Cited by 393Nutritional Studies and DietFood composition and propertiesPhytoestrogen effects and research

Legume and soy food intake and the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the Shanghai Women's Health Study

Open access
Villegas, Raquel, Gao, Yu-Tang, Yang, Gong, Li, Hong-Lan, Elasy, Tom A, Zheng, Wei, Shu, Xiao Ou·2008·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background It has been postulated that a diet high in legumes may be beneficial for the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 DM). However, data linking type 2 DM risk and legume intake are limited.Objective The objective of the study was to examine the association between legume and soy food consumption and self-reported type 2 DM.Design The study was conducted in a population-based prospective cohort of middle-aged Chinese women. We followed 64,227 women with no history of type 2 DM, cancer, or cardiovascular disease at study recruitment for an average of 4.6 y. Participants completed in-person interviews that collected information on diabetes risk factors, including dietary intake and physical activity in adulthood. Anthropometric measurements were taken. Dietary intake was assessed with a validated food-frequency questionnaire at the baseline survey and at the first follow-up survey administered 2-3 y after study recruitment.Results We observed an inverse association between quintiles of total legume intake and 3 mutually exclusive legume groups (peanuts, soybeans, and other legumes) and type 2 DM incidence. The multivariate-adjusted relative risk of type 2 DM for the upper quintile compared with the lower quintile was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.51, 0.74) for total legumes and 0.53 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.62) for soybeans. The association between soy products (other than soy milk) and soy protein consumption (protein derived from soy beans and their products) with type 2 DM was not significant.Conclusions Consumption of legumes, soybeans in particular, was inversely associated with the risk type 2 DM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/87.1.162

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villegas, R., Gao, Y.-T., Yang, G., Li, H.-L., Elasy, T. A., Zheng, W., & Shu, X. O.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Shu, Xiao Ou
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
162-167
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1880301395
Cited by
393
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 28
FWCI
23.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01 CA70867, R01CA070867)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, legume consumption, soybean, soy products, soy protein, diabetes prevention, dietary intake, Chinese women, Shanghai Women's Health Study
MeSH terms
Adult, China, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Surveys, Humans, Fabaceae, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Nutrition Assessment, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Women's Health, Soy Foods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review