The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Psychological Benefits of Being Authentic on Facebook
Abstract
Having others acknowledge and validate one's true self is associated with better psychological health. Existing research indicates that an individual's true self may be more readily expressed on Facebook than in person. This study brought together these two premises by investigating for the first time the psychosocial outcomes associated with communicating one's true self on Facebook. Participants ( n = 164) completed a personality assessment once as their true self and once as the self they present on Facebook (Facebook self), as well as measures of social connectedness, subjective well-being, depression, anxiety, and stress. Euclidean distances quantified the difference between one's true self and the Facebook self. Hypotheses received partial support. Better coherence between the true self and the Facebook self was associated with better social connectedness and less stress. Two models provided evidence of mediation effects. Findings highlight that authentic self-presentation on Facebook can be associated with positive psychological outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Grieve and Watkinson (2016) showed that in Facebook, only authentic self-representation was associated to wellbeing”
From Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience (2018) · cites this paper as Grieve and Watkinson (2016)
In the citing paper
“while lack of authenticity was related to stress and lower wellbeing”
From Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience (2018) · cites this paper as Grieve and Watkinson (2016)
Citations
Cites
Measuring belongingness: The Social Connectedness and the Social Assurance scales.
Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1995) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.232 · Cited by 1,484
Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.3.385 · Cited by 1,237
Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on facebook
Mehdizadeh, S. (2010) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0257 · Cited by 1,064
Lee, R. M., Draper, M., & Lee, S. (2001) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.310 · Cited by 867
Face-to-face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online?
Grieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., Anne Tolan, G., & Marrington, J. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017 · Cited by 609 · cited 3×
“Social networking sites (SNSs) such as Facebook afford individuals who feel uncomfortable in face-to-face situations the opportunity to communicate with others within a more accessible social medium (e.g., Indian and Grieve 11 and Grieve et al. 12 ) and permit users to have greater control over the way in which they p…”
InfluentialSelf-citationForest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611429709 · Cited by 547
Pugh, S. D., Groth, M., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021395 · Cited by 350
Indian, M., & Grieve, R. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.016 · Cited by 170
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- McKenna KYA. (2007) Through the Internet looking glass: expressing and validating the true self. In Johnson A, , McKenna KYA, , Postmes T, ,. Reips UD, eds. The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 205–221.
- 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.052 · DOI
- Rogers C. (1951) Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
- Baumeister RF. (1998. The self. In Gilbert DT, , Fiske ST, , Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of social psychology. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 680–740.
- Goldman BM, , Kernis MH. The role of authenticity in healthy psychological functioning and subjective well-being. Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association, 2002; 5:18–20.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1380 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jcc4.12103 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00223890902935878 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · DOI · Paper page
- Lovibond SH, , Lovibond PF. (1995) Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. 2nd ed. Sydney, Australia: Psychology Foundation.
- 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.018 · DOI
- 10.3109/00048674.2010.529604 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/01612840.2011.632708 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1027/1864-1105.20.3.106 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.034 · DOI
- Beck AT. (1967) Depression: clinical experimental and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper and Row.
- 10.1037/0021-843X.116.2.313 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience
Peters, D., Calvo, R. A., & Ryan, R. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797 · Cited by 888
Social media use and mental health among young adults
Berryman, C., Ferguson, C. J., & Negy, C. (2018) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11126-017-9535-6 · Cited by 484
Self-disclosure and social media: Motivations, mechanisms and psychological well-being
Luo, M., & Hancock, J. T. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.019 · Cited by 374
Hancock, J., Liu, S. X., Luo, M., & Mieczkowski, H. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4053961 · Cited by 101
Like this meta-analysis: Screen media and mental health.
Ferguson, C. J., Kaye, L. K., Branley-Bell, D., Markey, P., Ivory, J. D., Klisanin, D., Elson, M., Smyth, M., Hogg, J. L., McDonnell, D., et al. (2022) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/pro0000426 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Grieve, R., & Watkinson, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania
- Venue
- Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 420-425
- ISSN
- 2152-2715
- 2152-2723
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 8
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Psychological Benefits of Being Authentic on Facebook. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/cyber.2016.0010
- The paper
- Grieve, R., & Watkinson, J. (2016). The Psychological Benefits of Being Authentic on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0010