Cited by 201Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Relative antidepressant efficacy of venlafaxine and SSRIs: sex-age interactions

Thase, Michael E., Entsuah, Richard, Cantillon, Marc, Kornstein, Susan G.·2005·Journal of Women s Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether differences in antidepressant efficacy are moderated by an interaction of age and gender. METHODS: A pooled dataset from eight randomized, controlled trials of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) was reanalyzed to compare remission rates following therapy with venlafaxine (n = 851), one of several selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (n = 748), or placebo (n = 446). Remission was defined as a final Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score < or =7. Pairwise comparisons were conducted using stepwise multiple logistic regression models with main effect and interaction terms for treatment, sex, and age (younger: <50; older: > or =50). Among older women, the impact of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on remission rates also was examined. RESULTS: Remission rates on venlafaxine therapy were not affected by age, sex, or HRT use. Among women, but not men, there was a significant interaction reflecting poorer SSRI response in the older age group (Wald chi-square = 4.21, df = 1, p = 0.04); HRT appeared to eliminate this difference. Whereas the advantage in remission rates favoring venlafaxine was modest for men and younger women (6%-9%), the difference among older women not taking HRT was 23%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further evidence that age, gender, and HRT moderate response to antidepressant medications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.609

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thase, M. E., Entsuah, R., Cantillon, M., & Kornstein, S. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Wyeth (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Journal of Women s Health
Published
2005-09
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
609-616
ISSN
  • 1059-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9996
  • 1931-843X
OpenAlex
W2088140775
Cited by
201
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH30915)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, major depressive disorder, antidepressant efficacy, sex differences, age differences, hormone replacement therapy, remission, older women, treatment moderators
MeSH terms
Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Cyclohexanols, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Remission Induction, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review