Cited by 12Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Research Topics

Optimizing an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Microintervention Via a Mobile App With Two Cohorts: Protocol for Micro-Randomized Trials

Open access
Kroska, Emily B, Hoel, Sydney, Victory, Amanda, Murphy, Susan A, McInnis, Melvin G, Stowe, Zachary N, Cochran, Amy·2020·JMIR Research Protocols

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Given gaps in the treatment of mental health, brief adaptive interventions have become a public health imperative. Transdiagnostic interventions may be particularly appropriate given high rates of medical comorbidity and the broader reach of transdiagnostic therapies. One such approach utilized herein is acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), which is focused on increasing engagement with values, awareness, and openness to internal experiences. ACT theory posits that experiential avoidance is at the center of human suffering, regardless of diagnosis, and, as such, seeks to reduce unworkable experiential avoidance. Objective: Our objective is to provide the rationale and protocol for examining the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of optimizing an ACT-based intervention via a mobile app among two disparate samples, which differ in sociodemographic characteristics and symptom profiles. Methods: Twice each day, participants are prompted via a mobile app to complete assessments of mood and activity and are then randomly assigned to an ACT-based intervention or not. These interventions are questions regarding engagement with values, awareness, and openness to internal experiences. Participant responses are recorded. Analyses will examine completion of assessments, change in symptoms from baseline assessment, and proximal change in mood and activity. A primary outcome of interest is proximal change in activity (eg, form and function of behavior and energy consumed by avoidance and values-based behavior) following interventions as a function of time, symptoms, and behavior, where we hypothesize that participants will focus more energy on values-based behaviors. Analyses will be conducted using a weighted and centered least squares approach. Two samples will run concurrently to assess the capacity of optimizing mobile ACT in populations that differ widely in their clinical presentation and sociodemographic characteristics: individuals with bipolar disorder (n=30) and distressed first-generation college students (n=50). Results: Recruitment began on September 10, 2019, for the bipolar sample and on October 5, 2019, for the college sample. Participation in the study began on October 18, 2019. Conclusions: This study examines an ACT-based intervention among two disparate samples. Should ACT demonstrate feasibility and preliminary effectiveness in each sample, a large randomized controlled trial applying ACT across diagnoses and demographics would be indicated. The public health implications of such an approach may be far-reaching. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04098497; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04098497; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04081662; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04081662 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/17086

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/17086

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A microrandomized trial has been successfully applied to evaluate dynamic and user-tailored eHealth interventions focused on weight management, smoking cessation, and mental health.

    “an MRT has been successfully applied to evaluate dynamic and user-tailored eHealth interventions focused on weight management [52], smoking cessation [53], and MH [54].”

    From Optimization of a Transdiagnostic Mobile Emotion Regulation Intervention for University Students: Protocol for a Microrandomized Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [54]

    For this citation, the relevant part of the sentence is mental health, not weight management or smoking cessation. The Introduction describes micro-randomized trials for mobile interventions, and the Results report that participation had begun in the two mental-health cohorts. But this is a protocol: it reports enrollment, not a completed or successful evaluation of the intervention. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [23]Polk KL Schoendorff B Webster M Olaz FO The Essential Guide to the ACT Matrix: A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the ACT Matrix Model in Clinical Practice 2016 Oakland, CA Context Press
  2. [44]Cohen S Spacapan S Oskamp S Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. The Social Psychology of Health 1988 Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publications 31 67

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kroska, E. B., Hoel, S., Victory, A., Murphy, S. A., McInnis, M. G., Stowe, Z. N., & Cochran, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Cochran, Amy
Venue
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2020-09-23
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
e17086
ISSN
1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047046976
Cited by
12
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002373)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA023187)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH112876)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA039838)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA229437)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, mobile app intervention, micro-randomized trial, adaptive interventions, transdiagnostic treatment, experiential avoidance, bipolar disorder, first-generation college students, intervention optimization, feasibility and safety, comorbidities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review