Developing the Terminology for Dissemination and Implementation Research
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These labelling problems make it difficult to search the empirical literature, conduct meta-analyses, and build a body of evidence that supports the use of specific strategies in particular contexts.
“and this makes it difficult to search the empirical literature, conduct meta-analyses, and ultimately, to build a body of evidence that supports the use of specific strategies in particular contexts [9,64].”
From Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting (2013) · cites this paper as [64]
Homonymy, synonymy, and instability are evident within the dissemination and implementation science literature.
“Certainly, these problems are evident within the dissemination and implementation science literature [13,62-64]”
From Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting (2013) · cites this paper as [64]
At the outer setting level, scale-up strategies may target public policy; human and material resources; and cross-setting learning, collaboration, and competition.
“At the level of the outer setting, scale-up strategies may target public policy; human and material resources; and cross-setting learning, collaboration, and competition [41].”
From Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice (2017) · cites this paper as [41]
Reinvention or adaptation is essential to the success of dissemination and implementation efforts and is likely to lead to at least equal intervention effects as shown in the original efficacy or effectiveness trial.
“Rabin and Brownson (2012) identify reinvention or adaptation as essential to the success of dissemination and implementation efforts and suggest that such adaptation is likely to lead to “at least equal intervention effects as shown in the original efficacy or effectiveness trial” (p. 35).”
From Standards of Evidence for Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Scale-up Research in Prevention Science: Next Generation (2015) · cites this paper as Rabin and Brownson 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., & Kirchner, J. E. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1 · Cited by 4,963 · see citing works
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
Nilsen, P. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 · Cited by 4,447 · see citing works
Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., & McMillen, J. C. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-139 · Cited by 2,585 · see citing works
Bridging Research and Practice
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024 · Cited by 1,386 · see citing works
Self-citationGottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E. M., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Leeman, J., Birken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Rohweder, C., & Shea, C. M. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0657-x · Cited by 544 · see citing works
An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation
Brown, C. H., Curran, G., Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Wells, K. B., Jones, L., Collins, L. M., Duan, N., Mittman, B. S., Wallace, A., et al. (2017) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Brownson, R. C., Jacobs, J. A., Tabak, R. G., Hoehner, C. M., & Stamatakis, K. A. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2012.301165 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Self-citationExpert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC): protocol for a mixed methods study
Waltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Chinman, M. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., Damschroder, L. J., & Kirchner, J. E. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-39 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures
Rabin, B. A., Purcell, P., Naveed, S., Moser, R. P., Henton, M. D., Proctor, E. K., Brownson, R. C., & Glasgow, R. E. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-119 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationBrookman-Frazee, L., Stahmer, A., Stadnick, N., Chlebowski, C., Herschell, A., & Garland, A. F. (2016) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-014-0622-9 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Adapting COMPASS for youth with ASD to improve transition outcomes using implementation science.
Ruble, L., McGrew, J. H., Snell-Rood, C., Adams, M., & Kleinert, H. (2019) · School Psychology · doi:10.1037/spq0000281 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rabin, B. A., & Brownson, R. C.
- Venue
- Dissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-03-29
- Pages
- 23-52
- OpenAlex
- W2501458289
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 56.88
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Keywords
- dissemination research, implementation research, scientific terminology, terminology development, evidence-based practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
