Cited by 24Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSchizophrenia research and treatmentMedia and Digital Communication

Internet use for social interaction by people with psychosis: a systematic review

Jakubowska, Agnieszka, Kaselionyte, Justina, Priebe, Stefan, Giacco, Domenico·2019·Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking

Abstract

People with psychosis (PWP) have difficulties in establishing and maintaining social connections. An earlier systematic review on the use of online social networking (OSN) in psychosis found only 11 studies published before January 2014, but with promising findings. These studies showed no difference in OSN use between PWP and general population. Given the limited number of articles found and the rapid advances in OSN, we carried out an update review to assess evidence on how PWP use OSN. Several electronic databases were searched for the literature published between January 2014 and May 2018. Data from included studies were narratively synthesized. Thirteen additional studies examined the use of OSN in PWP in 2014-2018. Updated evidence confirms that PWP seem to use OSN at least as much as the general population, although only when not acutely unwell. PWP who are younger and have higher education level are more likely to use OSN. There was no evidence of worsening psychological symptoms due to OSN. Some studies showed patient-reported concerns about negative experiences and the inability to identify online social contacts. The use of OSN by PWP is a subject of increasing interest with a rapidly developing evidence base. The frequent use of OSN by PWP and the absence of evidence of symptom worsening are encouraging findings. This would justify the inclusion of OSN among the strategies to reduce social isolation in psychosis. Research methodologies should be improved by developing standardized measures to assess use and associated risks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2018.0554

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jakubowska, A., Kaselionyte, J., Priebe, S., & Giacco, D.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Jakubowska, Agnieszka
Venue
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
Published
2019-05
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
336-343
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2932049663
Cited by
24
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
psychosis, online social networking, social interaction, social isolation, internet use, social media, symptom worsening
MeSH terms
Online Social Networking, Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Social Isolation, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review