Cited by 524Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Dietary patterns and changes in body mass index and waist circumference in adults

Open access
Newby, PK, Muller, Denis, Hallfrisch, Judith, Qiao, Ning, Andres, Reubin, Tucker, Katherine L·2003·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Obesity has increased > 20% in the past decade in the United States, and more than one-half of US adults are overweight or obese.Objective Our objective was to further elucidate the nutritional etiology of changes in body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)) and waist circumference by dietary intake pattern. We hypothesized that a healthy dietary pattern would lead to smaller changes in BMI and waist circumference than would other dietary patterns.Design Subjects were 459 healthy men and women participating in the ongoing Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Diet was assessed with the use of 7-d dietary records, from which 41 food groups were created and entered into a cluster analysis.Results Five dietary patterns were derived (healthy, white bread, alcohol, sweets, and meat and potatoes). The mean annual change in BMI was 0.30 +/- 0.06 for subjects in the meat-and-potatoes cluster and 0.05 +/- 0.06 for those in the healthy cluster (P < 0.01). The mean annual change in waist circumference was more than 3 times as great for subjects in the white-bread cluster (1.32 +/- 0.29 cm) as for those in the healthy cluster (0.43 +/- 0.27 cm) (P < 0.05).Conclusions Consuming a diet high in fruit, vegetables, reduced-fat dairy, and whole grains and low in red and processed meat, fast food, and soda was associated with smaller gains in BMI and waist circumference. Because foods are not consumed in isolation, dietary pattern research based on natural eating behavior may be useful in understanding dietary causes of obesity and in helping individuals trying to control their weight.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/77.6.1417

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newby, P., Muller, D., Hallfrisch, J., Qiao, N., Andres, R., & Tucker, K. L.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Tucker, Katherine L
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1417-1425
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132469719
Cited by
524
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 33
FWCI
25.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
dietary habits, body mass index, waist circumference, obesity, weight gain, healthy eating, alcohol consumption, sweets consumption, fruit and vegetable intake, whole grains, fast food, soft drinks, older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Weights and Measures, Diet, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review