Cited by 1,009Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesEating Disorders and BehaviorsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women's body image concerns and mood

Open access
Fardouly, Jasmine, Diedrichs, Phillippa C., Vartanian, Lenny R., Halliwell, Emma·2015·Body Image

Abstract

The present study experimentally investigated the effect of Facebook usage on women's mood and body image, whether these effects differ from an online fashion magazine, and whether appearance comparison tendency moderates any of these effects. Female participants (N=112) were randomly assigned to spend 10min browsing their Facebook account, a magazine website, or an appearance-neutral control website before completing state measures of mood, body dissatisfaction, and appearance discrepancies (weight-related, and face, hair, and skin-related). Participants also completed a trait measure of appearance comparison tendency. Participants who spent time on Facebook reported being in a more negative mood than those who spent time on the control website. Furthermore, women high in appearance comparison tendency reported more facial, hair, and skin-related discrepancies after Facebook exposure than exposure to the control website. Given its popularity, more research is needed to better understand the impact that Facebook has on appearance concerns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12.002

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Body dissatisfaction is often a result of young women's upward social comparisons of their own appearance with the appearance of other young women in real life or in a (social) media context.

    “It is often found that body dissatisfaction is a result of young women ' s upward social comparisons of their own appearance with the appearance of other young women in real life or in a (social) media context (e.g., Dittmar & Howard, 2004; Fardouly, Diedrichs, Vartanian, Halliwell, 2015; Fardouly & Vartanian, 2015; Mabe, Forney, & Keel, 2014; Tiggemann & Miller, 2010; Tiggemann &a”

    From Picture Perfect: The Direct Effect of Manipulated Instagram Photos on Body Image in Adolescent Girls (2018) · cites this paper as Fardouly, Diedrichs, Vartanian, Halliwell, 2015

  • For women high in social comparison tendencies, exposure to their Facebook feed predicted greater dissatisfaction with their own face, hair, and skin.

    “for women high in social comparison tendencies, exposure to their Facebook feed predicted greater dissatisfaction with their own face, hair, and skin (Fardouly et al., 2015).”
  • In an experimental study with British young women aged 17-25, participants assigned to browse their Facebook feed reported significantly worse mood following this exposure than a control group.

    “In an experimental study with British young women aged 17-25, participants who were assigned to browse their Facebook feed reported significantly worse mood following this exposure than a control group”
  • Research that examines adolescents' exposure to their own social media feeds may not be equipped to differentiate between the effects of viewing known peer, unknown same-aged peer, celebrity, and influencer images.

    “Thus, research that examines adolescents' exposure to their own SM feeds (e.g., Fardouly et al., 2015; Steinsbekk et al., 2021) may not be equipped to differentiate between the effects of viewing known peer, unknown same-aged peer, celebrity, and influencer images.”
  • Several studies included in the current review provide preliminary empirical support for individual-level moderators that should be investigated in future work, such as social comparison tendencies, investment in appearance, sensitivity to peer feedback, and levels of imaginary audience ideation.

    “Several studies included in the current review provide preliminary empirical support for individual-level moderators that should be investigated in future work, such as social comparison tendencies (Fardouly et al., 2015; Kleemans et al., 2018), investment in appearance (Lonergan et al., 2020; Nesi et al., 2021), sensitivity to peer feedback (Lee et al., 2020), and levels of imaginary audience ide”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Fardouly, Jasmine
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
13
Pages
38-45
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015151714
Cited by
1,009
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 151 · 2025: 181 · 2024: 149 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 10
FWCI
58.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
Facebook, social media, body dissatisfaction, mood, young women, weight concern
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Body Image, Female, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Women, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review