Cited by 33Nutrition, Health, and Society StudiesNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseNutrition and Health Studies

Perspective: nutritional status as a biological variable (NABV): integrating nutrition science into basic and clinical research and care

Open access
Raiten, Daniel J, Combs, Gerald F, Steiber, Alison L, Bremer, Andrew A·2021·Advances in Nutrition

Abstract

The field of nutrition has evolved from one focused primarily on discovery of the identities, metabolic functions, and requirements for essential nutrients to one focused on the application of that knowledge to the development and implementation of dietary recommendations to promote health and prevent disease. This evolution has produced a deeper appreciation of not only the roles of nutrients, but also factors affecting their functions in increasingly complex global health contexts. The intersection of nutrition with an increasingly more complex global health context necessitates a view of nutritional status as a biological variable (NABV), the study of which includes an appreciation that nutritional status is: 1) not limited to dietary exposure; 2) intimately and inextricably involved in all aspects of human health promotion, disease prevention, and treatment; and 3) both an input and an outcome of health and disease. This expanded view of nutrition will inform future research by facilitating considerations of the contexts and variability associated with the many interacting factors affecting and affected by nutritional status. It will also demand new tools to study multifactorial relations to the end of increasing precision and the development of evidence-based, safe, and effective standards of health care, dietary interventions, and public health programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/advances/nmab046

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nutritional assessment should be viewed as involving more than just one nutrient; rather, it should be viewed as the result of myriad interactions of multiple nutrients within biological systems of interest.

    “Conceivably, from both a clinical and public health perspective, nutritional assessment should be viewed as involving more than just one nutrient; rather, it should be viewed as the result of myriad interactions of multiple nutrients within biological systems of interest [9].”
  • Improving the precision of nutritional assessment, diagnosis, and intervention requires viewing nutrition as a biological variable-a complex system resulting from interactions between internal (biology, health status, developmental stage, genetics) and external (social determinants of health, home, community, physical) environments (a nutritional ecology).

    “In this perspective, we make the case that our ability to improve the precision of assessment, diagnosis, and intervention demands a view of nutrition as a biological variable: a complex system resulting from the interactions between our internal (biology, health status, developmental stage, genetics, etc.) and external (social determinants of health, home, community, physical) environments, i.e.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Guthrie HA. Introductory nutrition. 6th ed. St Louis: Times Mirror/Mosby College Pub; 1986.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raiten, D. J., Combs, G. F., Steiber, A. L., & Bremer, A. A.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (US)
Corresponding author
Raiten, Daniel J
Venue
Advances in Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
1599-1609
ISSN
  • 2156-5376 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-8313
OpenAlex
W3162066803
Cited by
33
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
nutritional status, essential nutrients, dietary recommendations, disease prevention, health promotion, global health, personalized nutrition, dietary intervention, public health programs
MeSH terms
Diet, Health Promotion, Humans, Nutritional Status, Global Health, Nutritional Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review