Cited by 84Flow Experience in Various FieldsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital Communication

Instagram and TikTok Flow States and Their Association with Psychological Well-Being

Roberts, James A., David, Meredith E.·2023·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

Despite their growing popularity, little research has focused on the association between Instagram and TikTok use and psychological well-being. Informed by Uses and Gratifications Theory, the present study investigates the flow states experienced when using each social media platform and whether these flow states differentially impact user well-being. A flow state is achieved when people are so engrossed in an activity that little else seems to matter to them and they will often continue the activity despite its negative consequences. Based upon a survey of adult Instagram (n = 195, Mage = 38) and TikTok users (n = 225, Mage = 37), the present study identified four unique clusters of users for both platforms based upon the levels of five flow dimensions: focused attention, curiosity, enjoyment, telepresence, and time distortion. Results found that TikTok users reported higher levels of overall flow than Instagram users. TikTok users also reported higher levels of the flow dimensions “enjoyment” and “time distortion.” The flow dimension of “telepresence” (immersion in a world created by the social media application) for both TikTok and Instagram users was associated with higher levels of depression and anxiety. These social media may provide an escape from everyday worries for users, although a suboptimal coping strategy. Whether Instagram and TikTok use are but “improved means to an unimproved end” is an important question that requires additional research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2022.0117

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Roberts and David (2023) found overall flow levels were higher for TikTok than Instagram users, especially in enjoyment and time distortion.

    “Findings indicated that the levels of overall flow were higher for TikTok than Instagram users, especially in the context of dimensions 'enjoyment' and 'time distortion' .”
  • Roberts and David (2023) found telepresence was associated with higher depression and anxiety levels in both TikTok and Instagram users.

    “'Telepresence' , which reflected users escape from real world and immersion in a world created by the social media application, was associated with higher depression and anxiety levels in case of both groups of users.”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E.
Affiliations
Baylor University (US)
Corresponding author
Roberts, James A.
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2023-02-01
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
80-89
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W4318486660
Cited by
84
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 8
FWCI
40.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
Instagram, TikTok, flow experience, psychological well-being, uses and gratifications theory, social media use, telepresence, time distortion, enjoyment, depression, anxiety, coping strategies, user clusters
MeSH terms
Psychological Well-Being, Adult, Anxiety, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review