The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus? Examining Gender Differences in Self-Presentation on Social Networking Sites
Abstract
Psychological research on gender differences in self-presentation has already revealed that women place higher priority on creating a positive self-presentation, while men are less concerned about the image they present in face-to-face (ftf) communication. Nowadays, with the extensive use of new media, self-presentation is no longer so closely tied to ftf situations, but can also take place in the online world. Specifically, social networking sites (SNS), such as Facebook or MySpace, offer various features such as profile pictures, groups, and virtual bulletin boards with which users can create elaborated online representations of themselves. What remains open is whether this virtual self-presentation on SNS is subject to gender differences. Based on studies emphasizing gender-related differences in Internet communication and behavior in general, it can be assumed that men and women have different motives regarding their SNS usage as well. A multimethodological study, combining results of an online survey and a content analysis of 106 user profiles, assessed users' diverse motives for participating in SNS in general, and their use of specific profile elements or self-presentation in particular. In this sample of StudiVZ users, women tend to be more likely to use SNS for comparing themselves with others and for searching for information. Men, on the other hand, are more likely to look at other people's profiles to find friends. Moreover, women tend to use group names for their self-presentation and prefer adding portrait photos to their profiles, while men choose full-body shots.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prior research has shown that females spent more time looking at the SNS pages of same-sex others (e.g., McAndrew & Jeong, 2012), are more likely to use SNSs for comparing themselves with others (e.g., Haferkamp, Eimler, Papadakis, & Kruck, 2012), and report greater levels of body dissatisfaction (e.g., Bearman et al., 2006).”
From The reciprocal and indirect relationships between passive Facebook use, comparison on Facebook, and adolescents' body dissatisfaction (2017) · cites this paper as Haferkamp et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“First, most studies on SNSs focus predominantly on its affordances for communication, such as impression management and formation (Haferkamp, Eimler, Papadakis, & Kruck, 2012;Van Der Heide, Angelo, & Schumaker, 2012).Not many have examined the darker side of SNSs use (Arcy, Gupta, Tarafdar, & Turel, 2014;Tarafdar, Gupta, & Turel, 2013), particularly in the context of unpacking why adolescents use”
From Till logout do us part? Comparison of factors predicting excessive social network sites use and addiction between Singaporean adolescents and adults (2017) · cites this paper as Haferkamp et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Southwestern Social Science Association (2010) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/(issn)1540-6237 · Cited by 13,619
Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet
Turkle, S. (1997) · Cited by 6,340
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2 · Cited by 1,826
Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0056 · Cited by 1,577
The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1010 · Cited by 1,548
Can You See the Real Me? Activation and Expression of the “True Self” on the Internet
Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00247 · Cited by 1,301
Drüke, H. (1986) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-95522-7_29 · Cited by 1,279
Narcissism and social networking web sites
Buffardi, L. E., & Campbell, W. K. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208320061 · Cited by 1,159
Papacharissi, Z. (2004) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444804041444 · Cited by 1,158
Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites
Tüfekçi, Z. (2007) · Bulletin of Science Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467607311484 · Cited by 946
Krämer (2008) · doi:10.1027/1864-1105.20.3.106 · Cited by 883
Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S.-Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00312.x · Cited by 769
The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating
Symons, D. K., & Buss, D. M. (1994) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353621 · Cited by 768
Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender*
Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x · Cited by 734
Self-presentation and gender on MySpace
Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.001 · Cited by 724
Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching
Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1023/a:1010937901821 · Cited by 709
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650205285368 · Cited by 701
Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model.
Feingold, A. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.125 · Cited by 525
Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet 1
Bimber, B. (2000) · Social Science Quarterly · Cited by 494
Sex differences in same-sex friendship
Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1982) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/bf00287568 · Cited by 491
The Presentation of Self in Virtual Life: Characteristics of Personal Home Pages
Papacharissi, Z. (2002) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769900207900307 · Cited by 350
Gender and Emotion: Beyond Stereotypes
Brody, L. R. (1997) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02448.x · Cited by 317
The truth about lying in online dating profiles
Hancock, J. T., Toma, C. L., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240697 · Cited by 277
Gender and Power in On‐line Communication
Herring, S. C. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470756942.ch9 · Cited by 247
The Self Online: The Utility of Personal Home Pages
Papacharissi, Z. (2002) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4603_3 · Cited by 242
Gender and Power in Online Communication
Herring, S. C. (2001) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) · Cited by 206
Jung, T., Youn, H., & McClung, S. R. (2007) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9996 · Cited by 169
The Inexpressive Male: Tragedy or Sexual Politics?
Sattel, J. W. (1976) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/799856 · Cited by 148
Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendship
Williams, D. (1985) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/bf00288179 · Cited by 119
Factors affecting Internet use in a saturated-access population
Busselle, R. W., Reagan, J., Pinkleton, B. E., & Jackson, K. (1999) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/s0736-5853(99)00018-0 · Cited by 93
Women's and Men's Nonverbal Communication: Similarities, Differences, Stereotypes, and Origins
Hall, J. A. (2006) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412976152.n11 · Cited by 89
(1996) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00384.x · Cited by 79
Ebo, B. L. (1998) · Greenwood Publishing Group Inc. eBooks · doi:10.5040/9798216188025 · Cited by 78
Dolgin, K. G., & Minowa, N. (1997) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/bf02766653 · Cited by 43
The Inexpressive Male: Tragedy or Sexual Politics?
Sattel, J. W. (1976) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.1976.23.4.03a00090 · Cited by 21
Doing and undoing gender in a Swedish Internet community
Elm, M. S. (2007) · Cited by 18
Cyberfeminism in Northern lights : Gender and digital media in a Nordic context
Elm, M. S., & Sundén, J. (2007) · Cited by 12
Haferkamp, N., & Krämer, N. C. (2009) · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Katz E, , Blumler J, , Gurevitch M. 1974. The use of mass communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Banczyk B, , Krämer NC, , Senokozlieva M. 2008. “The wurst” meets “fatless” in MySpace. The relationship between personality, nationality and self-presentation in an online community. Paper presented at the ICA, May 2008 Montreal, Canada.
- Haferkamp N, , Krämer NC. 2010. Creating a digital self. Impression management and impression formation on social networking sites. Drotner K, , Schrøder KC. Digital content creation: creativity, competence, critique. New York: Peter Lang, 129–146.
- Ellison NB Heino RD Gibbs JL. Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2006; 11:2. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html. 2007 July 21. · DOI · Paper page
- Backhaus K, , Plinke W, , Erichson B. 2006. Multivariate Analysemethoden—Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. [Multivariate methods of analyses—An application-oriented introduction] Berlin: Springer.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,009
Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.007 · Cited by 841
Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439314567449 · Cited by 519
Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder
Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2016) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009 · Cited by 509
Thorisdottir, I. E., Sigurvinsdottir, R., Asgeirsdottir, B. B., Allegrante, J. P., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2019) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2019.0079 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A.-M., & Kruck, J. V.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- University of Münster (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Haferkamp, Nina
- ORCID
- Eimler, Sabrina C.
- Venue
- Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-98
- ISSN
- 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 2152-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2014764430
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 34.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- gender differences, self-presentation, social networking sites, online self-presentation, StudiVZ, Facebook, MySpace, motivations for social media use, self-comparison
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Social Perception, Young Adult, Social Networking, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review