The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How To Do Things With Words
Open accessAbstract
This work sets out the author's conclusions in the field to which he directed his main efforts for at least the last ten years of his life. Starting from an examination of his already well-known distinction between performative utterances and statements, he finally abandons that distinction, replacing it with a more general theory of ‘illocutionary forces’ of utterances, which has important bearings on a wide variety of philosophical problems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bourdieu borrowed from Austin (1975: 16) in emphasizing ' misfires ' or blips, instances in which attempted speech acts (or by extension, attempted practices of any sort) fail because of some maladaption of practice to the situation (Austin's 'infelicities').”
From Bourdieu, Historicity, and Historical Sociology (2011) · cites this paper as Austin, 1975
In the citing paper
“Not knowing these intended meanings or illocutions, in Austin's (1975) words, interlocutors' misunderstanding is inevitable.”
From Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: Scale Development and Validation (2023) · cites this paper as Austin's (1975)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,901–2,000 of 21,466
Habermas’ theory of communication: A critical explication
Burleson, B. R., & Kline, S. L. (1979) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335637909383492 · Cited by 55
Explanations in Negative Messages: More Insights from Speech Act Theory
Campbell, K. S. (1990) · Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/002194369002700403 · Cited by 55
Emotions: from psychological theories to logical formalization and implementation in a BDI agent
Adam, C. (2007) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 55
Commentary on Nonliteral Language: Processing and Use
Glucksberg, S. (1995) · Metaphor and Symbolic Activity · doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1001_5 · Cited by 55
An analysis of agent speech acts as institutional actions
Colombetti, M., & Verdicchio, M. (2002) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.1145/545056.545092 · Cited by 55
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-3206 · Cited by 55
Quotation of Types and Other Types of Quotation
Goldstein, L. (1984) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/44.1.1 · Cited by 54
Hood‐Williams, J., & Harrison, W. C. (1998) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.00090 · Cited by 54
An awful mark: symbolic violence and urban renewal in reform‐era China
Chau, A. Y. (2008) · Visual Studies · doi:10.1080/14725860802489882 · Cited by 55
Internalism and Externalism in Speech Act Theory
Harnish, R. M. (2009) · Lodz Papers in Pragmatics · doi:10.2478/v10016-009-0001-2 · Cited by 54
Totem and taboo: the embarrassing epistemic work of things in the research setting
Caronia, L. (2014) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794113517392 · Cited by 59
Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship
Vanhoozer, K. J. (2010) · Cited by 54
Davis, W. A. (2015) · Perspectives in pragmatics, psychology & philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21395-8_15 · Cited by 54
Requests in American and British English
Flöck, I. (2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.265 · Cited by 53
Yılmaz, İ., & Barry, J. (2019) · Turkish Studies · doi:10.1080/14683849.2019.1601564 · Cited by 54
Injustice and the Reproduction of History: Structural Inequalities, Gender and Redress
Nuti, A. (2019) · Cited by 54
Lippert‐Rasmussen, K. (2021) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-021-09374-2 · Cited by 54
“7 Roughly, an act is a speech act if it is performed through the uttering of a sentence (Austin 1962: 6–7).”
BackgroundSteiner, P. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521300131.003 · Cited by 54
Oswald, S., Lewiński, M., Greco, S., & Villata, S. (2022) · Argumentation library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4 · Cited by 60
The Portrayal of EFL Teachers in Official Discourse: The Perpetuation of Disdain
Guerrero, C. H. (2010) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 54
Metaphor as Argument: Rhetorical and Epistemic Advantages of Extended Metaphors
Oswald, S., & Rihs, A. (2013) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-013-9304-0 · Cited by 54
Two new scales of formal thought disorder in schizophrenia
Alvaro Barrera, P., McKenna, P. J., & Berríos, G. E. (2007) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2006.09.017 · Cited by 54
Model Discourse: Interpretative Repertoires in Scientists' Conference Talk
McKinlay, A., & Potter, J. (1987) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631287017003003 · Cited by 54
On Jürgen Habermas and public relations
Burkart, R. (2007) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 54
Transmission of Archaic Greek Sympotic Songs: From Lesbos to Alexandria
Nagy, G. (2004) · Critical Inquiry · doi:10.1086/427301 · Cited by 54
“Requests” and “offers” in orangutans and human infants
Rossano, F., & Liebal, K. (2014) · Studies in language and social interaction · doi:10.1075/slsi.26.13ros · Cited by 54
Linguistic Turns in Modern Philosophy
Losonsky, M. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810220 · Cited by 54
Utterance classification in AutoTutor
Olney, A. M., Louwerse, M. M., Mathews, E., Marineau, J., Mitchell, H. H., & Graesser, A. C. (2003) · doi:10.3115/1118894.1118895 · Cited by 54
Activity organization and knowledge construction during competitive interaction in table tennis
Sève, C., Saury, J., Theureau, J., et al. (2002) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/s1389-0417(02)00054-2 · Cited by 54
CMC Technologies for Teaching Foreign Languages
Lafford, P. A., & Lafford, B. A. (2005) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v22i3.679-709 · Cited by 54
“CLT drew on ideas by Hymes (1972), who proposed the need for students to attain communicative competence10 in the target language, Halliday (1973, 1975), who viewed language primarily as a system for conveying meaning and carrying out linguistic functions, Austin (1962) and Searle (1969), whose work on pragmatics high…”
BackgroundOssowskí, S., Hernández, J. Z., Belmonte, M., et al. (2005) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2005.07.005 · Cited by 54
Norman, T. J., & Reed, C. (2001) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44631-1_10 · Cited by 54
Human procedural skill acquisition: theory, model and psychological validation
VanLehn, K. A. (1983) · National Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 54
The power of speech: orality, oaths and evidence in the British Atlantic world, 1650–1800
Ogborn, M. (2010) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00412.x · Cited by 53
Hinchman, E. S. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00455091.2005.10716594 · Cited by 53
Language essentialism and social hierarchies among Giriama and Swahili
McIntosh, J. (2005) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.010 · Cited by 53
Are explicit performatives assertions?
Jary, M. (2007) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10988-007-9015-9 · Cited by 57
What is Communicative Success?
Pagin, P. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1353/cjp.0.0011 · Cited by 53
Creation, dissemination and uptake of fake-quotes in lay political discourse on Facebook and Twitter
Kirner-Ludwig, M. (2019) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.009 · Cited by 54
Dykstra, V. W., Willoughby, T., & Evans, A. D. (2020) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01183-z · Cited by 57
“A lie involves making a false statement with the intention of deceiving (Austin 1962; DePaulo et al. 2003; Grice 1980; Searle 1969).”
BackgroundKim, E. S. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101378 · Cited by 58
Wang, S., Lang, N. W., Bunch, G. C., Basch, S., McHugh, S. R., Huitzilopochtli, S., & Callanan, M. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.641796 · Cited by 77
“Drawing on the sociolinguistic notion of speech acts (Austin, 1975; Searle, 1976; Bachman, 1990; Flowerdew, 2013), defined as units of meaning-making that transcend grammatical structure or ideological notions of “standard” language, she explored language use among emergent bilinguals in Fourth…”
BackgroundDog whistles, covertly coded speech, and the practices that enable them
Quaranto, A. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03791-y · Cited by 62
Foucault and Power: A Critique and Retheorization
Haugaard, M. (2022) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2022.2133803 · Cited by 53
The HL7 reference information model under scrutiny.
Schadow, G., Mead, C. N., & Walker, D. M. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 53
Communication Analysis: A Requirements Engineering Method for Information Systems
España, S., González, A., & Pastor, Ó. (2009) · Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02144-2_41 · Cited by 53
“In this field, a widely extended orientation is the Language Action Paradigm (LAP) [17, 42], which is mainly based on the work of Austin [ 1 ] and Searle’s speech act classification [37].”
MethodRevolución o muerte:Self-Sacrifice and the Ontology of Cuban Revolution
Holbraad, M. (2013) · Ethnos · doi:10.1080/00141844.2013.794149 · Cited by 56
Voice and the Victorian Storyteller
Tearle, O., & Kreilkamp, I. (2007) · The Modern Language Review · doi:10.2307/20467467 · Cited by 53
Videogames and Ideological Frames
Bogost, I. (2006) · Popular Communication · doi:10.1207/s15405710pc0403_2 · Cited by 53
Turnbull, W. W., & Carpendale, J. I. M. (1999) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000022641 · Cited by 53
The race for Ebola drugs: pharmaceuticals, security and global health governance
Roemer-Mahler, A., & Elbe, S. (2016) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1111136 · Cited by 55
Practice Theory and International Relations
Lechner, S., & Frost, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108645775 · Cited by 53
Minding the Source: Automatic Tagging of Reported Speech in Newspaper Articles
Krestel, R., Bergler, S., & Witte, R. (2008) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/53rkm6omdivi · Cited by 53
The way we were; or; The real actual truth about generative semantics
Lakoff, R. T. (1989) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(89)90016-7 · Cited by 53
(M)othering Loss: Telling Adoption Stories, Telling Performativity
Jones, S. H. (2005) · Text and Performance Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10462930500122716 · Cited by 53
Materializing the Hypothalamus: A Performative Account of the `Gay Brain'
Hegarty, P. V. (1997) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959353597073009 · Cited by 53
What's in a word: The distancing function of language in medicine
Mintz, D. L. (1992) · Journal of Medical Humanities · doi:10.1007/bf01137420 · Cited by 53
Voices around the Text: The Ethnography of Reading at Mesivta Tifereth Jerusalem
Boyarin, J. (1989) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.1525/can.1989.4.4.02a00050 · Cited by 53
Language and therapeutic change: A speech acts analysis
Reyes, L., Arístegui, R., Krause, M., Strasser, K., Tomicic, A., Valdés, N., Altimir, C., Ramírez, I., de la Parra, G., Dagnino, P., et al. (2008) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300701576360 · Cited by 53
Jones, R. A. (1983) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002311 · Cited by 53
Stokke, A. (2009) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9537-5 · Cited by 53
“9I am borrowing the term ‘uptake’ from Austin (1962) who used it to describe what he took to be a constraint on a broad range of illocutionary acts.”
BackgroundPro-active Monitoring of Electronic Contracts
Xu, L., & Jeusfeld, M. A. (2003) · Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design · doi:10.1007/3-540-45017-3_39 · Cited by 53
Wish, M., D’Andrade, R. G., & Goodnow, J. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.848 · Cited by 53
Performative Bias in Children's Interpretations of Ambiguous Referential Communications
Ackerman, B. P. (1981) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1981.tb03170.x · Cited by 53
Intergenerational Discourse: Contextual Versions of Ageing and Elderliness
Coupland, J., Coupland, N., & Grainger, K. P. (1991) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x00004001 · Cited by 53
Apprenticeship in Word Use: Social Convergence Processes in Learning Categorically Related Nouns
Adams, A. K., & Bullock, D. H. (1986) · Springer series in cognitive development · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4844-6_7 · Cited by 53
Play as Precursor of Phonology and Syntax
Knight, C. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606441.007 · Cited by 53
Nwana, H. S., & Wooldridge, M. (1997) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-62560-7_38 · Cited by 53
Linguistic analysis of natural language communication with computers
Thompson, B. H. (1980) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/990174.990206 · Cited by 53
The Error Is the Clue: Breakdown In Human-Machine Interaction
Martinovski, B., & Traum, D. R. (2006) · doi:10.21236/ada459168 · Cited by 53
Belief Systems and Language Understanding
Bruce, B. C. (1975) · doi:10.21236/ada012533 · Cited by 53
Presupposition and implicature: Varieties of implicit meaning in explicitation practices
Sbisà, M. (2021) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.027 · Cited by 52
The Next Step towards a Function Markup Language
Heylen, D., Kopp, S., Marsella, S. C., Pelachaud, C., & Vilhjálmsson, H. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85483-8_28 · Cited by 70
The Language of Service Encounters: A Pragmatic-Discursive Approach
Félix‐Brasdefer, J. C. (2015) · Cited by 52
Komagata, N., & Steedman, M. J. (1999) · Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 52
Speech act recognition in conversation: Experimental evidence
Gísladóttir, R. S., Chwilla, D. J., Schriefers, H. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2012) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 49
Charlow, N. (2014) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12151 · Cited by 52
Sensitizing Questions: A Method to Facilitate Analyzing the Meaning of an Utterance
Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2014) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9265-3 · Cited by 63
“It is widely agreed that utterances are actions, and that people do things with words (Austin 1962; Wittgenstein 1953).”
BackgroundBarbarians on the beach: Media narratives of violence in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Penglase, B. (2007) · Crime Media Culture An International Journal · doi:10.1177/1741659007082468 · Cited by 52
Prosodic Characteristics of Early Multi-Word Utterances in Italian Children
D’Odorico, L., & Carubbi, S. (2003) · First Language · doi:10.1177/0142723703023001005 · Cited by 52
Are you referring to me? The variable use of UNO and YO in oral discourse
Flores‐Ferrán, N. (2008) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.024 · Cited by 56
Speech Act Theory: The State of the Art
Levinson, S. C. (1980) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444800008661 · Cited by 51
On subjectivity and ‘long distance Wh-movement’
Verhagen, A. (2012) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110892970.323 · Cited by 52
Presidential concession speeches: The rhetoric of defeat
Corcoran, P. E. (1994) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.1994.9963019 · Cited by 52
Stevanovic, M., & Monzoni, C. Μ. (2016) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.004 · Cited by 53
Tokdemir, E. (2017) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343317708831 · Cited by 39
McGowan, M. K. (2013) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12034 · Cited by 52
The Apotheosis of Home and the Maintenance of Spaces of Violence
Price, J. M. (2002) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01073.x · Cited by 52
Three Aspects of Cultural Influence on Communication
Hwa-Froelich, D. A., & Vigil, D. C. (2004) · Communication Disorders Quarterly · doi:10.1177/15257401040250030201 · Cited by 52
Speech Act Analysis to Short Stories
Altikriti, S. F. (2011) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.4304/jltr.2.6.1374-1384 · Cited by 60
Yu, K.-A. (2011) · Intercultural Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/iprg.2011.018 · Cited by 52
The fundamental context categories in understanding communicative intention
Bosco, F. M., Bucciarelli, M., & Bara, B. G. (2003) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00055-9 · Cited by 52
Global Social Change: A New Agenda for Social Science?
Cooperrider, D. L., & Pasmore, W. A. (1991) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679104401002 · Cited by 50
Conquering Visibility, Conferring Visibility: Visibility Seekers and Media Performance
Dayán, D. (2013) · Cited by 52
Silvast, A. (2017) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.005 · Cited by 52
“Social sciences and humanities research, on different occasions, has found utterances (Austin 1962), legal documents (Faulkner 2012), gender discourse (Jackson 1999), technological promises (Pollock & Williams 2010), and concepts of the nature (Abrams & Lieu 2011) to be performative.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Internet of Things and Multiagent Systems: Decentralized Intelligence in Distributed Computing
Singh, M. P., & Chopra, A. K. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2017.304 · Cited by 52
The Routledge Handbook of Technology, Crime and Justice
McGuire, M. R., & Holt, T. J. 1. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315743981 · Cited by 52
The four dimensions of power: conflict and democracy
Haugaard, M. (2021) · Journal of Political Power · doi:10.1080/2158379x.2021.1878411 · Cited by 52
Austin’s Speech Act Theory and the Speech Situation
Oishi, E. (2006) · Cited by 52
Student Uptake in Electronic Discussions
Ferdig, R. E., & Roehler, L. R. (2003) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2003.10782408 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Austin, J. L.
- Corresponding author
- Austin, J.L.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 1975-09-18
- Pages
- 177-182
- OpenAlex
- W1576632330
- Cited by
- 21,496
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 432 · 2025: 587 · 2024: 705 · 2023: 823 · 2022: 768 · 2021: 996 · 2020: 1094 · 2019: 1291 · 2018: 1056 · 2017: 881 · 2016: 898 · 2015: 873 · 2014: 960 · 2013: 858 · 2012: 797
- FWCI
- 374.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- performatives, illocutionary force, statements, speech acts, pragmatics, philosophy of language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review