Cited by 76Nutritional Studies and DietGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Healthy dietary patterns and common pregnancy complications: A prospective and longitudinal study

Open access
Li, Mengying, Grewal, Jagteshwar, Hinkle, Stefanie N, Yisahak, Samrawit F, Grobman, William A, Newman, Roger B, Skupski, Daniel W, Chien, Edward K +3 more·2021·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Adherence to alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), alternate Mediterranean diet (AMED), and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) has been linked to lower risks of chronic diseases. However, their associations with common pregnancy complications are unclear.Objectives This study investigates the associations of AHEI, AMED, and DASH during periconception and pregnancy with common pregnancy complication risks.Methods The study included 1887 pregnant women from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons. Women responded to an FFQ at 8-13 gestational weeks, and they performed a 24-h dietary recall at 16-22 and 24-29 wk. Gestational diabetes (GDM), gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and preterm delivery were ascertained using medical records.Results Healthier diet indicated by higher AHEI, AMED, and DASH scores was generally related to lower risks of pregnancy complications. Significant inverse associations were observed between AHEI score reported at 16-22 wk and GDM risk [adjusted RR (95% CI), highest (Q4) vs. lowest quartile (Q1): 0.32 (0.16, 0.66), P-trend = 0.002]; DASH score reported at both 8-13 [adjusted RR (95% CI), Q4 vs. Q1: 0.45 (0.17, 1.17), P-trend = 0.04] and 16-22 wk [adjusted RR (95% CI), Q4 vs. Q1: 0.19 (0.05, 0.65), P-trend = 0.01] and gestational hypertension risk; AHEI score reported at 24-29 wk and preeclampsia risk [adjusted RR (95% CI), Q4 vs. Q1: 0.31 (0.11, 0.87), P-trend = 0.03]; AMED score reported at 8-13 wk [adjusted RR (95% CI), Q4 vs. Q1: 0.50 (0.25, 1.01), P-trend = 0.03] and DASH score reported at 24-29 wk [adjusted RR (95% CI), Q4 vs. Q1: 0.50, (0.26, 0.96), P-trend = 0.03] and preterm delivery risk.Conclusions Adherence to AHEI, AMED, or DASH during periconception and pregnancy was related to lower risks of GDM, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and preterm delivery.This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00912132.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/nqab145

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Grewal, J., Hinkle, S. N., Yisahak, S. F., Grobman, W. A., Newman, R. B., Skupski, D. W., Chien, E. K., Wing, D. A., Grantz, K. L., & Zhang, C.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Cuilin
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
114
Issue
3
Pages
1229-1237
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165403262
Cited by
76
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
9.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275200800013C, HHSN275200800002I, HHSN27500006, HHSN275200800003IC, HHSN275200800014C, HHSN275200800012C, HHSN275200800028C, HHSN275201000009C, HHSN275201000001Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
pregnancy complications, Healthy Eating Index, alternate Mediterranean diet, DASH diet, dietary habits, gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm birth, maternal diet, dietary adherence, gestational age, 24-hour dietary recall, food frequency questionnaire, chronic disease prevention
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Adult, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Risk Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review