Cited by 102Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGender and Technology in Education

The Association between Internet Addiction and Belief of Frustration Intolerance: The Gender Difference

Ko, Chih-Hung, Yen, Ju-Yu, Yen, Cheng-Fang, Chen, Chung-Sheng, Wang, Shing-Yaw·2008·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

This study evaluated the association between Internet addiction and frustration intolerance, the gender difference of frustration intolerance, and the gender differences of the association between Internet addiction and frustration intolerance. Participants were 2,114 students (1,204 male and 910 female) who were recruited to complete the Chen Internet Addiction Scale and Frustration Discomfort scale. Females had higher scores on the subscale of entitlement and emotional intolerance and the total scale of the frustration intolerance. There was a significant gender difference on the association between Internet addiction and frustration intolerance. The association was higher in male adolescents. Regression analysis revealed male adolescents with Internet addiction had higher intolerance to frustration of entitlement and emotional discomfort, and female adolescents with it had higher intolerance to emotional discomfort and lower tolerance to frustration of achievement. Frustration intolerance should be evaluated for adolescents with Internet addiction, especially for males. Rational emotive behavior therapy focusing on different irrational beliefs should be provided to male and female adolescents with Internet addiction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cpb.2007.0095

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ko, C.-H., Yen, J.-Y., Yen, C.-F., Chen, C.-S., & Wang, S.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (TW)
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2008-06
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
273-278
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W2038060901
Cited by
102
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
internet addiction, frustration intolerance, gender differences, adolescents, entitlement, Chen Internet Addiction Scale, rational emotive behavior therapy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Culture, Emotions, Female, Frustration, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Students, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Behavior, Addictive, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review