Cited by 241Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPhysical Activity and HealthDigital Mental Health Interventions

Efficacy of Contextually Tailored Suggestions for Physical Activity: A Micro-randomized Optimization Trial of HeartSteps

Open access
Klasnja, Predrag, Smith, Shawna, Seewald, Nicholas J, Lee, Andy, Hall, Kelly, Luers, Brook, Hekler, Eric B, Murphy, Susan A·2019·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: HeartSteps is an mHealth intervention that encourages regular walking via activity suggestions tailored to the individuals' current context. PURPOSE: We conducted a micro-randomized trial (MRT) to evaluate the efficacy of HeartSteps' activity suggestions to optimize the intervention. METHODS: We conducted a 6-week MRT with 44 adults. Contextually tailored suggestions could be delivered up to five times per day at user-selected times. At each of these five times, for each participant on each day of the study, HeartSteps randomized whether to provide an activity suggestion, and, if so, whether to provide a walking or an antisedentary suggestion. We used a centered and weighted least squares method to analyze the effect of suggestions on the 30-min step count following suggestion randomization. RESULTS: Averaging over study days and types of activity suggestions, delivering a suggestion versus no suggestion increased the 30-min step count by 14% (p = .06), 35 additional steps over the 253-step average. The effect was not evenly distributed in time. Providing any type of suggestion versus no suggestion initially increased the step count by 66% (167 steps; p < .01), but this effect diminished over time. Averaging over study days, delivering a walking suggestion versus no suggestion increased the average step count by 24% (59 steps; p = .02). This increase was greater at the start of study (107% or 271 additional steps; p < .01), but decreased over time. Antisedentary suggestions had no detectable effect on the 30-min step count. CONCLUSION: Contextually tailored walking suggestions are a promising way of initiating bouts of walking throughout the day. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03225521.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/abm/kay067

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klasnja, P., Smith, S., Seewald, N. J., Lee, A., Hall, K., Luers, B., Hekler, E. B., & Murphy, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Klasnja, Predrag
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2018-09-05
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
573-582
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2890071448
Cited by
241
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2
FWCI
27.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01AA023187, P50DA039838, U54EB020404)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mobile health intervention, walking, physical activity, step count, sedentary behavior, micro-randomized trial, intervention optimization
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Walking, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review