Cited by 183Nutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Longitudinal changes in adult fat-free mass: influence of body weight

Open access
Forbes, Gilbert B·1999·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Almost all of the data on changes in body composition during aging are cross-sectional in nature. These show that fat-free mass (FFM) declines with age. Objective The goal was to analyze results of assays done in the author's laboratory of the FFM of normal adults studied at intervals for >/=2 decades to ascertain longitudinal changes. Design (40)K counting was used to estimate FFM in adult university personnel (15 men, 5 women) over periods ranging from 21 to 38 y. No advice was given about diet or exercise. Results There was considerable variation in the change of FFM over time. Some subjects lost FFM as the years went by, whereas others actually gained FFM. Analysis of the data showed that change in body weight was a prime factor in determining the magnitude and direction of the FFM change (R(2) = 0.54). Adults who maintained their weight lost an average of 1.5 kg FFM per decade and so gained an equal amount of fat; those who lost weight lost even more FFM, whereas those who gained weight either gained FFM or lost it more slowly than the others. Data from the literature confirmed this trend. Conclusions FFM loss is not inevitable during adulthood-at least up to age 81 y, the oldest age yet studied. The magnitude and direction of the FFM change, be it positive or negative, is strongly influenced by change in body weight.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/70.6.1025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forbes, G. B.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Forbes, Gilbert B
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
70
Issue
6
Pages
1025-1031
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116407907
Cited by
183
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-00044, M01RR000044)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-18454, K06HD018454)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
fat-free mass, body composition, weight change, longitudinal change, aging, weight loss, weight gain
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Body Composition, Body Weight, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Scintillation Counting, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review