Cited by 92Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

Designing m-Health interventions for precision mental health support

Open access
Bidargaddi, N., Schrader, G., Klasnja, P., Licinio, J., Murphy, S.·2020·Translational Psychiatry

Abstract

Mobile health (m-Health) resources are emerging as a significant tool to overcome mental health support access barriers due to their ability to rapidly reach and provide support to individuals in need of mental health support. m-Health provides an approach to adapt and initiate mental health support at precise moments, when they are most likely to be effective for the individual. However, poor adoption of mental health apps in the real world suggests that new approaches to optimising the quality of m-Health interventions are critically needed in order to realise the potential translational benefits for mental health support. The micro-randomised trial is an experimental approach for optimising and adapting m-Health resources. This trial design provides data to construct and optimise m-Health interventions. The data can be used to inform when and what type of m-Health interventions should be initiated, and thus serve to integrate interventions into daily routines with precision. Here, we illustrate this approach in a case study, review implementation issues that need to be considered while conducting an MRT, and provide a checklist for mental health m-Health intervention developers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41398-020-00895-2

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A microrandomized trial can evaluate how different intervention components affect an individual in real time and assess how this effect varies over time.

    “An MRT can evaluate how different intervention components affect an individual in real time (ie, directly after they have used it), and it assesses how this effect varies over time”

    From Optimization of a Transdiagnostic Mobile Emotion Regulation Intervention for University Students: Protocol for a Microrandomized Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Micro-randomised trial Overview says MRTs compare intervention options using outcomes measured after each randomised decision, and the Case study says they can examine how those effects relate to time. But the Overview describes the primary estimate as an average effect, not an effect established for a particular individual. The paper also calls for outcomes to be measured within an appropriate near-term period, rather than necessarily directly after use. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mobile technology enables observation of the immediate context through experience sampling and sensors and offers the possibility to recognize an individual's needs and provide relevant support by using recommendation systems.

    “Mobile technology enables observation of the immediate context (eg, emotional state, location, and heart rate) through experience sampling and sensors and offers the possibility to recognize an individual’s needs and provide relevant support by using recommendation systems [30]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Bidargaddi, N. et al. JMU-to prompt or not to prompt? A microrandomized trial of time-varying push notifications to increase proximal engagement with a mobile health app. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. https://mhealth.jmir.org/2018/11/e10123/ (2018). PMC6293241 30497999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bidargaddi, N., Schrader, G., Klasnja, P., Licinio, J., & Murphy, S.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Bidargaddi, N.
Venue
Translational Psychiatry
Published
2020-07-07
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
222-222
ISSN
2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038633450
Cited by
92
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA023187)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA039838)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
mobile health, precision mental health, intervention optimization, implementation issues, translational research
MeSH terms
Humans, Mental Health, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review