Cited by 162Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Interventions to Enhance Adaptation to Bereavement

Open access
Schut, Henk, Stroebe, Margaret S.·2005·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

This paper reviews quantitative evaluations of the efficacy of intervention programs designed to reduce the pain and suffering associated with bereavement. After identifying the psychological and physical health impacts of bereavement and outlining the prevalence of detrimental outcomes, we conclude that a minority of bereaved persons experience severe and sometimes lasting consequences, whereas the majority manage to overcome their grief across the course of time. We detail criteria for establishing the efficacy of bereavement intervention and examine the impact of intervention according to these stringent criteria. We critically examine previous reviews and summarize their conclusions. Using a narrative review approach, we apply a public health framework to organize intervention programs into primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies. A comprehensive, updated review of empirical studies in these categories leads to the following conclusions: Routine intervention for bereavement has not received support from quantitative evaluations of its effectiveness and is therefore not empirically based. Outreach strategies are not advised, and even provision of intervention for those who believe that they need it and who request it should be carefully evaluated. Intervention soon after bereavement may interfere with "natural" grieving processes. Intervention is more effective for those with more complicated forms of grief. Finally, a research agenda is outlined that includes the use of rigorous design and methodological principles in both intervention programs themselves and in studies evaluating their efficacy; systematic investigation of "risk factors"; and comparison of relative effectiveness of different intervention programs (i.e., what works for whom).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.s-140

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reviews and meta-analyses of general bereavement interventions have shown that empirical evidence yields inconclusive results on their effectiveness.

    “Reviews and meta-analyses of general bereavement interventions have shown that although effectiveness of bereavement interventions is often assumed, empirical evidence yields inconclusive results.”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [56]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schut, H., & Stroebe, M. S.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2005-12
Volume
8
Issue
supplement 1
Pages
s-140-s-147
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W1989735232
Cited by
162
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
bereavement, grief, bereavement interventions, complicated grief, intervention efficacy, primary prevention, secondary prevention, tertiary prevention, public health framework, intervention timing, intervention effectiveness evaluation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adjustment Disorders, Bereavement, Counseling, Family, Humans, Psychotherapy, Terminal Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review