation of the MiniMed® Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During Patient Home Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/152091500316737
The paper
Gross, T. M., Bode, B. W., Einhorn, D., Kayne, D. M., Reed, J. H., White, N. H., & Mastrototaro, J. J. (2000). Performance Evaluation of the MiniMed® Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During Patient Home Use. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1089/152091500316737

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.