The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bilayered Clathrin Coats on Endosomal Vacuoles Are Involved in Protein Sorting toward Lysosomes
Abstract
In many cells endosomal vacuoles show clathrin coats of which the function is unknown. Herein, we show that this coat is predominantly present on early endosomes and has a characteristic bilayered appearance in the electron microscope. By immunoelectron miscroscopy we show that the coat contains clathrin heavy as well as light chain, but lacks the adaptor complexes AP1, AP2, and AP3, by which it differs from clathrin coats on endocytic vesicles and recycling endosomes. The coat is insensitive to short incubations with brefeldin A, but disappears in the presence of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin. No association of endosomal coated areas with tracks of tubulin or actin was found. By quantitative immunoelectron microscopy, we found that the lysosomal-targeted receptors for growth hormone (GHR) and epidermal growth factor are concentrated in the coated membrane areas, whereas the recycling transferrin receptor is not. In addition, we found that the proteasomal inhibitor MG 132 induces a redistribution of a truncated GHR (GHR-369) toward recycling vesicles, which coincided with a redistribution of endosomal vacuole-associated GHR-369 to the noncoated areas of the limiting membrane. Together, these data suggest a role for the bilayered clathrin coat on vacuolar endosomes in targeting of proteins to lysosomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Core retrieval and recycling complexes localise to specific retrieval sub-domains that are physically distinct from ESCRT-demarcated degradative sub-domains on the same endosome.
“On the limiting membrane of endosomes, electron and light microscopy has established that core retrieval and recycling complexes localise to specific retrieval sub-domains that, while present on the same endosome, are physically distinct from ESCRT-demarcated degradative sub-domains19,32–37.”
From Mapping of endosomal proximity proteomes reveals Retromer as a hub for RAB GTPase regulation (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Raposo, G., Tenza, D., Murphy, D. M., Berson, J. F., & Marks, M. S. (2001) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.152.4.809 · Cited by 451
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 80
- Antonin W., 2000, EMBO J., 19, 6453, 10.1093/emboj/19.23.6453 · DOI
- Bentham J., 1994, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 42, 103, 10.1177/42.1.8263321 · DOI
- Christoforidis S., 1999, Nat. Cell Biol., 1, 249, 10.1038/12075 · DOI · Paper page
- Dell'Angelica E.C., 1998, Science, 280, 431, 10.1126/science.280.5362.431 · DOI
- de Melker A.A., 2001, J. Cell Sci., 114, 2167, 10.1242/jcs.114.11.2167 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.10.12.4163 · DOI
- Draye J.P., 1988, J. Cell Biol., 107, 2109, 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2109 · DOI
- Dunn K.W., 1989, J. Cell Biol., 109, 3303, 10.1083/jcb.109.6.3303 · DOI · Paper page
- Dunn W.A., 1986, J. Cell Biol., 102, 24, 10.1083/jcb.102.1.24 · DOI
- Felder S., 1990, Cell, 61, 623, 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90474-S · DOI
- Fernandez-Borja M., 1999, Curr. Biol., 9, 55, 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80048-7 · DOI
- Futter C.E., 1998, J. Cell Biol., 141, 611, 10.1083/jcb.141.3.611 · DOI
- Galisteo M.L., 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 20242, 10.1074/jbc.270.35.20242 · DOI
- Geuze H.J., 1983, Cell, 32, 277, 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90518-4 · DOI
- Gillooly D.J., 2000, EMBO J., 19, 4577, 10.1093/emboj/19.17.4577 · DOI · Paper page
- Govers R., 1999, EMBO J., 18, 28, 10.1093/emboj/18.1.28 · DOI
- Govers R., 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 16426, 10.1074/jbc.273.26.16426 · DOI
- Govers R., 1997, EMBO J., 16, 4851, 10.1093/emboj/16.16.4851 · DOI
- Habermann A., 2001, J. Cell Sci., 114, 229, 10.1242/jcs.114.1.229 · DOI
- Holtzman E., 1968, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 16, 320, 10.1177/16.5.320 · DOI
- Hopkins C.R., 1994, J. Cell Biol., 125, 1265, 10.1083/jcb.125.6.1265 · DOI
- Jing S.Q., 1990, J. Cell Biol., 110, 283, 10.1083/jcb.110.2.283 · DOI
- Joazeiro C.A., 1999, Science, 286, 309, 10.1126/science.286.5438.309 · DOI
- Kato M., 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 37481, 10.1074/jbc.M007251200 · DOI · Paper page
- Katzmann D.J., 2001, Cell, 106, 145, 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00434-2 · DOI
- Kil S.J., 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 3141, 10.1074/jbc.274.5.3141 · DOI
- Kleijmeer M.J., 1997, J. Cell Biol., 139, 639, 10.1083/jcb.139.3.639 · DOI
- Klumperman J., 1993, J. Cell Biol., 121, 997, 10.1083/jcb.121.5.997 · DOI
- Komada M., 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 20538, 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20538 · DOI
- Kornilova E., 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 30340, 10.1074/jbc.271.48.30340 · DOI
- Kulka R.G., 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 263, 15726, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)37648-3 · DOI
- Lemmon S.K., 2000, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 12, 457, 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00117-4 · DOI
- Levkowitz G., 1999, Mol. Cell, 4, 1029, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80231-2 · DOI
- Levkowitz G., 1998, Genes Dev., 12, 3663, 10.1101/gad.12.23.3663 · DOI
- Liou W., 1996, Histochem. Cell Biol., 106, 41, 10.1007/BF02473201 · DOI
- Liu S.H., 2001, EMBO J., 20, 272, 10.1093/emboj/20.1.272 · DOI
- Mallard F., 1998, J. Cell Biol., 143, 973, 10.1083/jcb.143.4.973 · DOI
- Marchese A., 2001, J Biol Chem., 276, 45509, 10.1074/jbc.C100527200 · DOI
- Matteoni R., 1987, J. Cell Biol., 105, 1253, 10.1083/jcb.105.3.1253 · DOI
- Mayor S., 1993, J. Cell Biol., 121, 1257, 10.1083/jcb.121.6.1257 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1091/mbc.11.9.3137 · DOI
- Nakamura N., 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 6523, 10.1074/jbc.275.9.6523 · DOI
- Odorizzi G., 1998, Cell, 95, 847, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81707-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Ooi C.E., 1998, J. Cell Biol., 142, 391, 10.1083/jcb.142.2.391 · DOI
- Omary M.B., 1981, J. Biol. Chem., 256, 12888, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42979-1 · DOI
- Piper R.C., 1995, J. Cell Biol., 131, 603, 10.1083/jcb.131.3.603 · DOI
- Prekeris R., 1998, J. Cell Biol., 143, 957, 10.1083/jcb.143.4.957 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1091/mbc.10.11.3891 · DOI
- Raiborg C., 2001, EMBO J., 20, 5008, 10.1093/emboj/20.17.5008 · DOI
- Ramm G., 2000, J. Cell Sci., 113, 303, 10.1242/jcs.113.2.303 · DOI
- Reggiori F., 2001, EMBO J., 17, 5176, 10.1093/emboj/20.18.5176 · DOI · Paper page
- Robinson M.S., 1992, Cell, 69, 129, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90124-U · DOI
- Roupas P., 1986, Mol. Cell Endocrinol., 47, 81, 10.1016/0303-7207(86)90018-3 · DOI
- Rubino M., 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 3745, 10.1074/jbc.275.6.3745 · DOI
- Sachse M., 2001, J. Cell Sci., 114, 3943, 10.1242/jcs.114.21.3943 · DOI
- Schmid S.L., 1997, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 66, 511, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.511 · DOI
- Shenoy S.K., 2001, Science, 294, 1307, 10.1126/science.1063866 · DOI
- Slot J.W., 1991, J. Cell Biol., 113, 123, 10.1083/jcb.113.1.123 · DOI
- Sorkina T., 1999, J. Cell Sci., 112, 317, 10.1242/jcs.112.3.317 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1091/mbc.7.3.355 · DOI
- Stang E., 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 13940, 10.1074/jbc.275.18.13940 · DOI
- Stoorvogel W., 1996, J. Cell Biol., 132, 21, 10.1083/jcb.132.1.21 · DOI
- Stoorvogel W., 1987, J. Cell Biol., 104, 1261, 10.1083/jcb.104.5.1261 · DOI
- Strous G.J., 1996, EMBO J., 15, 3806, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00754.x · DOI
- Subtil A., 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 29424, 10.1074/jbc.273.45.29424 · DOI
- Takata H., 2000, Genes Cells, 5, 57, 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2000.00303.x · DOI · Paper page
- Taunton J., 2000, J. Cell Biol., 148, 519, 10.1083/jcb.148.3.519 · DOI
- Traub L.M., 1996, J. Cell Biol., 135, 1801, 10.1083/jcb.135.6.1801 · DOI
- Ungewickell E., 1995, Nature, 378, 632, 10.1038/378632a0 · DOI
- Urbanowski J.L., 2001, Traffic, 2, 622, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2001.20905.x · DOI
- Urbé S., 2000, Mol. Cell Biol., 20, 7685, 10.1128/MCB.20.20.7685-7692.2000 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.01-07-0380 · DOI
- van Deurs B., 1995, Eur. J. Cell Biol., 66, 309
- van Deurs B., 1993, Eur J. Cell Biol., 61, 208
- 10.1091/mbc.12.8.2556 · DOI
- van Kerkhof P., 2001, Biochem Soc. Trans., 29, 488, 10.1042/bst0290488 · DOI
- van Kerkhof P., 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 1575, 10.1074/jbc.275.3.1575 · DOI
- Verges M., 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 10146, 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10146 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.11.7.2327 · DOI
- Wong S.H., 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 375, 10.1074/jbc.273.1.375 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exosomes are released by cultured cortical neurones
Fauré, J., Lachenal, G., Court, M., Hirrlinger, J., Chatellard-Causse, C., Blot, B., Grange, J., Schoehn, G., Goldberg, Y., Boyer, V., et al. (2006) · Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2005.12.003 · Cited by 896
Molecular mechanism of multivesicular body biogenesis by ESCRT complexes
Wollert, T., & Hurley, J. H. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08849 · Cited by 804
Biogenesis and Function of Multivesicular Bodies
Piper, R. C., & Katzmann, D. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123319 · Cited by 771
To degrade or not to degrade: Mechanisms and significance of endocytic recycling
Cullen, P. J., & Steinberg, F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0053-7 · Cited by 590
Retromer: A Master Conductor of Endosome Sorting
Burd, C., & Cullen, P. J. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016774 · Cited by 435
Nada, S., Hondo, A., Kasai, A., Koike, M., Saito, K., Uchiyama, Y., & Okada, M. (2009) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.308 · Cited by 341
Sorting nexin 17 facilitates LRP recycling in the early endosome
van Kerkhof, P., Lee, J., McCormick, L., Tetrault, E., Lu, W., Schoenfish, M., Oorschot, V., Strous, G. J., Klumperman, J., & Bu, G. (2005) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600756 · Cited by 148
Self-citationMapping of endosomal proximity proteomes reveals Retromer as a hub for RAB GTPase regulation
Antón-Plágaro, C., Chen, K.-E., Guo, Q., Liu, M., Evans, A. J., Lewis, P. A., Heesom, K. J., Wilkinson, K. A., Collins, B. M., & Cullen, P. J. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61802-1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Sachse, M., Urbé, S., Oorschot, V., Strous, G. J., & Klumperman, J.
- Affiliations
- Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Institute of Biomembranes, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands;
- Physiological Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, United Kingdom
- Venue
- Molecular Biology of the Cell
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1313-1328
- ISSN
- 1059-1524
- 1939-4586
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review