The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identity, Belief, and Bias
Abstract
This chapter presents research on the social psychology of identity and belief. Beliefs tied to long-held identities resist change and bias the processing of new information. Theoe phenomena help explain defensive denigration of victims of social problems, resistance to persuasion, intransigence in negotiation, and discrimination in hiring decisions. In each case, intervention strategies based on a social-psychological analysis provide a potential remedy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When people are affirmed in valued domains unrelated to a dispute, they are more open to otherwise identity-threatening political information and less intransigent in negotiations”
From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Cohen 2012
Citations
Cites
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80009-0 · Cited by 2,201
The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory
Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38004-5 · Cited by 1,614
Self-citationFestinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956) · doi:10.1037/10030-000 · Cited by 1,579
Group decision and social change.
Lewin, K. (2004) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10319-010 · Cited by 1,424
Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.
Cohen, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808 · Cited by 1,400
Self-citationGaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986) · Cited by 1,374
The bias blind spot: perceptions of bias in self versus others
Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202286008 · Cited by 1,289
Expert political judgment: how good is it? how can we know?
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-3634 · Cited by 1,260
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Margalit, A. (2000, September 21). The odds against Barak. New York Review of Books. Retrieved February 10, 2010, from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/13812.
- Miller, D., & Prentice, D. (1999). Some consequences of a belief in group essence: The category divide hypothesis. In D. Prentice & D. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 213-38). New York: Russell Sage.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention
Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137 · Cited by 1,302
Self-citationPartisanship as a Social Identity: Implications for Polarization
West, E. A., & Iyengar, S. (2020) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09637-y · Cited by 303
Song, Z., Roth, R. E., Houtman, L., Prestby, T. J., Iverson, A. A., & Gao, S. (2022) · Cartographic Perspectives · doi:10.14714/cp100.1759 · Cited by 32
Yair, O., & Sulitzeanu‐Kenan, R. (2014) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-014-9278-0 · Cited by 18
Zwisler, J. J. (2017) · Cuadernos de lingüística hispánica · doi:10.19053/0121053x.n29.2017.5846 · Cited by 17
Greenstein, S. M., & Zhu, F. (2014) · Cited by 13
Preference, Principle, and Political Casuistry
Knowles, E. D., & Ditto, P. H. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0013 · Cited by 8
Barak‐Corren, N. (2020) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12385 · Cited by 7
Stover, S. K. (2016) · The journal of college science teaching · doi:10.2505/4/jcst16_045_03_23 · Cited by 5
Constructing constructive dialogues for multi-stakeholder collaboration
Ogbeche, T. O., Hurst, K. F., Stern, M. J., & Hurst, Z. M. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102655 · Cited by 1
Crosstalk: Emotion and Misunderstanding in Online Debate
Bailey, E. A. (2021) · Political campaigning and communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65221-0_6 · Cited by 1
Hanson, J., & Yeboah, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0011 · Cited by 1
Social Capture of US and EU Competition Policy: A Lesson from the Global Financial CrisisPreprint
Broulík, J. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3487616 · Cited by 1
Belief, Identity and the Presentation of Self
Bailey, E. A. (2021) · Political campaigning and communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65221-0_5
Exploring New Teacher Beliefs: Identity, Home Life, and Culture in the Classroom
Bradley, F. (2020) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1581252
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, G. L.
- Corresponding author
- Cohen, Geoffrey L.
- ORCID
- Cohen, Geoffrey L.
- Venue
- Ideology, Psychology, and Law
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-01-11
- Pages
- 385-403
- OpenAlex
- W2485784528
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- identity, belief, bias, resistance to persuasion, hiring discrimination, prejudice, social identity, intervention strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review