Cited by 36Diabetes Management and ResearchSkin Diseases and DiabetesCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

Effect of Insulin Catheter Wear-Time on Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Blood Flow and Insulin Absorption in Humans

Clausen, Trine Schnedler, Kaastrup, Peter, Stallknecht, Bente·2009·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background Insertion of an insulin catheter for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion into the subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) causes a tissue trauma that may have consequences for insulin absorption. We evaluated the importance of insulin catheter wear-time on subcutaneous adipose tissue blood flow (ATBF) and absorption of the rapid-acting insulin analog insulin aspart over a period of 4 days. Methods Teflon insulin catheters (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were inserted into the abdominal SAT of 10 healthy men without diabetes (mean +/- SEM age, 23.0 +/- 1.1 years; body mass index, 22.1 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2)) and connected to an insulin pump delivering a constant rate of isotonic saline for 4 days. Subjects participated in four study days (days 0, 1, 2, and 4) during which ATBF around the catheter tip was measured by (133)Xe clearance and absorption of an insulin aspart bolus (0.1 U/kg) was measured for 4 h. Results ATBF increased from day 0 to day 2 after catheter insertion (2.6 +/- 0.6 to 4.5 +/- 0.8 mL/100 g/min; P = 0.030). By day 4, ATBF had returned to day 0 level. Time to peak plasma insulin aspart concentration after bolus administration decreased with catheter wear-time from 55 +/- 3 min on day 0 to 45 +/- 4 min on day 4 (P = 0.019). Neither peak plasma concentration nor area under the curve of insulin aspart changed significantly. Conclusions Insertion of a Teflon insulin catheter into the SAT results in increased ATBF and faster absorption of insulin aspart in a peri…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2009.0058

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clausen, T. S., Kaastrup, P., & Stallknecht, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
Corresponding author
Clausen, Trine Schnedler
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2009-09
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
575-580
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W2018493992
Cited by
36
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Keywords
insulin absorption, insulin aspart, insulin pump therapy, tissue trauma, Teflon catheter, xenon-133 clearance, insulin pump, rapid-acting insulin analogs
MeSH terms
Absorption, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, Catheters, Indwelling, Diet, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Regional Blood Flow, Skinfold Thickness, Time Factors, Xenon Radioisotopes, Infusion Pumps, Implantable, Body Mass Index, Area Under Curve, Subcutaneous Fat, Abdominal, Young Adult, Insulin Aspart

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review