Cited by 273Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital CommunicationDigital Marketing and Social Media

Development and validation of a social media use integration scale.

Jenkins-Guarnieri, Michael A., Wright, Stephen L., Johnson, Brian·2013·Psychology of Popular Media Culture

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030277

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A., Wright, S. L., & Johnson, B.
Affiliations
University of Northern Colorado (US)
Venue
Psychology of Popular Media Culture
Published
2013-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
38-50
ISSN
  • 2160-4134 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-4142
OpenAlex
W2334175620
Cited by
273
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Popular Media Culture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
social media use, scale development, scale validation, social media integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review