Measuring Social Norms and Preferences Using Experimental Games: A Guide for Social Scientists
Open accessAbstract
Experimental games turned out to be remarkably productive tools for examining the nature of social preferences and social norms. This paper describes the methods and tools of experimental game theory and provides a selection of games that have been useful. We also discuss the role of evolutionary explanations of and social preference theory in organizing the data in a coherent way.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.980 · Cited by 4,416 · see citing works
Self-citationCollective action and the evolution of social norms.
Ostrom, E. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.137 · Cited by 4,195 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador
Wood, E. J. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808685 · Cited by 1,644 · see citing works
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2002) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00027 · Cited by 1,061 · see citing works
Self-citationPersonality Psychology and Economics
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w16822 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Promoting cooperation in the field
Kraft-Todd, G., Yoeli, E., Bhanot, S., & Rand, D. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.006 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Hu, M., & Shealy, T. (2020) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000771 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Trust and Community in Open Source Software Production
Osterloh, M., & Rota, S. (2004) · Analyse & Kritik · doi:10.1515/auk-2004-0115 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Testing the social competition hypothesis of depression using a simple economic game
Kupferberg, A., Hager, O. M., Fischbacher, U., Brändle, L. S., Haynes, M., & Hasler, G. (2016) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.001362 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Camerer, C. F., & Fehr, E.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- Foundations of Human Sociality
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2004-03-25
- Pages
- 55-95
- OpenAlex
- W2100185167
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 67.04
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.zora.uzh.ch
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (9730364, 0078911)
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Keywords
- social norms, social preferences, experimental games, game theory, evolutionary explanation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review