CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 627Identity, Memory, and TherapyReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologySocial Representations and Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Redemptive Self

McAdams, Dan P.·2006·Oxford University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195176933.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Drawing from the author's psychological research on especially generative (that is, caring and productive) midlife American adults and on a reading of American cultural history and literature, this book identifies a prototypical story of the good life that many Americans employ to make sense of who they are, who they have been, and who they will be in the future. The central theme in this story is redemption — the deliverance from suffering to a positive status or outcome. Empirical research suggests that highly generative American adults are much more likely than their less generative counterparts to construe their lives as tales of redemption. Redemptive life stories promote psychological well-being, physical health, and the adult's commitment to making a positive contribution to society. But stories of redemption are as much cultural texts as they are individual psychological constructions. From the spiritual autobiographies composed by the Massachusetts Bay Puritans to the most recent episodes of the Oprah Winfrey Show, common scripts for the redemptive self may be found in religious accounts of conversion and atonement, the rags-to-riches stories of the American dream, and canonical cultural narratives about personal liberation, freedom, and recovery. The book examines the psychological and cultural dynamics of redemptive life narratives, including the role of American religion and self-help as sources for the construction of life stories and the broad similarities, as well as the striking differences in how African-American and Euro-American adults construct redemptive stories of the self. For all their psychological and cultural power, redemptive life stories sometimes reveal important limitations in American identity. For example, some versions of the redemptive self underscore the naïve expectation that suffering will always be overcome and the arrogance of seeing one's own life as the living out of a personal manifest destiny.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195176933.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
McAdams, D. P.
Corresponding author
McAdams, Dan P.
ORCID
McAdams, Dan P.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
2006-11-30
DOI
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195176933.001.0001
OpenAlex
W4249908467
Cited by
627
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 30
FWCI
23.57
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
Keywords
generativity, middle-aged adults, American identity, redemption narratives, American religion, self-help, African American adults, American Dream, suffering, psychological well-being, American cultural history, spiritual autobiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review