Cited by 49Muscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiologyDiabetes Management and Research

Glucoregulation is more precise in women than in men during postexercise recovery

Open access
Henderson, Gregory C, Fattor, Jill A, Horning, Michael A, Faghihnia, Nastaran, Johnson, Matthew L, Luke-Zeitoun, Mona, Brooks, George A·2008·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background The regulation of glycemia is challenged in healthy men and women after exercise bouts of substantial energy expenditure.Objective We determined rates of glucose appearance (Ra), disappearance (Rd), and metabolic clearance (MCR) before, during, and after isoenergetic moderate and hard-intensity exercise.Design Ten men and 8 women received primed-continuous infusion of [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose tracer to measure glucose kinetics. Participants were studied under 3 different conditions with diet unchanged between trials: 1) before, during, and 3 h after 90 min of exercise at 45% of peak oxygen consumption (VO(2)peak; E45); 2) before, during, and 3 h after 60 min of exercise at 65% VO(2)peak (E65), and 3) in a time-matched sedentary control trial.Results In men and women, Ra, Rd, and MCR increased above the control trial during exercise and were higher in E65 than in E45 (P < 0.05). Average Ra, Rd, and MCR remained elevated above the control over 3 h of postexercise recovery in men after exercise in E45 and E65 (P < 0.05), and blood glucose concentrations were depressed below the control during recovery (P < 0.05). Glucose concentrations were not depressed in women during 3 h of postexercise recovery, and in contrast with that in men, average Ra and Rd did not remain significantly elevated during postexercise recovery in women, although MCR did remain elevated in E65 (P < 0.05).Conclusions After exercise bouts, women are better able to maintain glucose concentrations at sedentary control levels, thus not requiring the counter-regulation of glucose production that is seen in men and requiring less accentuation of lipid metabolism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/87.6.1686

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nutrient timing has been proposed to have a significant impact on attenuating health, exercise training, and recovery implications.

    “nutrient timing has been proposed to have a significant impact on attenuating increasing health, exercise training, and recovery implications [153].”

    From International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutritional concerns of the female athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [153]

    The Experimental protocol describes a standardized breakfast three hours before exercise, and the Experimental design says participants ate no food during recovery. The Discussion reports sex differences in postexercise glucoregulation, but no passage found proposes that nutrient timing attenuates health, training, or recovery effects (searched: nutrient timing and timing of food intake). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henderson, G. C., Fattor, J. A., Horning, M. A., Faghihnia, N., Johnson, M. L., Luke-Zeitoun, M., & Brooks, G. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Brooks, George A
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
87
Issue
6
Pages
1686-1694
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2187029953
Cited by
49
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AR42906)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR42906, R01AR042906)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
sex differences, post-exercise recovery, glucose kinetics, glucose appearance, glucose disappearance, metabolic clearance rate, exercise intensity, blood glucose, lipid metabolism, glucose production
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Energy Metabolism, Female, Homeostasis, Humans, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Oxygen Consumption, Rest, Sex Characteristics, Exercise, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review