Advantages and Limitations of the Body Mass Index (BMI) to Assess Adult Obesity
Open accessAbstract
Obesity reflects excessive fat deposits. At-risk individuals are guided by healthcare professionals to eat fewer calories and exercise more, often using body mass index (BMI; weight/height2) thresholds for screening and to guide progress and prognosis. By conducting a mini-narrative review of original articles, websites, editorials, commentaries, and guidelines, we sought to place BMI in the context of its appropriate use in population health, clinical screening, and monitoring in clinical care. The review covers studies and publications through 2023, encompassing consensus reviews and relevant literature. Recent consensus reviews suggest that BMI is a valuable tool for population surveys and primary healthcare screening but has limitations in predicting the risk of chronic diseases and assessing excess fat. BMI can guide nutritional and exercise counseling, even if it is inadequate for reliable individual risk prediction. BMI cut-offs must be reconsidered in populations of varying body build, age, and/or ethnicity. Since BMI-diagnosed overweight persons are sometimes physically and physiologically fit by other indicators, persons who are overweight on BMI should be more fully evaluated, diagnosed, and monitored with combined anthropometric and performance metrics to better clarify risks. The use of combined anthropometric and performance metrics involves integrating measurements of body composition with assessments of physical function and fitness to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of an individual’s health and fitness status. Eligibility for bariatric surgery or semaglutide satiety/appetite-reduction medications should not be determined by BMI alone. Awareness of the advantages and limitations of using BMI as a tool to assess adult obesity can maximize its appropriate use in the context of population health and in rapid clinical screening and evaluation.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This mini-narrative review argues that BMI remains useful for population surveillance and rapid primary-care screening but is inadequate for individual risk prediction, body-fat assessment, and universal cut-offs. It recommends combining BMI with anthropometric, body-composition, and performance/fitness metrics and avoiding BMI alone for treatment eligibility.
Key findings
- BMI is simple, inexpensive, and useful for population trends and screening, but it does not measure body fat distribution, functional health/fitness, or the heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes.
- BMI cut-offs vary by institution and population: NIH 1993 used overweight ≥27.8 kg/m² for men and ≥27.3 kg/m² for women; WHO 1993 used normal 20–24.9, overweight 25–29.9, and obesity ≥30; Chinese adults 2002 used overweight 24–27.9 and obesity ≥28; Indians 2015 used overweight 23–24.9 and obesity ≥25; South Asians 2023 used overweight ≥23.
- Misclassification and risk-prediction limits are reported: in 40,420 US adults aged >18 years, modeled results suggested >70 million US adults would be misclassified as cardiometabolically healthy or unhealthy by BMI; in 899 women, lean but unfit women had higher all-cause mortality risk than overweight but more fit women; in 15,828 patients with stable coronary heart disease, risk factors rose above BMI 25 kg/m², BMI <20 and ≥35 kg/m² indicated poor prognosis, and lowest all-cause/cardiovascular mortality was at BMI 25–35 kg/m².
- Body fat varies widely at the same BMI: men with BMI 27 kg/m² had a 95% CI for body fat percentage from 10% to 32%, and the BMI cutoff for type 2 diabetes risk equivalent to 25 kg/m² in White populations was as low as 19.2 kg/m² in South Asians.
Methods
- Mini-narrative review, not a formal scoping review; the authors searched Google Scholar for popular scientific articles and news critiquing BMI, searched PubMed for principal scientific peer views, and obtained alternative or complementary measures from the CDC, NIH, The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Commission, AMA, and WHO, and assessed the AMA Council on Science and Public Health critique of BMI.
- The review covers studies and publications through 2023, encompassing consensus reviews and relevant literature.
- No systematic search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, quality appraisal, or quantitative synthesis is reported.
Limitations
- Stated: the authors describe the work as a mini-narrative review rather than a formal scoping review.
- Evident: no systematic search dates, search strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, risk-of-bias assessment, or meta-analysis are provided, so conclusions rely on selected literature and consensus reports.
- Evident: the cited numerical findings come from heterogeneous studies with different populations and designs, and the paper does not pool them or formally compare their predictive performance.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
48 of 92 cited sources checked · 16 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
BMI does not measure body fat distribution, such as more harmful abdominal fat.
“BMI does not measure body fat distribution (e.g., it does not recognize more harmful abdominal fat), is a limited measure of body fat (inviting misclassification of persons who are muscular or have larger bone structures) [11], and does not inform practitioners of either the origin or the heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes in specific individuals or populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Bray, G.A. (2023). Beyond BMI. Nutrients, 15. source
- Premisecitation
In patients with coronary heart disease, the lowest rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were observed in the BMI range of 25 to 35 kg/m2.
“Nevertheless, the lowest rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among these patients with coronary heart disease were observed in the BMI range of 25 to 35 kg/m2, suggesting that BMI alone is too simplistic to give a comprehensive risk assessment in a clinical setting without consideration of many other factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Held, 2022, Body Mass Index and Association With Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease—A STABILITY Substudy, J. Am. Heart Assoc. source
- Premisecitation
BMI does not inform practitioners of the origin or heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes in specific individuals or populations.
“BMI does not measure body fat distribution (e.g., it does not recognize more harmful abdominal fat), is a limited measure of body fat (inviting misclassification of persons who are muscular or have larger bone structures) [11], and does not inform practitioners of either the origin or the heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes in specific individuals or populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Bray, G.A. (2023). Beyond BMI. Nutrients, 15. source
The Abstract and Section 5 state that BMI does not reveal obesity’s underlying causes or heterogeneity. Section 8 says evaluating its impacts on an individual requires additional information. Our copy does not establish the further claim that BMI cannot inform practitioners about variation in outcomes across specific populations; it describes BMI as useful for tracking population trends. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The genetics of obesity are not sufficient to account for the variability of BMI.
“However, the genetics of obesity are not sufficient to account for the variability of BMI [20,21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
BMI was developed originally from a single sample of White, middle-aged European men.
“BMI was developed originally from a single sample of White, middle-aged European men [3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Nuttall, 2015, Body Mass Index: Obesity, BMI, and Health: A Critical Review, Nutr. Today source
The “Lambert Adolph Jacque Quetelet” section says Quetelet identified the weight-to-height-squared relationship in normal young adults, and “Mathematical Adjustment of Body Build” says he developed the Quetelet Index in the 1800s. Our copy does not say it came from a single sample of White European men; its description of young adults also conflicts with “middle-aged.” No page numbers were supplied for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
BMI serves as a useful tool to predict the risk and prognosis of certain chronic diseases.
“Moreover, BMI serves as a useful tool to predict the risk and prognosis of certain chronic diseases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Held, 2022, Body Mass Index and Association With Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease—A STABILITY Substudy, J. Am. Heart Assoc. source
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that BMI was associated with cardiovascular death, total death, and heart-failure hospitalization in patients with stable coronary heart disease. This supports BMI as a prognostic marker in that population, but the paper does not establish its usefulness for predicting the risk and prognosis of chronic diseases more generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In patients with stable coronary heart disease, a BMI below 20 kg/m2 and a BMI of 35 kg/m2 or higher were significant indicators of a poor prognosis.
“A BMI below 20 kg/m2 and a BMI of 35 kg/m2 or higher were significant indicators of a poor prognosis [29].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Held, 2022, Body Mass Index and Association With Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease—A STABILITY Substudy, J. Am. Heart Assoc. source
The Abstract Conclusions describe both BMI <20 and ≥35 kg/m2 as strong markers of poor prognosis in patients with stable coronary heart disease. However, the Results (BMI and Association With Clinical Outcomes; page unavailable) report that, after multivariable adjustment, the elevated risks of cardiovascular death and heart-failure hospitalization at ≥35 kg/m2 were not statistically significant; increased total mortality was confined to the very-low-BMI group. Thus, calling both thresholds significant indicators overstates the findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
South Asian body habitus is different enough to suggest a need for completely different cut-offs for obesity in BMI screening.
“The importance of this diversity is illustrated by the South Asian body habitus that is different enough from others to suggest a need for completely different cut-offs for obesity in BMI screening [26].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Gray, L.J., Yates, T., Davies, M.J., Brady, E., Webb, D.R., Sattar, N., and Khunti, K. (2011). Defining obesity cut-off points for migrant South Asians. PLoS ONE, 6. source
- Premisecitation
BMI cutoff values for categories have fluctuated over the past century depending on the given year and guideline document.
“Cutoff values for categories have fluctuated over the past century, depending upon the given year and guideline document (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [3] Nuttall, 2015, Body Mass Index: Obesity, BMI, and Health: A Critical Review, Nutr. Today source
- cites [35] Becker, 1998, Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults—The Evidence Report, Obes. Res.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Zhou, 2002, Effect of body mass index on all-cause mortality and incidence of cardiovascular diseases-report for meta-analysis of prospective studies open optimal cut-off points of body mass index in Chinese adults, Biomed. Environ. Sci.
- Premisecitation
In a study of 40,420 US persons aged >18 years, modeled results suggested that >70 million US adults would be misclassified as cardiometabolically healthy or unhealthy by BMI.
“In a study of 40,420 persons aged >18 years in the US, researchers used nutritional status measures, including cholesterol and glucose, to determine whether subjects were at risk of cardiometabolic health disease by comparing their predictive values with BMI; modeled results suggested that >70 million US adults would be misclassified as cardiometabolically healthy or unhealthy by BMI [52].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Tomiyama, 2016, Misclassification of cardiometabolic health when using body mass index categories in NHANES 2005–2012, Int. J. Obes. source
- Premisecitation
Waist-to-hip ratio may be a better predictor of cardiovascular disease occurrence than BMI.
“The waist-to-hip ratio uses waist and hip circumference measurements and may be a better predictor of cardiovascular disease occurrence than BMI [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Darbandi, 2020, Discriminatory Capacity of Anthropometric Indices for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Prev. Chronic Dis. source
- Premisecitation
Assessment of total body fat requires the integration of skinfold thickness measurements at different body sites, considering the number of sites and their locations, with sex-specific adjustments.
“The assessment of total body fat requires the integration of skinfold thickness measurements at different body sites. The integration of data considers the number of sites and their locations, with sex-specific adjustments [61].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Holmes, C.J., and Racette, S.B. (2021). The Utility of Body Composition Assessment in Nutrition and Clinical Practice: An Overview of Current Methodology. Nutrients, 13. source
- Premisecitation
A study of 5344 participants aged >55 years old suggested that the benefits of physical activity may compensate to some extent for the adverse predictions of a higher BMI.
“A study of 5344 participants aged >55 years old suggested that the benefits of physical activity may compensate to some extent for the adverse predictions of a higher BMI [44].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Jih, 2014, Using appropriate body mass index cut points for overweight and obesity among Asian Americans, Prev. Med. source
The Methods (Study design and sample; page unavailable) describe adults aged 18 and older, while the Discussion addresses BMI cut points and metabolic risk. Searches for “5344,” “physical activity,” and activity offsetting the effects of higher BMI found no passage reporting the claimed study or finding. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The BMI cutoff of age- and sex-adjusted incidence for type 2 diabetes equivalent to the cutoff of 25 kg/m2 in the White population is as low as 19.2 kg/m2 in South Asians.
“The BMI cutoff of age- and sex-adjusted incidence for type 2 diabetes that is equivalent to the cutoff of 25 kg/m2 in the White population is as low as 19.2 kg/m2 in South Asians [39].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Caleyachetty, 2021, Ethnicity-specific BMI cutoffs for obesity based on type 2 diabetes risk in England: A population-based cohort study, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. source
The Methods (Statistical analysis; page unavailable) say the study identified age- and sex-adjusted BMI cutoffs risk-equivalent to 25.0 kg/m² in White populations. The Discussion (page unavailable) says the corresponding overweight cutoffs were lower in South Asian populations, but the passages in our copy do not give the claimed value of 19.2 kg/m²; the reported 23.9 kg/m² figure instead uses a White reference BMI of 30.0 kg/m². (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Standard BMI categories can lead to misclassification bias when considering age, ethnicity, race, sex, or metabolic disease risks for certain disorders.
“Standard BMI categories can lead to misclassification bias when considering age, ethnicity, race, sex, or metabolic disease risks for certain disorders [51].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Stanford, 2019, Race, Ethnicity, Sex, and Obesity: Is It Time to Personalize the Scale?, Mayo Clin. Proc. source
In “To the Editor” (page not supplied), the authors argue that a single BMI threshold can underdiagnose or overdiagnose obesity across race/ethnicity and sex groups, and propose cutoffs linked to metabolic risk factors. The passages do not address age-based misclassification, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A study of 899 women showed that lean but unfit women had a higher risk of all-cause mortality than overweight but more fit women.
“Another study of 899 women showed that lean but unfit women had a higher risk of all-cause mortality than overweight but more fit women, i.e., BMI was less predictive than good fitness [45].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Koolhaas, 2017, Impact of physical activity on the association of overweight and obesity with cardiovascular disease: The Rotterdam Study, Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. source
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that four of eight studies in a review found lower cardiovascular mortality risk in physically active obese participants than in less active normal-weight participants. It does not report a study of 899 women or the claimed comparison in all-cause mortality, and its measure is physical activity rather than fitness. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
An automated computer vision method (VBC) using smartphone photographs and convolutional neural networks had promising validations versus DXA, BIA, and ADP.
“An automated computer vision method estimates total body fat via visual body composition (VBC) that uses two-dimensional photographs from a conventional smartphone camera and convolutional neural network algorithms; validations were promising versus more burdensome DXA, BIA, and ADP measures [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Majmudar, 2022, Smartphone camera based assessment of adiposity: A validation study, NPJ Digit. Med. source
- Premisecitation
Better mortality outcomes in persons with overweight or obesity may occur in certain race-ethnicity-sex-age strata, termed the fat but fit paradigm or obesity paradox.
“Termed by some observers as the “fat but fit” paradigm or an “obesity paradox”, better mortality outcomes in persons with overweight or obesity may occur in certain race-ethnicity-sex-age strata [47,48], and fitness level must be considered while assessing the association between body weight and medical outcomes [49].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [47] Jae, 2022, Joint Associations of Obesity and Cardiorespiratory Fitness with Coronary Artery Calcium Composition: Is There Evidence For Fat-But-Fit?, J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. Prev. source
- cites [48] Alcazar, 2021, ‘Fat but powerful’ paradox: Association of muscle power and adiposity markers with all-cause mortality in older adults from the EXERNET multicentre study, Br. J. Sports Med. source
The Introduction describes lower mortality among fit people with obesity than among unfit people without obesity, calling this the ‘fat but fit’ paradox. The Conclusions report a survival benefit for powerful older adults with obesity under some adiposity measures, but not fat index. The Participants section describes an all-Caucasian sample aged 65 or older; the paper does not establish the claimed pattern across race-ethnicity-sex-age strata. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Among US adults aged >50 years, an interaction of birth cohort and known genetic variants with BMI suggested that genetic risks might be exacerbated by obesogenic exposures.
“Among US adults aged >50 years, a multilocus genetic risk score for BMI was estimated for participants born between 1900 and 1958; an interaction of birth cohort and known genetic variants with BMI suggested that genetic risks might be exacerbated by obesogenic exposures [53].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Walter, 2016, Association of a Genetic Risk Score With Body Mass Index Across Different Birth Cohorts, JAMA source
- Premisecitation
Waist-to-height ratio was found to be associated with dyslipidemia and hyperuricemia in a sample of 4565 adults in China.
“The waist-to-height ratio was found to be associated with dyslipidemia and hyperuricemia in a sample of 4565 adults in China [57].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Yang, 2024, The prevalence of obesity and relationship between obesity indicators and chronic diseases in Northern Shaanxi, China, Endokrynol. Pol. source
- Premisecitation
Waist-to-height ratio does not account for individual variations in body shape, muscle mass, and bone structure.
“One key limitation of waist-to-height is that it does not account for individual variations in body shape, muscle mass, and bone structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Vári, B., Győri, F., Katona, Z., and Berki, T. (2023). The Impact of Age and Body Composition on Bone Density among Office Worker Women in Hungary. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20. source
The Methods (§2.2.2) lists the body-composition measures used, and the Results (§3) discusses their associations with bone quality. Neither addresses a limitation of waist-to-height ratio. Searches for the claimed limitation and for waist-to-height ratio found no passage supporting it; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Fitness level must be considered while assessing the association between body weight and medical outcomes.
“Termed by some observers as the “fat but fit” paradigm or an “obesity paradox”, better mortality outcomes in persons with overweight or obesity may occur in certain race-ethnicity-sex-age strata [47,48], and fitness level must be considered while assessing the association between body weight and medical outcomes [49].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Yerrakalva, 2015, The associations of “fatness”, “fitness”, and physical activity with all-cause mortality in older adults: A systematic review, Obesity source
The Discussion says fitness may be a more important determinant of survival than being overweight in adults aged 60 or over, and the Conclusions call for better fitness measures in studies of adiposity and mortality. But the review addresses all-cause mortality in older adults, not medical outcomes generally; it also reports that the two studies stratifying by fitness found no significant effect on the adiposity–mortality relationship. Thus, “must be considered” is stronger and broader than the evidence presented. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Body Fat Percentage provides a more precise assessment of body composition than BMI.
“Body Fat Percentage measures the proportion of fat relative to total body weight, providing a more precise assessment of body composition than BMI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Manosroi, W., and Atthakomol, P. (2020). High body fat percentage is associated with primary aldosteronism: A cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr. Disord., 20. source
The Methods section measures percentage body fat separately from BMI. The Discussion says BMI may underestimate body fat content in Asian populations, supporting a narrower comparison, but it does not establish that body-fat percentage is generally a more precise assessment of body composition than BMI. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Assessments for harmful adiposity encounter health system constraints of accessibility and affordability.
“Medical evaluations with greater predictive value need accurate measures and a definitive diagnosis of harmful adiposity, as well as functional assessments; such assessments encounter health system constraints of accessibility and affordability [64].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Ng, 2018, Validation of rapid 4-component body composition assessment with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says conventional four-component body-composition assessment is costly and time-consuming and therefore seldom used in clinics, supporting an affordability and accessibility constraint for that method. The paper does not establish the same constraint for functional assessments or definitive diagnosis of harmful adiposity more generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A personalized approach to obesity assessment considers factors such as muscle mass, visceral fat levels, and metabolic health markers, in addition to weight status.
“This personalized approach to obesity assessment considers factors such as muscle mass, visceral fat levels, and metabolic health markers, in addition to weight status [64].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Ng, 2018, Validation of rapid 4-component body composition assessment with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. source
The Abstract Conclusions and Discussion (pages not provided) describe assessing fat, protein, and hydration for clinical uses that include obesity, supporting assessment beyond weight alone. The paper does not specify visceral fat levels or metabolic health markers as components of that assessment, and its protein or lean-mass measures are not direct muscle-mass measurements. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Combining advanced body composition analysis with comprehensive blood variables offers a promising strategy for improving obesity assessment at the population level and advancing personalized healthcare approaches to combat obesity and its related health consequences.
“Combining advanced body composition analysis with comprehensive blood variables offers a promising strategy for improving obesity assessment at the population level and advancing personalized healthcare approaches to combat obesity and its related health consequences [61,67].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [61] Holmes, C.J., and Racette, S.B. (2021). The Utility of Body Composition Assessment in Nutrition and Clinical Practice: An Overview of Current Methodology. Nutrients, 13. source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [67] Santhanam, 2021, A systematic review of imaging studies of human brown adipose tissue, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. source
- Interpretationcitation
Incorporating blood variables such as lipid profile, glucose levels, and inflammatory markers can offer insights into metabolic health and obesity-related risks beyond what BMI alone can provide.
“Additionally, incorporating blood variables such as lipid profile, glucose levels, and inflammatory markers can offer insights into metabolic health and obesity-related risks beyond what BMI alone can provide [62].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Lee, 2008, Assessment methods in human body composition, Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care source
The MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy section discusses tissue lipid measurements and their relevance to insulin resistance, not blood measurements. Searches for lipid profiles, blood glucose, and inflammatory markers found no passage assessing whether those variables add insight beyond BMI. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
The validity of BMI for the global south is compromised.
“Thus, the validity of BMI for the global south is compromised.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Assessing progress using BMI can be challenging for adults in a fitness program because they may gain muscle mass while losing fat, resulting in an increased or stable BMI.
“Assessing progress using BMI can be challenging for adults engaged in a fitness program that includes exercise and a healthier, calorie-controlled diet. This challenge arises because the individual may gain muscle mass while losing fat, resulting in an increased or stable BMI, which confuses the evaluation by health/fitness professionals monitoring patient/client progress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] (2011, August 02). Body Mass Index: Considerations for Practitioners, Available online: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/25368.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
South Asian body habitus is thought to have higher health risks at a lower BMI than Caucasians due to a comparatively higher proportion of body fat at the same BMI.
“The so-called South Asian body habitus is thought to have higher health risks at a lower BMI than among Caucasians due to a comparatively higher proportion of body fat at the same BMI [38].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Schmidt, 2000, The paradox of low body mass index and high body fat percentage among Chinese, Malays and Indians in Singapore, Int. J. Obes. source
- Interpretationreasoning
BMI alone is too simplistic to give a comprehensive risk assessment in a clinical setting without consideration of many other factors.
“Nevertheless, the lowest rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among these patients with coronary heart disease were observed in the BMI range of 25 to 35 kg/m2, suggesting that BMI alone is too simplistic to give a comprehensive risk assessment in a clinical setting without consideration of many other factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The convenience and simplicity of BMI enable clinicians and epidemiologists to estimate health and mortality risks and trends in individuals and populations.
“The convenience and simplicity of BMI measurement enable clinicians and epidemiologists to estimate individuals and populations alike as to health and mortality risks and trends [27,28].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] (2011, August 02). Body Mass Index: Considerations for Practitioners, Available online: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/25368.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] (2024, March 01). Obesity and Overweight. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a sample of men with a BMI of 27 kg/m2, the 95% confidence interval for body fat percentage varied from 10% to 32%.
“In a sample of men with a BMI of 27 kg/m2 (characterized by BMI as overweight), the 95% confidence interval for body fat percentage varied from 10% to 32% [32].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Smalley, 1990, Reassessment of body mass indices, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Variability in the prognostic value of BMI among a variety of sub-populations is very likely given the simplicity of the metric.
“Variability in the prognostic value of BMI among a variety of sub-populations is very likely given the simplicity of the metric.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Waist circumference can assess body fat distribution by measuring the distance around the abdomen in different anatomical locations.
“Waist circumferences can assess body fat distribution by measuring the distance around the abdomen in different anatomical locations [56].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Wang, 2003, Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Varying BMI guidelines and thresholds suggest that BMI is not a robust universal metric unless tailored for specific populations.
“Varying BMI guidelines and thresholds suggest that BMI is not a robust universal metric unless tailored for specific populations (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The global rise in obesity and decline in underweight are attributed to a shift in the population distribution of BMI.
“The obesity crisis or progress in reducing undernutrition cannot be assessed by BMI alone; however, the global rise in obesity and decline in underweight are attributed to a shift in the population distribution of BMI, and this can mask social inequity both within and across populations [63].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Papathakis, 2005, Comparison of isotope dilution with bioimpedance spectroscopy and anthropometry for assessment of body composition in asymptomatic HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected breastfeeding mothers, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Persons with sarcopenic obesity would not be successfully identified if screened by WHO BMI criteria.
“Consequently, persons with more body fat at a lower BMI than considered obese by WHO cut-offs, termed “sarcopenic obesity” [30], are at higher risk of type 2 diabetes with a relative excess adiposity, but would not be successfully identified if screened by WHO BMI criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Waist circumference provides a general measure of abdominal fat without distinguishing between subcutaneous fat and visceral fat.
“One disadvantage of using waist circumference to assess body fat distribution is that it provides a general measure of abdominal fat without distinguishing between subcutaneous fat and visceral fat.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Wang, 2003, Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. source
- Premisecitation
Persons with more body fat at a lower BMI than considered obese by WHO cut-offs, termed sarcopenic obesity, are at higher risk of type 2 diabetes with relative excess adiposity.
“Consequently, persons with more body fat at a lower BMI than considered obese by WHO cut-offs, termed “sarcopenic obesity” [30], are at higher risk of type 2 diabetes with a relative excess adiposity, but would not be successfully identified if screened by WHO BMI criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Liu, 2023, Deciphering the “obesity paradox” in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sarcopenic obesity, Obes. Rev. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Advanced technologies such as BIA, DXA, or ADP provide more detailed information about body fat distribution and composition compared to BMI.
“These methods provide more detailed information about body fat distribution and composition compared to BMI, which only considers weight and height.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
BMI provides valuable information at a population and community level, particularly for assessing trends.
“BMI provides valuable information at a population and community level, particularly for assessing trends.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Nutritional epidemiology faces continuing challenges in assigning BMI a suitable screening and preliminary evaluation role.
“Nutritional epidemiology faces continuing challenges in assigning BMI a suitable screening and preliminary evaluation role; further evidence-based consensus is needed for guidelines and diagnostic thresholds in varying populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
BMI has limitations in estimating body fat amount or adipose tissue distribution.
“However, BMI must not be confused with an authoritative standard for assessing adult body habitus, given its limitations in estimating body fat amount or adipose tissue distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Combining advanced body composition analysis techniques with comprehensive metabolic and fitness testing can give healthcare professionals a more comprehensive understanding of an individual's health status and obesity-related risks.
“By combining advanced body composition analysis techniques with comprehensive metabolic and fitness testing, healthcare professionals can gain a more comprehensive understanding of an individual’s health status and obesity-related risks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
BMI loses its predictability in assessing fat mass at the individual level because of body variation among different age, sex, and race groups.
“BMI loses its predictability in assessing the fat mass on the individual level because of the body variation among different age, sex, and race groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Luppino, 2010, Overweight, obesity, and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry source
- Interpretationcitation
A shift in the population distribution of BMI can mask social inequity both within and across populations.
“The obesity crisis or progress in reducing undernutrition cannot be assessed by BMI alone; however, the global rise in obesity and decline in underweight are attributed to a shift in the population distribution of BMI, and this can mask social inequity both within and across populations [63].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Papathakis, 2005, Comparison of isotope dilution with bioimpedance spectroscopy and anthropometry for assessment of body composition in asymptomatic HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected breastfeeding mothers, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. source
- Premisecitation
There are issues with BMI in diagnosing obesity.
“There are issues with BMI in diagnosing obesity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Luppino, 2010, Overweight, obesity, and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry source
- Premisecitation
Cardiorespiratory fitness is a robust predictor of overall health and mortality.
“Cardiorespiratory fitness [71] (CRF) assesses the efficiency of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems in supplying oxygen during sustained physical activity and is a robust predictor of overall health and mortality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Carnethon, 2003, Cardiorespiratory fitness in young adulthood and the development of cardiovascular disease risk factors, JAMA source
- May combine two claims. 36
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBMI cut-offs may not hold the same predictive value for individuals over the age of 65 as they do for younger adults, and modest overweight status may not carry the same health implications for the older population.
“BMI cut-offs may not hold the same predictive value for individuals over the age of 65 as they do for younger adults, as modest overweight status may not carry the same health implications for the older population [31].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Soysal, 2022, What is the Optimal Body Mass Index Range for Older Adults?, Ann. Geriatr. Med. Res. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationObesity is a risk factor for multiple outcomes such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic orthopedic problems, accidents, collagen vascular diseases, lower quality of life, osteoarthritis, and autoimmune disorders.
“Healthcare providers and public health agencies alike recognize obesity to be a risk factor for multiple outcomes such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic orthopedic problems, accidents, collagen vascular diseases, lower quality of life, osteoarthritis, and autoimmune disorders [13,14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Darbandi, 2020, Discriminatory Capacity of Anthropometric Indices for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Prev. Chronic Dis. source
The Introduction identifies obesity as a CVD risk factor, and the Discussion links excess fat accumulation to features of diabetes. The supplied passages do not support the additional claims about orthopedic problems, accidents, collagen vascular diseases, lower quality of life, osteoarthritis, or autoimmune disorders. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [14] (2024, February 20). Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/healthy-weight-growth/about/index.html.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigher BMI is influenced heavily by sedentary lifestyles, structural elements in the lived environment, affordability and availability of healthy foods, and marketing and promotion of unhealthy foods.
“Higher BMI is influenced heavily by sedentary lifestyles, structural elements (e.g., parks, sidewalks, bicycle lanes) in the lived environment, affordability and availability of healthy foods (so-called “food deserts” are neighborhoods where fresh vegetables and fruits are not conveniently obtained), and marketing and promotion of unhealthy foods in society [22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Silventoinen, 2020, Obesity and eating behavior from the perspective of twin and genetic research, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. source
The Introduction links physical activity to weight control and suggests that increased availability of processed fast food contributed to the obesity epidemic. It does not establish effects of parks, sidewalks, bicycle lanes, healthy-food affordability or “food deserts,” or marketing; it says the specific factors behind obesogenic environments remain poorly understood. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBMI is relatively simple to measure in adults and functionally sums a variety of complex body indicators.
“BMI is relatively simple to measure in adults [4,5,6,7,8,9] and functionally sums a variety of complex body indicators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim6 of 6 sources checked- cites [4] Freedman, 2017, The Limitations of Transforming Very High Body Mass Indexes into z-Scores among 8.7 Million 2- to 4-Year-Old Children, J. Pediatr. source
The Methods section (page unavailable) calculates BMI from weight and height, consistent with BMI being a relatively simple measure. But the paper studies young children and does not address ease of measurement in adults. Its Discussion (page unavailable) compares BMI metrics with adiposity measures; it does not establish that BMI sums a variety of body indicators. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [5] Cuda, 2022, Assessment, differential diagnosis, and initial clinical evaluation of the pediatric patient with obesity: An Obesity Medical Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement 2022, Obes. Pillars source
The citation is attached to the statement that BMI is relatively simple to measure in adults. The Assessment of pediatric patients section describes using BMI percentiles for ages 2–20, but does not address how simple BMI is to measure in adults. Searches for adult BMI measurement and its simplicity found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [6] Southcombe, 2023, More than just body mass index: Using the Edmonton obesity staging system for pediatrics to define obesity severity in a multi-ethnic Australian pediatric clinical cohort, Obes. Sci. Pract. source
The Methods (BMI classification; page unavailable) describe routinely collecting BMI from measured height and weight, which supports the idea that it is relatively straightforward to obtain. The study concerns children aged 2–17, however, and does not address how simple BMI is to measure in adults. The citation is attached to that first clause, not the subsequent claim about complex body indicators. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [7] Licenziati, 2022, A height-weight formula to measure body fat in childhood obesity, Ital. J. Pediatr. source
The Background describes weight-and-height-based measures, including BMI, as practical and repeatable; the Methods say BMI is calculated from weight and height. This supports the claim that BMI is relatively simple to measure, but the paper studies children and does not specifically establish that point in adults. The citation is attached to the first clause, so the sentence’s separate claim about complex body indicators is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [8] Ryder, 2022, Metrics matter: Toward consensus reporting of BMI and weight-related outcomes in pediatric obesity clinical trials, Obesity source
The citation is attached to the claim that BMI is relatively simple to measure in adults. The paper’s main text (page unavailable) mentions adult use of BMI reduction thresholds, but does not address how simple BMI is to measure; searches for adult BMI measurement and simplicity found no supporting passage. The statement about complex body indicators follows the citation and is not attributed to this source here. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] Freedman, 2020, Distance and percentage distance from median BMI as alternatives to BMI z score, Br. J. Nutr. source
In Subjects and Methods > BMI Metrics (page unavailable), the paper describes calculating BMI from measured height and weight, supporting the point that it is relatively simple to obtain. The study sample comprises children aged 2–17, however, so it does not establish the claim specifically for adults. The citation is attached to the measurement clause, not the subsequent claim about body indicators. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe overweight BMI range included men with a low estimated body fat as well as men whose body fat percentage is compatible with obesity.
“Hence, the “overweight” range included men with a low estimated body fat as well as men whose body fat percentage is compatible with obesity [33].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Shah, N.R., and Braverman, E.R. (2012). Measuring adiposity in patients: The utility of body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, and leptin. PLoS ONE, 7. source
The Results (Table 2; page unavailable) report men with BMI below the obesity cutoff whose body-fat percentage met the obesity criterion, and Table 4 shows that BMI cutoffs within the overweight range do not cleanly separate obese from non-obese body-fat levels. The copy does not establish that men specifically in the overweight BMI range had *low* estimated body fat; its relevant category is the broader “non-obese” body-fat category. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIncorporating DEXA or BIA alongside BMI measurements can provide a more comprehensive assessment of body fat percentage and distribution.
“Incorporating body composition analysis techniques such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) alongside BMI measurements can provide a more comprehensive assessment of body fat percentage and distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Marra, 2019, Assessment of Body Composition in Health and Disease Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA): A Critical Overview, Contrast Media Mol. Imaging source
Section 3 explains that BMI cannot distinguish fat from nonfat mass, while Section 2.4 says DXA estimates whole-body and regional fat mass, supporting a more comprehensive assessment. The BIA sections describe estimates of body composition and fat mass, but do not establish that BIA assesses fat distribution. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigh BMI is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer, primary liver cancer, and cancer mortality.
“High BMI is also associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer [15], primary liver cancer, and cancer mortality [16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [15] Ma, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, P., Shi, C., Zou, Y., and Qin, H. (2013). Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: A systematic review of prospective studies. PLoS ONE, 8. source
- cites [16] Sohn, 2021, Obesity and the risk of primary liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin. Mol. Hepatol. source
The Results report that higher BMI is associated with primary liver cancer occurrence and liver cancer-related mortality. Citation [16] supports the primary liver cancer claim, but the paper's mortality finding is specific to liver cancer, not cancer mortality generally. The colorectal cancer claim is attached to [15], not this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBMI is a limited measure of body fat and invites misclassification of persons who are muscular or have larger bone structures.
“BMI does not measure body fat distribution (e.g., it does not recognize more harmful abdominal fat), is a limited measure of body fat (inviting misclassification of persons who are muscular or have larger bone structures) [11], and does not inform practitioners of either the origin or the heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes in specific individuals or populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Bray, G.A. (2023). Beyond BMI. Nutrients, 15. source
Section 4, “Anatomic Limitations” (page unavailable), says BMI has only a fair correlation with body fat and is limited for assessing an individual’s adiposity. The paper does not specifically say that BMI misclassifies muscular people or people with larger bone structures; its discussion of frame size in Section 2 concerns historical weight tables. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [11] (2024, May 27). Why Use BMI?. Available online: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/obesity-prevention-source/obesity-definition/obesity-definition-full-story/.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationObesity is a risk factor for death from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
“Obesity is a risk factor for death from SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19 disease), perhaps related to stress on lung capacity and complexities in ventilator management in intensive care settings [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Singh, 2022, Association of Obesity With COVID-19 Severity and Mortality: An Updated Systemic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression, Front. Endocrinol. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBMI estimates fat amount but is not precise in measuring fat distribution, such as abdominal fat or central fatness, which are better predictors of the risk of mortality.
“As mentioned previously, BMI estimates fat amount but is not precise in measuring fat distribution, as with abdominal fat or central fatness, which are better predictors of the risk of mortality [50].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Dong, B., Peng, Y., Wang, Z., Adegbija, O., Hu, J., Ma, J., and Ma, Y.H. (2018). Joint association between body fat and its distribution with all-cause mortality: A data linkage cohort study based on NHANES (1988–2011). PLoS ONE, 13. source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says BMI cannot determine body-fat distribution, and the Discussion (page unavailable) says waist–hip ratio provides additional information about distribution and is associated with mortality. The paper does not establish that abdominal or central fatness measures are better predictors of mortality than BMI. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSkinfold thickness is considered a valuable tool but requires considerable technical skill and experience to be measured accurately.
“Skinfold thickness is considered a valuable tool but requires considerable technical skill and experience to be measured accurately.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Holmes, C.J., and Racette, S.B. (2021). The Utility of Body Composition Assessment in Nutrition and Clinical Practice: An Overview of Current Methodology. Nutrients, 13. source
Section 3.3 (Skinfolds; page unavailable) describes skinfold measurement as an inexpensive way to estimate body fat, and Section 4 (Practical Applications; page unavailable) calls it an excellent option for assessing athletes’ body composition. The passages found do not say that accurate measurement requires considerable technical skill or experience. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBasing an obesity diagnosis solely on BMI can be inaccurate and may incur discriminatory and costly patient consequences.
“Basing an obesity diagnosis solely on BMI can be inaccurate and may incur discriminatory and costly patient consequences, as when employers increase employees’ health insurance costs if the BMI is above a given threshold [52].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Tomiyama, 2016, Misclassification of cardiometabolic health when using body mass index categories in NHANES 2005–2012, Int. J. Obes. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSemaglutide injections may not be covered by health insurance for people falling below certain BMI cut-offs, and a more comprehensive assessment could provide a more accurate assessment of need.
“Semaglutide injections may not be covered by health insurance for people falling below certain BMI cut-offs; a more comprehensive assessment could provide a more accurate assessment of need [60].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Chao, 2022, Clinical Insight on Semaglutide for Chronic Weight Management in Adults: Patient Selection and Special Considerations, Drug Des. Dev. Ther. source
The Insurance Coverage/Cost section identifies insurance coverage as a substantial barrier to semaglutide use. The Introduction gives BMI thresholds for medication candidacy and recommends personalized treatment decisions, but the paper does not say that insurers deny coverage below those thresholds or that a more comprehensive assessment would more accurately establish need. No page numbers were provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAlternative metrics such as waist-to-hip ratio or waist-to-height ratio in addition to BMI could offer a more comprehensive assessment of body composition and associated health risks in diverse populations.
“Exploring alternative metrics such as waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) or waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) in addition to BMI could offer a more comprehensive assessment of body composition and associated health risks in diverse populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Carvalho, V., Moreira, L.B., Luft, V.C., and Fuchs, S.C. (2023). Waist-to-Height Ratio: A Sensitive Tool for Assessing the Need for Nutritional Risk Management in Elderly Populations from Brazil. Healthcare, 11. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe relationship between BMI and percent body fat is highly variable by race, ethnicity, sex, and age, and these factors may interact.
“Apart from genetic factors, the relationship between BMI and percent body fat is highly variable by race, ethnicity, sex, and age (acknowledging that these simple constructs may mask more complex social elements), and these factors may interact [21].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Yang, 2015, Genetic variance estimation with imputed variants finds negligible missing heritability for human height and body mass index, Nat. Genet. source
The Online Methods describe adjusting BMI for age and standardizing it within sex groups, but do not examine percent body fat. Searches for the BMI–percent-body-fat relationship and for variation by race, ethnicity, sex, age, or their interactions found no passage addressing the attributed claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBMI is used to screen for macro-nutritional status, whether undernutrition, normal range, or overnutrition.
“Body mass index (BMI) is used to screen for macro-nutritional status, whether undernutrition, normal range, or overnutrition [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Eknoyan, 2008, Adolphe Quetelet (1796–1874)—The average man and indices of obesity, Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBMI was devised by Adolphe Quetelet in the 1830s to enable comparison of White middle-aged European men of varying heights via a common parameter.
“An individual’s weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared was devised by Adolphe Quetelet, a Belgian mathematician, in the 1830s to enable the comparison of White middle-aged European men of varying heights via a common parameter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Eknoyan, 2008, Adolphe Quetelet (1796–1874)—The average man and indices of obesity, Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe American Medical Association issued a report and policy recommendation in June 2023 urging medical professionals to do more comprehensive assessments of overweight and rely less on BMI.
“The American Medical Association (AMA) issued a report and policy recommendation in June 2023 that urged medical professionals to do more comprehensive assessments of overweight and rely less on BMI [23,24].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] (2023, June 14). AMA Adopts New Policy Clarifying Role of BMI as a Measure in Medicine. Available online: https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-adopts-new-policy-clarifying-role-bmi-measure-medicine#:~:text=Under%20the%20newly%20adopted%20policy,of%20non%2DHispanic%20white%20populations.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Tanne, 2023, Obesity: Avoid using BMI alone when evaluating patients, say US doctors’ leaders, BMJ source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWeight stigma affects people with obesity and can lead to delayed help-seeking, trouble finding social support, and impeded weight loss maintenance.
“Such negative stereotypes because of body weight, better termed “weight stigma”, affect people with obesity; persons feeling ashamed or embarrassed may hesitate to seek timely professional help, may have trouble finding needed social support, and can impede weight loss maintenance [19].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Puhl, 2020, Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity, Am. Psychol. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBMI remains popular as a simple, inexpensive clinical screening tool in patient medical encounters, though its limitations for individual patient forecasting are well documented.
“As a simple, inexpensive clinical screening tool, BMI remains popular in patient medical encounters, though its limitations for individual patient forecasting are well documented [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] (2021, May 05). Why BMI Is a Flawed Health Standard, Especially for People of Color. Available online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/wellness/healthy-bmi-obesity-race-/2021/05/04/655390f0-ad0d-11eb-acd3-24b44a57093a_story.html.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBMI does not measure functional health and fitness but is merely an anthropometric measure.
“BMI does not measure functional health and fitness but is merely an anthropometric measure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFour BMI categories are in common use today: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5-<25.0 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-<30.0 kg/m2), and obesity (≥30.0 kg/m2).
“Four categories of BMI are in common use today to estimate patient conditions: (1) underweight or undernourished status (<18.5 kg/m2); (2) normal BMI (18.5–<25.0 kg/m2); (3) overweight status (25.0–<30.0 kg/m2); and (4) persons with obesity as ≥30.0 kg/m2 [2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] (2010, May 06). A Healthy Lifestyle—WHO Recommendations. Available online: https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/a-healthy-lifestyle---who-recommendations.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOverweight status is associated with an increased risk of depressive disorder among adults.
“Overweight status is associated with an increased risk of depressive disorder among adults [18].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Luppino, 2010, Overweight, obesity, and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmong adults, BMI has been used to assess overweight status independent of age or sex, though its cut-offs for the elderly are debated.
“Among adults, BMI has been used to assess overweight status independent of age or sex [28], though its cut-offs for the elderly are debated [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [28] (2024, March 01). Obesity and Overweight. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Liu, 2023, Deciphering the “obesity paradox” in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sarcopenic obesity, Obes. Rev. source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBMI estimates adiposity crudely because muscles and bones have a higher density than fat, and some fat dispositions are worse than others.
“BMI estimates adiposity crudely, given that muscles and bones have a higher density than fat (adipose tissue), and some fat dispositions are worse than others, as with abdominal adiposity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPersons pursuing weight loss through diet and exercise can use BMI as an anchor assessment and track weight over time because height in adults is stable over the short term.
“Persons pursuing a weight loss plan through diet and exercise can use BMI as the anchor assessment and calculate weight goals with assistance from a primary care provider, enabling them to simply track weight over time since height in adults is stable over the short term [27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] (2011, August 02). Body Mass Index: Considerations for Practitioners, Available online: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/25368.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBMI has substantial utility in population-level statistics, summarizing current burdens of under- or over-nutrition and assessing trends in communities.
“BMI has substantial utility in population-level statistics, summarizing current burdens of under- or over-nutrition and assessing trends in communities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Commission in 2023 highlighted caveats in the definition and diagnosis of obesity.
“In their 2023 report, The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Commission highlighted similar caveats in the context of the definition and diagnosis of obesity [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Rubino, 2023, Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology Commission on the Definition and Diagnosis of Clinical Obesity, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningPolynesian body habitus may also differ, such that different cut-offs are appropriate.
“Polynesian body habitus may also differ, such that different cut-offs are appropriate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn HIV-infected breastfeeding South African mothers, BIS provided valid measures of fat-free mass, whereas BMI was helpful only in predicting fat mass.
“BIS in HIV-infected breastfeeding South African mothers provided valid measures of fat-free mass, whereas BMI was helpful only in predicting fat mass [63].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Papathakis, 2005, Comparison of isotope dilution with bioimpedance spectroscopy and anthropometry for assessment of body composition in asymptomatic HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected breastfeeding mothers, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEven with different cut-offs, changes over time may be valid for tracking changes within individuals and summarizing population trends.
“However, even with different cut-offs, changes over time may be valid for tracking changes within individuals and summarizing population trends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor the same BMI, females have a higher percent of fat than males, and for similar fat-free body mass, Black women had significantly more percent of fat and a higher body weight than White women.
“For example, for the same BMI, females have a higher percent of fat than males, and for similar fat-free body mass, Black women had significantly more percent of fat and, hence, a higher body weight than White women [54].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Jackson, 2002, The effect of sex, age and race on estimating percentage body fat from body mass index: The Heritage Family Study, Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationYoung Indians living in India have more visceral and abdominal fat and reduced glucose disposal rates than Caucasians with matched age and BMI.
“Young Indians living in India were found to have more visceral and abdominal fat and reduced glucose disposal rates than Caucasians with matched age and BMI [40].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Raji, 2001, Body Fat Distribution and Insulin Resistance in Healthy Asian Indians and Caucasians, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCross-sectional imaging can illustrate longitudinal changes in a single individual's body composition, but it is harder to interpret imaging for comparative predictions for groups of people.
“Though cross-sectional imaging can illustrate longitudinal changes in a single individual’s body composition, it is harder to interpret imaging for comparative predictions for groups of people [66].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] MacDonald, 2011, The advantages and limitations of cross-sectional body composition analysis, Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenImplementing the proposed recommendations can significantly improve the effectiveness of anthropometry in assessing population health and guiding clinical care.
“Implementing these recommendations can significantly improve the effectiveness of anthropometry in assessing population health and guiding clinical care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBMI will continue to be a simple and convenient tool for assessing macro-nutrition at the population level, though it does not measure micronutrients.
“BMI will continue to be a simple and convenient tool for assessing macro-nutrition at the population level, recognizing, of course, that BMI does not measure micronutrients [55].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Vermund, S., Scott, M., and Humphries, D. (2021). Public Health and Clinical Implications of Nutrition-Infection Interactions. Nutrition and Infectious Diseases Shifting the Clinical Paradigm: Shifting the Clinical Paradigm, Humana Press/Springer Nature Switzerland AG. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningHealthcare inequities are evident when one considers the cost and availability of advanced diagnostics in lower-resource settings.
“Healthcare inequities are evident when one considers the cost and availability of advanced diagnostics in lower-resource settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe obesity crisis or progress in reducing undernutrition cannot be assessed by BMI alone.
“The obesity crisis or progress in reducing undernutrition cannot be assessed by BMI alone; however, the global rise in obesity and decline in underweight are attributed to a shift in the population distribution of BMI, and this can mask social inequity both within and across populations [63].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWaist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio are relatively simple, low-cost measures that can better evaluate adiposity instead of an exclusive focus on excess weight.
“These measures are also relatively simple in the hands of trained practitioners and are low-cost; they can better evaluate adiposity instead of an exclusive focus on excess weight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMore extreme BMI findings have a high predictive utility for obesity-related medical conditions, as well as for undernutrition and cachexia.
“More extreme BMI findings have a high predictive utility for obesity-related medical conditions, as well as for undernutrition and cachexia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSemaglutide mimics the GLP-1 hormone released in the gastrointestinal tract with food challenges, stimulating more insulin production, reducing blood glucose, and promoting satiety sensations and appetite suppression.
“Work-to-date suggests that semaglutide mimics the GLP-1 hormone released in the gastrointestinal tract with food challenges, stimulating more insulin production, reducing blood glucose, and promoting satiety sensations and appetite suppression [59].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Phillips, 2022, Clinical review of subcutaneous semaglutide for obesity, J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBariatric surgery may be restricted to patients with a high BMI, and a more objective assessment such as co-incident type 2 diabetes could address the limitations of using BMI eligibility criteria alone.
“In healthcare systems, bariatric surgery may be restricted to patients with a high BMI (e.g., >35 kg/m2); a more objective assessment (co-incident type 2 diabetes, for example) could address the limitations of using BMI eligibility criteria alone [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] (2021, May 05). Why BMI Is a Flawed Health Standard, Especially for People of Color. Available online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/wellness/healthy-bmi-obesity-race-/2021/05/04/655390f0-ad0d-11eb-acd3-24b44a57093a_story.html.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenBMI is helpful when it is used as a screening test and population-appropriate cut-offs are used.
“The BMI is helpful when it is used as a screening test and population-appropriate cut-offs are used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGenetic factors play a significant role in obesity predisposition and response to weight management, and variations in genes related to metabolism, appetite regulation, and fat storage influence obesity susceptibility.
“Genetic factors play a significant role in obesity predisposition and response to weight management. Variations in genes related to metabolism, appetite regulation, and fat storage influence obesity susceptibility [42].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Tirthani, E., Said, M.S., and Rehman, A. (2024). Genetics and Obesity. StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing LLC.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation3DPS, PET, and SPECT are comparatively costly and complex imaging tools that assess adiposity and some physiological functions.
“Three-dimensional photonic scanning (3DPS), positron emission tomography (PET), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are comparatively costly and complex imaging tools that assess adiposity and some physiological functions [67].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] Santhanam, 2021, A systematic review of imaging studies of human brown adipose tissue, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWaist circumference assesses abdominal fat, with elevated values associated with a higher risk of metabolic diseases.
“Similarly, waist circumference, also measured with a tape measure, assesses abdominal fat, with elevated values associated with a higher risk of metabolic diseases [69].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] Chan, 2003, Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as predictors of adipose tissue compartments in men, QJM source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile BMI remains a cornerstone of public health surveillance and screening efforts, its limitations necessitate embracing emerging technologies and adopting a multifaceted approach to body composition assessment to better address the diverse needs of populations worldwide.
“While BMI remains a cornerstone of public health surveillance and screening efforts, its limitations necessitate the embracing of emerging technologies and adopting a multifaceted approach to body composition assessment to better address the diverse needs of populations worldwide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Radiation exposure in both DXA and CT is a disadvantage.
- Rests on an assumption: MRI requires one to be stable in a loud and noisy environment for a long time, which can be costly, tiring, and disruptive for patients, particularly those with claustrophobia.
- Rests on an assumption: Waist-to-hip ratio indicates fat distribution and serves as a reliable predictor of cardiovascular risk.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationMedical evaluations with greater predictive value need accurate measures and a definitive diagnosis of harmful adiposity, as well as functional assessments.
“Medical evaluations with greater predictive value need accurate measures and a definitive diagnosis of harmful adiposity, as well as functional assessments; such assessments encounter health system constraints of accessibility and affordability [64].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAdvances in data sciences and artificial intelligence may help address guideline discrepancies by refining criteria and cut-offs by key relevant cofactors like race, ethnicity, sex, age, and fitness.
“Advances in data sciences and artificial intelligence may help address guideline discrepancies by refining criteria and cut-offs by key relevant cofactors like race, ethnicity, sex, age, and fitness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenSimple, point-of-care assessment tools to better assess macro-nutritional status could supplant BMI as a screening tool of choice, but these are not yet affordable and/or validated.
“Simple, point-of-care assessment tools to better assess macro-nutritional status could supplant BMI as a screening tool of choice, but these are not yet affordable and/or validated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLean body mass is essential for evaluating muscle health and overall metabolic function.
“Lean body mass, essential for evaluating muscle health and overall metabolic function, measures the body’s mass excluding fat and can be assessed through DEXA scans, hydrostatic weighing, and bioelectrical impedance analysis [70].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] Roubenoff, 1991, The meaning and measurement of lean body mass, Nutr. Rev. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationDeveloping algorithms that integrate multiple data points can help healthcare providers tailor interventions and treatment plans more effectively to address obesity and its associated health risks.
“Developing algorithms that integrate multiple data points can help healthcare providers tailor interventions and treatment plans more effectively to address obesity and its associated health risks [66].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] MacDonald, 2011, The advantages and limitations of cross-sectional body composition analysis, Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningLeveraging data science and artificial intelligence to analyze interactions between body composition metrics and blood-derived variables can enhance the accuracy and predictive power of the innovative approach.
“Leveraging data science and artificial intelligence to analyze the complex interactions between body composition metrics and blood-derived variables can enhance the accuracy and predictive power of this innovative approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenWorkforce issues, including the need for skilled practitioners, test risks, and costs, determine the extent to which more complex approaches are useful in specific settings.
“Workforce issues must be considered in such optimization efforts, as the need for skilled practitioners, test risks, and costs are all factors that determine the extent to which more complex approaches are useful in specific settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningComparing BMI screening test efficiencies and population-specific predictive values may improve combinations of screening, diagnostic, and predictive tools, with BMI as a likely component of efficient algorithms.
“Such work may improve the specific combinations of screening, diagnostic, and predictive tools, with BMI as a likely component of efficient algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Radiation exposure in both DXA and CT is a disadvantage.
“Radiation exposure in both DXA and CT is a disadvantage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
MRI requires one to be stable in a loud and noisy environment for a long time, which can be costly, tiring, and disruptive for patients, particularly those with claustrophobia.
“Although MRI does not involve ionizing radiation, it requires one to be stable in a loud and noisy environment for a long time, which can be costly, tiring, and disruptive for patients, particularly those with claustrophobia.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Waist-to-hip ratio indicates fat distribution and serves as a reliable predictor of cardiovascular risk.
“The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), determined using a simple tape measure, indicates fat distribution and serves as a reliable predictor of cardiovascular risk.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
AMA report quotation cites a depression review
MinorThe quotation attributed to the 2023 AMA report cites reference 18, but reference 18 is a 2010 review about overweight, obesity, and depression, not an AMA report.
“The 2023 AMA report states: “There are issues with BMI in diagnosing obesity. Further measures are recommended for clinical use. BMI loses its predictability in assessing the fat mass on the individual level because of the body variation among different age, sex, and race groups. Therefore, BMI should not be used as the only criterion in decision- or policy-making” [18].”
“18. Luppino F.S. de Wit L.M. Bouvy P.F. Stijnen T. Cuijpers P. Penninx B.W. Zitman F.G. Overweight, obesity, and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2010 67 220 229”
Review claims a 2023 literature cutoff but cites 2024 publications
MinorThe abstract says the review covers publications through 2023, but the references include publications dated 2024, including reference 57, which is discussed in the text.
“The review covers studies and publications through 2023, encompassing consensus reviews and relevant literature.”
“57. Yang X. Hao X. Liu M. Hu Y. Wang X. Liu Y. The prevalence of obesity and relationship between obesity indicators and chronic diseases in Northern Shaanxi, China Endokrynol. Pol. 2024 75 71 82”
WHO obesity threshold excludes versus includes BMI 30
MinorThe prose defines the WHO obesity threshold as greater than 30 kg/m2, while Table 1 defines it as at least 30 kg/m2. These classify a BMI of exactly 30 differently.
“those with a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 as obese [3].”
“| Universal (1993 by WHO) [3] | * | 20–24.9 | 25–29.9 | ≥30 |”
Indian BMI thresholds disagree at 23 and 25
MinorThe prose excludes BMI 23 from overweight and BMI 25 from obesity, whereas Table 1 includes those respective boundary values.
“In 2015, in India, a BMI > 23 kg/m2 and <25 kg/m2 were regarded as overweight and >25 kg/m2 as obese for Indians [37].”
“| Indians in India (2015) [37] | * | * | 23–24.9 | ≥25 |”
Chinese overweight threshold excludes versus includes BMI 24
MinorThe prose says the Chinese overweight threshold is above 24 kg/m2, but Table 1 includes 24 kg/m2 in the overweight range.
“In 2002, guidelines for Chinese adults used yet another threshold for being overweight (BMI > 24 kg/m2)”
“| Chinese adults in China (2002) [36] | ≤18.5 | 18.6–23.9 | 24–27.9 | ≥28 |”
Cites
(1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e565682010-001 · Cited by 9,452 · see citing works
Overweight, Obesity, and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Longitudinal Studies
Luppino, F. S., de Wit, L. M., Bouvy, P. F., Stijnen, T., Cuijpers, P., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Zitman, F. G. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.2 · Cited by 4,322 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Therefore, BMI should not be used as the only criterion in decision-or policy-making” [18].”
Background(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 2,737 · see citing works
Body Mass Index: Obesity, BMI, and Health A Critical Review
Nuttall, F. Q. (2015) · Nutrition Today · doi:10.1097/nt.0000000000000092 · Cited by 2,284 · cited 5× · see citing works
“In contrast, the WHO classified people with a BMI be-tween 20 and 24.9 kg/m 2 as having normal weight, those with a BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m 2 as overweight, and those with a BMI greater than 30 kg/m 2 as obese [3].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAdolphe Quetelet (1796 1874) the average man and indices of obesity
Eknoyan, G. (2007) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm517 · Cited by 746 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Body mass index (BMI) is used to screen for macro-nutritional status, whether under-nutrition, normal range, or overnutrition [1].”
MethodStudy, T. L. C., Yang, J., Bakshi, A., Zhu, Z., Hemani, G., Vinkhuyzen, A. A. E., Lee, S. H., Robinson, M. R., Perry, J. R. B., Nolte, I. M., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3390 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Jackson, A., Stanforth, P., Gagnon, J., Rankinen, T., Leon, A., Rao, D., Skinner, J., Bouchard, C., & Wilmore, J. (2002) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802006 · Cited by 694 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, for the same BMI, females have a higher percent of fat than males, and for similar fat-free body mass, Black women had significantly more percent of fat and, hence, a higher body weight than White women [54].”
BackgroundAssessment methods in human body composition
Lee, S. Y., & Gallagher, D. (2008) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0b013e32830b5f23 · Cited by 694 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Multifrequency BIA and bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) both distinguish between intracellular and extracellular water to detect fluid shifts and evaluate hydration levels [62].”
BackgroundCarnethon, M. R. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.23.3092 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
Obesity and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies
Ma, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, P., Shi, C., Zou, Y., & Qin, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053916 · Cited by 622 · cited 1× · see citing works
“High BMI is also associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer [15], primary liver cancer, and cancer mortality [16].”
BackgroundDeurenberg-Yap, M., Schmidt, G., van Staveren, W., & Deurenberg, P. (2000) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801353 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites
Wang, J., Thornton, J. C., Bari, S., Williamson, B., Gallagher, D., Heymsfield, S. B., Horlick, M., Kotler, D., Laferrère, B., Mayer, L., et al. (2003) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/77.2.379 · Cited by 567 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Waist circumferences can assess body fat distribution by measuring the distance around the abdomen in different anatomical locations [56].”
BackgroundMeasuring adiposity in patients: the utility of body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, and leptin
Shah, N. R., & Braverman, E. R. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033308 · Cited by 554 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Hence, the “overweight” range included men with a low estimated body fat as well as men whose body fat percentage is compatible with obesity [33].”
BackgroundBody Fat Distribution and Insulin Resistance in Healthy Asian Indians and Caucasians
Raji, A., Seely, E. W., Arky, R. A., & Simonson, D. C. (2001) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.86.11.7992 · Cited by 541 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Young Indians living in India were found to have more visceral and abdominal fat and reduced glucose disposal rates than Caucasians with matched age and BMI [40].”
BackgroundWeight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity.
Puhl, R. M., Himmelstein, M. S., & Pearl, R. L. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000538 · Cited by 452 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such negative stereotypes because of body weight, better termed “weight stigma”, affect people with obesity; persons feeling ashamed or embarrassed may hesitate to seek timely professional help, may have trouble finding needed social support, and can impede weight loss maintenance [19].”
BackgroundCaleyachetty, R., Barber, T. M., Mohammed, N. I., Cappuccio, F. P., Hardy, R., Mathur, R., Banerjee, A., & Gill, P. (2021) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00088-7 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
(2002) · PubMed · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Holmes, C. J., & Racette, S. B. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13082493 · Cited by 402 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The integration of data considers the number of sites and their locations, with sex-specific adjustments [61].”
BackgroundMarra, M., Sammarco, R., De Lorenzo, A., Iellamo, F., Siervo, M., Pietrobelli, A., Donini, L. M., Santarpia, L., Cataldi, M., Pasanisi, F., et al. (2019) · Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1155/2019/3548284 · Cited by 401 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This offers a clearer picture of an individual’s health status and is advisable for clinical assessments [34].”
BackgroundGenetics and epigenetics in obesity
Rohde, K., Keller, M., la Cour Poulsen, L., Blüher, M., Kovacs, P., & Böttcher, Y. (2019) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2018.10.007 · Cited by 355 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, the genetics of obesity are not sufficient to account for the variability of BMI [20,21].”
BackgroundTomiyama, A. J., Hunger, J. M., Nguyen-Cuu, J., & Wells, C. (2016) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2016.17 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Reassessment of body mass indices
Smalley, K., Knerr, A., Kendrick, Z., Colliver, J., & Owen, O. (1990) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/52.3.405 · Cited by 306 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In a sample of men with a BMI of 27 kg/m 2 (characterized by BMI as overweight), the 95% confidence interval for body fat percentage varied from 10% to 32% [32].”
BackgroundMisra, A. (2015) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2015.0007 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Chan, D. C. (2003) · QJM · doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcg069 · Cited by 266 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similarly, waist circumference, also measured with a tape measure, assesses abdominal fat, with elevated values associated with a higher risk of metabolic diseases [69].”
BackgroundUsing appropriate body mass index cut points for overweight and obesity among Asian Americans
Jih, J., Mukherjea, A., Vittinghoff, E., Nguyen, T. T., Tsoh, J. Y., Fukuoka, Y., Bender, M. S., Tseng, W., & Kanaya, A. M. (2014) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.010 · Cited by 264 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A study of 5344 participants aged >55 years old suggested that the benefits of physical activity may compensate to some extent for the adverse predictions of a higher BMI [44].”
BackgroundLiu, C., Wong, P. Y., Chung, Y. L., Chow, S. K., Cheung, W. H., Law, S. W., Chan, J. C. N., & Wong, R. M. Y. (2023) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.13534 · Cited by 247 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Among adults, BMI has been used to assess overweight status independent of age or sex [28], though its cut-offs for the elderly are debated [30].”
BackgroundThe meaning and measurement of lean body mass
Roubenoff, R., & Kehayias, J. J. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1991.tb03013.x · Cited by 218 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Lean body mass, essential for evaluating muscle health and overall metabolic function, measures the body’s mass excluding fat and can be assessed through DEXA scans, hydrostatic weighing, and bioelectrical impedance analysis [70].”
BackgroundBray, G. A. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15102254 · Cited by 210 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Limitations are notable, as summarized by Bray [10]: BMI does not measure body fat distribution (e.g., it does not recognize more harmful abdominal fat), is a limited measure of body fat (inviting misclassification of persons who are muscular or have larger bone structures) [11], and does not inform…”
BackgroundSingh, R., Rathore, S. S., Khan, H., Karale, S., Chawla, Y., Iqbal, K., Bhurwal, A., Tekin, A., Jain, N., Mehra, I., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.780872 · Cited by 193 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Obesity is a risk factor for death from SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19 disease), perhaps related to stress on lung capacity and complexities in ventilator management in intensive care settings [17].”
BackgroundThe Natural Course of Healthy Obesity Over 20 Years
Bell, J. A., Hamer, M., Sabia, S., Singh‐Manoux, A., Batty, G. D., & Mika Kivimaki, B. (2015) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.077 · Cited by 191 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fitness must be assessed alongside other indicators [72,73].”
BackgroundObesity and the risk of primary liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Sohn, W., Lee, H. W., Lee, S., Lim, J. H., Lee, M. W., Park, C. H., & Yoon, S. K. (2021) · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology · doi:10.3350/cmh.2020.0176 · Cited by 177 · cited 1× · see citing works
“High BMI is also associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer [15], primary liver cancer, and cancer mortality [16].”
BackgroundKoolhaas, C. M., Dhana, K., Schoufour, J. D., Ikram, M. A., Kavousi, M., & Franco, O. H. (2017) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487317693952 · Cited by 162 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Ongoing research in genetics and obesity offers promise for innovative therapeutic approaches targeting genetic factors contributing to obesity and its effects [43–45].”
BackgroundAssociation of a Genetic Risk Score With Body Mass Index Across Different Birth Cohorts
Walter, S., Mejía-Guevara, I., Estrada, K., Liu, S. Y., & Glymour, M. M. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.8729 · Cited by 130 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Among US adults aged >50 years, a multilocus genetic risk score for BMI was estimated for participants born between 1900 and 1958; an interaction of birth cohort and known genetic variants with BMI suggested that genetic risks might be exacerbated by obesogenic exposures [53].”
BackgroundLancet Diabetes & Endocrinology Commission on the Definition and Diagnosis of Clinical Obesity
Rubino, F., Batterham, R. L., Koch, M., Mingrone, G., le Roux, C. W., Farooqi, I. S., Farpour-Lambert, N., Gregg, E. W., & Cummings, D. E. (2023) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00058-x · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Defining Obesity Cut-Off Points for Migrant South Asians
Gray, L. J., Yates, T., Davies, M. J., Brady, E., Webb, D. R., Sattar, N., & Khunti, K. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026464 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
The advantages and limitations of cross-sectional body composition analysis
MacDonald, A. J., Greig, C. A., & Baracos, V. (2011) · Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1097/spc.0b013e32834c49eb · Cited by 101 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Though cross-sectional imaging can illustrate longitudinal changes in a single individual’s body composition, it is harder to interpret imaging for comparative predictions for groups of people [66].”
BackgroundHeld, C., Hadziosmanovic, N., Aylward, P. E., Hagström, E., Hochman, J. S., Stewart, R. A. H., White, H. D., & Wallentin, L. (2022) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.121.023667 · Cited by 94 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A BMI below 20 kg/m 2 and a BMI of 35 kg/m 2 or higher were significant indicators of a poor prognosis [29].”
BackgroundFreedman, D. S., Butte, N. F., Taveras, E. M., Goodman, A. B., Ogden, C. L., & Blanck, H. M. (2017) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.03.039 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Obesity and eating behavior from the perspective of twin and genetic research
Silventoinen, K., & Konttinen, H. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.12.012 · Cited by 80 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…elements (e.g., parks, sidewalks, bicycle lanes) in the lived environment, affordability and availability of healthy foods (so-called “food deserts” are neighborhoods where fresh vegetables and fruits are not conveniently obtained), and marketing and promotion of unhealthy foods in society [22].”
BackgroundWhat is the Optimal Body Mass Index Range for Older Adults?
Kıskaç, M., Soysal, P., Smith, L., Capar, E., & Zorlu, M. (2022) · Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research · doi:10.4235/agmr.22.0012 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Darbandi, M., Pasdar, Y., Moradi, S., Mohamed, H. J. J., Hamzeh, B., & Salimi, Y. (2020) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd17.200112 · Cited by 76 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Healthcare providers and public health agencies alike recognize obesity to be a risk factor for multiple outcomes such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic orthopedic problems, accidents, collagen vascular diseases, lower quality of life, osteoarthritis, and autoimmune disorders [13,14].”
BackgroundSmartphone camera based assessment of adiposity: a validation study
Majmudar, M. D., Chandra, S., Yakkala, K., Kennedy, S., Agrawal, A., Sippel, M., Ramu, P., Chaudhri, A., Smith, B., Criminisi, A., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00628-3 · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“An automated computer vision method estimates total body fat via visual body composition (VBC) that uses two-dimensional photographs from a conventional smart-phone camera and convolutional neural network algorithms; validations were promising versus more burdensome DXA, BIA, and ADP measures [65].”
MethodMetabolically Healthy Obesity and Ischemic Heart Disease: A 10-Year Follow-Up of the Inter99 Study
Hansen, L., Netterstrøm, M. K., Johansen, N. B., Rønn, P. F., Vistisen, D., Husemoen, L. L. N., Jørgensen, M. E., Rod, N. H., & Færch, K. (2017) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2016-3346 · Cited by 73 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fitness must be assessed alongside other indicators [72,73].”
BackgroundNg, B. K., Liu, Y. E., Wang, W., Kelly, T. L., Wilson, K. E., Schoeller, D. A., Heymsfield, S. B., & Shepherd, J. A. (2018) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy158 · Cited by 73 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Uncommonly used in general medicine, a four-compartment model using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and air displacement plethysmography (ADP) measures the mineral content in the bone, while body volume and dilution techniques assess total body water [64].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRace, Ethnicity, Sex, and Obesity: Is It Time to Personalize the Scale?
Stanford, F. C., Lee, M., & Hur, C. (2019) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.10.014 · Cited by 61 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Standard BMI categories can lead to misclassification bias when considering age, ethnicity, race, sex, or metabolic disease risks for certain disorders [51].”
BackgroundChao, A. M., Tronieri, J. S., Amaro, A., & Wadden, T. A. (2022) · Drug Design, Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s365416 · Cited by 58 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Semaglutide injections may not be covered by health insurance for people falling below certain BMI cut-offs; a more comprehensive assessment could provide a more accurate assessment of need [60].”
BackgroundDistance and percentage distance from median BMI as alternatives to BMI <i>z</i> score
Freedman, D. S., Woo, J. G., Ogden, C. L., Xu, J. H., & Cole, T. J. (2020) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114519002046 · Cited by 49 · cited 2× · see citing works
“BMI is relatively simple to measure in adults [4–9] and functionally sums a variety of complex body indicators.”
BackgroundClinical review of subcutaneous semaglutide for obesity
Phillips, A., & Clements, J. N. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/jcpt.13574 · Cited by 49 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Work-to-date suggests that semaglu-tide mimics the GLP-1 hormone released in the gastrointestinal tract with food challenges, stimulating more insulin production, reducing blood glucose, and promoting satiety sensations and appetite suppression [59].”
BackgroundAlcazar, J., Navarrete-Villanueva, D., Mañas, A., Gómez-Cabello, A., Pedrero-Chamizo, R., Alegre, L. M., Villa, G., Gusi, N., González-Gross, M., Casajús, J. A., et al. (2021) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-103720 · Cited by 43 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…as the “fat but fit” paradigm or an “obesity paradox”, better mortality outcomes in persons with overweight or obesity may occur in certain race-ethnicity-sex-age strata [47,48], and fitness level must be considered while assessing the association between body weight and medical outcomes [49].”
BackgroundYerrakalva, D., Mullis, R., & Mant, J. (2015) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.21181 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Dong, B., Peng, Y., Wang, Z., Adegbija, O., Hu, J., Ma, J., & Ma, Y.-H. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193368 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As mentioned previously, BMI estimates fat amount but is not precise in measuring fat distribution, as with abdominal fat or central fatness, which are better predictors of the risk of mortality [50].”
BackgroundPapathakis, P., Rollins, N. C., Brown, K. H., Bennish, M. L., & Loan, M. D. V. (2005) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn.82.3.538 · Cited by 30 · cited 2× · see citing works
“BIS in HIV-infected breastfeeding South African mothers provided valid measures of fat-free mass, whereas BMI was helpful only in predicting fat mass [63].”
BackgroundRyder, J. R., Kelly, A. S., & Freedman, D. S. (2022) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.23346 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Papathakis, P. C., Rollins, N. C., Brown, K. H., Bennish, M. L., & Van Loan, M. D. (2005) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/82.3.538 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Obesity: Avoid using BMI alone when evaluating patients, say US doctors’ leaders
Tanne, J. H. (2023) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.p1400 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The American Medical Association (AMA) issued a report and policy recommendation in June 2023 that urged medical professionals to do more comprehensive assessments of overweight and rely less on BMI [23,24].”
BackgroundHigh body fat percentage is associated with primary aldosteronism: a cross-sectional study
Manosroi, W., & Atthakomol, P. (2020) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-020-00654-w · Cited by 18 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This metric can be evaluated through skinfold measurements, bioelectrical impedance analysis, DEXA scans, and hydrostatic weighing [68].”
MethodCuda, S. E., & Censani, M. (2022) · Obesity Pillars · doi:10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100010 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Carvalho, V. C. H. D. S., Moreira, L. B., Luft, V. C., & Fuchs, S. C. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11172406 · Cited by 10 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By considering multiple metrics, healthcare practitioners can personalize interventions and risk assessments to better meet individual needs, improving the effectiveness of preventive strategies and treatment plans [41].”
BackgroundA systematic review of imaging studies of human brown adipose tissue
Santhanam, P., Rowe, S. P., Solnes, L. B., Quainoo, B., & Ahima, R. S. (2021) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14579 · Cited by 9 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Three-dimensional photonic scanning (3DPS), positron emission tomography (PET), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are comparatively costly and complex imaging tools that assess adiposity and some physiological functions [67].”
BackgroundA height-weight formula to measure body fat in childhood obesity
Licenziati, M. R., Ballarin, G., Iannuzzo, G., Lonardo, M. S., Di Vincenzo, O., Iannuzzi, A., & Valerio, G. (2022) · Italian Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s13052-022-01285-8 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Southcombe, F., Vivekanandarajah, S., Krstic, S., Lin, F., Chay, P., Williams, M., Khan, J. R., Hu, N., Eapen, V., Dennis, S., et al. (2023) · Obesity Science & Practice · doi:10.1002/osp4.648 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Impact of Age and Body Composition on Bone Density among Office Worker Women in Hungary
Vári, B., Győri, F., Katona, Z., & Berki, T. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20115976 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Public Health and Clinical Implications of Nutrition-Infection Interactions
Vermund, S. H., Scott, M. E., & Humphries, D. L. (2021) · Nutrition and Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56913-6_16 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“BMI will continue to be a simple and convenient tool for assessing macro-nutrition at the population level, recognizing, of course, that BMI does not measure micronutrients [55].”
MethodSelf-citationYang, X., Hao, X., Liu, M., Hu, Y., Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Endokrynologia Polska · doi:10.5603/ep.96227 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The waist-to-height ratio was found to be associated with dyslipidemia and hyperuricemia in a sample of 4565 adults in China [57].”
BackgroundJae, S. Y., Kim, H. J., Lee, K. H., Kunutsor, S. K., Heffernan, K. S., Choi, Y.-H., & Kang, M. (2022) · Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention · doi:10.1097/hcr.0000000000000631 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The fat but fit paradox: what do we know in women with heart disease
Jin, K. (2022) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwac057 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- (2023, June 14). AMA Adopts New Policy Clarifying Role of BMI as a Measure in Medicine. Available online: https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-adopts-new-policy-clarifying-role-bmi-measure-medicine#:~:text=Under%20the%20newly%20adopted%20policy,of%20non%2DHispanic%20white%20populations.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ahmed, S. K., & Mohammed, R. A. (2025) · Metabolism Open · doi:10.1016/j.metop.2025.100375 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
“Because of this, researchers are calling for more sophisticated classification systems that take into consideration distribution of fat-visceral versus subcutaneous fat-metabolic health, and comorbid conditions [126,127].”
Ayesh, H., Nasser, S. A., Ferdinand, K. C., & Leon, B. G. C. (2025) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.124.325535 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Ketogenic Diets for Body Weight Loss: A Comparison with Other Diets
Dyńka, D., Rodzeń, Ł., Rodzeń, M., Pacholak-Klimas, A., Ede, G., Sethi, S., Łojko, D., Bartoń, K., Berry, K., Deptuła, A., et al. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17060965 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Importantly, however, BMI is an imperfect measure of body fat content (and therefore cannot replace clinical assessment), as it is affected by a number of factors, such as age, gender, and physical activity (and muscle content), although it works fairly well as a screening test [27,28].”
Beyond BMI: Rethinking Obesity Metrics and Cardiovascular Risk in the Era of Precision Medicine
Tănăsescu, M., Rosu, A.-M., Mincă, A., Rosu, A.-L., Grigorie, M., Timofte, D., & Ionescu, D. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15233025 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“This is critical in cardiovascular risk prediction, where visceral fat, rather than total body weight, is a stronger determinant of adverse outcomes [18].”
Abdulla, A., Sadida, H. Q., Jerobin, J., Elfaki, I., Mir, R., Mirza, S., Singh, M. K., Macha, M. A., Shahab Uddin, M. S., Fakhro, K. A., et al. (2024) · Journal of the National Cancer Center · doi:10.1016/j.jncc.2024.11.001 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“8 , 9 The normal ranges for BMI can vary significantly across different racial and ethnic groups due to genetic, environmental, and cultural factors.”
Itani, L., & Ghoch, M. E. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16223838 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Zhang, N., Xie, G., Jian, G., Jiang, K., Lu, Z., Wang, Z., Wang, J., Lan, H., Wang, W., He, S., et al. (2025) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-025-02990-4 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Liver and obesity: a narrative review
Lonardo, A., & Weiskirchen, R. (2025) · Exploration of Medicine · doi:10.37349/emed.2025.1001334 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Sakizlian, D. D. M., Boldeanu, L., Mitrea, A., Clenciu, D., Vladu, I. M., Plasiciuc, A. E. C., Șarla, A. V., Siloşi, I., Boldeanu, M. V., Assani, M.-Z., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26136227 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“This underscores the need for more nuanced approaches to risk assessment beyond traditional BMI categorizations [26,27].”
Maleki, F., Hosseinpour, M., Delpisheh, A., Bahardoust, M., Hajizadeh‐Sharafabad, F., & Pashaei, M. R. (2024) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/s12876-024-03446-x · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Functional Burden and Quality of Life in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study
Pavel, R. M. S., Purza, A. L., Ţiţ, D. M., et al. (2025) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina61071155 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“It also underscores the limitations of using BMI alone as a functional predictor, especially in clinical samples where body composition is not homogenous [46].”
Adekunle, O. A., Le, P., Gupta, D. Y., Rothberg, M. B., Tran, H. T., Yue, Y., & Gasoyan, H. (2025) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.16544 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Sarno, G., Reytor-González, C., Frías-Toral, E., Campuzano-Donoso, M., Katsanos, C. S., & Simancas‐Racines, D. (2025) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2025.06.010 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Intermittent fasting for adults with overweight or obesity
Garegnani, L., Oltra, G. V., Ivaldi, D., Burgos, M. A., Andrenacci, P. J., Rico, S., Boyd, M. J., Radler, D. R., Liquitay, C. M. E., & Eva Madrid, A. (2026) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd015610.pub2 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Zhang, Z., Ruan, X.-Y., & Ma, W. (2025) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1510218 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“First, BMI cannot distinguish between muscle mass and fat mass, leading to potential misclassification of obesity in individuals with high muscle mass but low body fat (14).”
Hajihashemi, P., Mohammadifard, N., Bateni, M., Haghighatdoost, F., Boshtam, M., Najafian, J., Sadeghi, M., Shabani, N., & Sarrafzadegan, N. (2025) · American Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.100936 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Association between body roundness index and sleep disorder: the mediating role of depression
Gong, H., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-06664-z · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“However, BMI fails to accurately capture fat distribution, particularly visceral fat [7, 8], which may be more closely associated with the onset of sleep disorders [9, 10].”
LORENZO, A. D., Itani, L., Ghoch, M. E., Gualtieri, P., Frank, G., Raffaelli, G., Pellegrini, M., & Renzo, L. D. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16152415 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“However, this traditional classification system has always been subject to criticism [13] due to several limitations [14,15], such as not fitting for all ethnicities (e.g., Asians) [16], and its inability to discriminate between the body compartments (e.g., bone, fat and muscle) [17].”
BackgroundLean MASLD and Cardiovascular Disease: A Review
Lebovics, N., Heering, G., Frishman, W. H., & Lebovics, E. (2025) · Cardiology in Review · doi:10.1097/crd.0000000000000893 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Przybyłowski, A., Górski, M. K., Gwioździk, W., & Polaniak, R. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13161967 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) are key indicators, with WC being particularly useful in identifying central or visceral obesity, a major risk factor for metabolic diseases [23,26].”
Lui, D. T. W., Fong, C. H. Y., Zou, X., Xu, A., Tse, H., Woo, J., Lam, T. H., WOO, Y. C., Cheung, B. M. Y., Janus, E. D., et al. (2026) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004749 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“It also does not inform practitioners of the heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes in specific individuals or populations [3].”
Lima, V. P., Cavalcante, E. D. O., Leão, M. A., LaFata, E. M., Sampaio, A. M., & Neto, P. R. N. (2024) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-024-01108-7 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“It correlates highly with direct measures of adiposity (e.g., dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) despite its limitations in assessing specific phenotypes of body composition (e.g., bodybuilders) and not to be able in distinguishing lean body mass from fat mass [33–35].”
Oh, J., Mun, W.-L., Lee, Y.-E., Roh, S.-Y., & Kim, G. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17020253 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“The obesity rate among Korean adolescents is already significantly higher than the East Asian regional average as defined by the WHO [31].”
Wagner, J. G., Chen, L., Jiang, F., et al. (2025) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research® · doi:10.1002/jor.26048 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The impact of obesity and lipids on cancer: Insights into mechanisms and potential interventions
Romero, M., Lian, Y., Piquer, A., Borràs-Ferré, N., Zorzano, A., & Ivanova, S. (2025) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2025.07.006 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Sepulveda, R. A. Y., Vasquez-Bonilla, A. A., Olivares, R., Olivares, P., Zavala-Crichton, J. P., Hinojosa-Torres, C., Muñoz-Strale, C., Giakoni-Ramírez, F., de Souza-Lima, J., Páez‐Herrera, J., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-15264-6 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Epidemiology and Natural History of Preclinical and Clinical Obesity: Insights From a UK Cohort
Zahid, S., Yao, Z., Grimes, S. N., Kim, A. H., Peng, A. W., Blumenthal, R., Arvanitis, M., Battle, A. J., & Blaha, M. J. (2026) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.70126 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Malik, Z., Sohn, W., & Williams, K. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13133856 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Milanese, C., Itani, L., Cavedon, V., & Ghoch, M. E. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17132162 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“This last fact relates to the classification categories of the BMI relying on broad ranges that are not widely accepted due to several limitations [11,12].”
Center Stage: Putting Obesity Staging Systems Into the Spotlight
Zahid, S., Peng, A. W., Razavi, A. C., Yao, Z., Blumenthal, R. S., & Blaha, M. J. (2025) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd22.250222 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Su, B., Cao, Y., Ma, L., & Huang, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1734041 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…recognized assessment index and the vast majority of existing epidemiological and clinical mechanistic studies employ this metric for grouping, it remains a relatively feasible perspective for integrating evidence from the literature and conducting risk strati fi cation at the present stage (4).”
Podeanu, M.-A., Vintilescu, Ş. B., Ionele, C. M., Sandu, R. E., Niculescu, C., Florescu, M. M., & Stepan, M. D. (2024) · Life · doi:10.3390/life14091206 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Over the years, various methods were used to assess body weight, but, until today, at populational level, the one that proved to be the most efficient was the BMI [51,52].”
MethodPiecuch, M., Chylak, M., Górski, M. K., Garbicz, J., Szczyrba, A., Buczkowska, M., Malinowska-Borowska, J., Nowak, J. U., Niedziela, J. T., Gąsior, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13216625 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“One of the reasons for this criticism is its inability to distinguish the variable proportion of body fat in body composition [4].”
BackgroundInfluentialGu, C., Kang, X., Chen, X., Long, Z., Yang, F., & Luo, W. (2025) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2025.1561990 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Miquel, J. J. G., López, P. J. T., Jansana, M. D. M., et al. (2025) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo15080495 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“However, BMI lacks the capacity to reflect fat distribution, particularly visceral adiposity, which plays a central role in the pathogenesis of MS [5].”
Mateos, I. C., Morales, C., & Aguilera, B. G. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14155434 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“However, body weight reduction alone does not discriminate accurately between body fat mass and lean mass or between visceral and subcutaneous fat distribution, which are clinical parameters that have been shown to be associated with changes in cardiometabolic risk [23–25].”
Wasiluk, A., Saczuk, J., & Asienkiewicz, R. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15121808 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Regression analyses between BMI and %BF revealed low coefficients of determination (R 2 ), particularly in the MUO and MHNW groups, indicating that BMI does not fully capture individual differences in fat content and distribution [21,22].”
Management of undernutrition during preconception and pregnancy in an urban setting in North India
Dhabhai, N., Chowdhury, R., Taneja, S., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1405247 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Body Composition and Its Outcomes and Management in Multiple Sclerosis: Narrative Review
Kidwell-Chandler, A. L., Jackson, J., Jeng, B., Silveira, S. L., Pilutti, L. A., Hibbing, P. R., & Motl, R. W. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17061021 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Alexandre, M., Poínhos, R., CRI-O Group, Oliveira, B. M. P. M., & Correia, F. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17111858 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Despite reliance on body mass index (BMI) for obesity diagnosis, BMI alone falls short in distinguishing between lean mass and fat mass or capturing fat distribution [12].”
Tu, J., Wu, B., Chen, H., & Guo, Y. (2025) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-025-01989-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Unlike BMI, which conflates lean mass with fat mass and fails to distinguish metabolically healthy obesity [30, 31], WWI employs mathematical modeling to eliminate confounding effects of height and total body weight [19, 29], thereby providing a more precise assessment of abdominal fat distribution…”
Moving away from BMI: a new era of diagnostic criteria in obesity
Sibal, R., Balamurugan, G., Graham, Y. N. H., & Mahawar, K. K. (2025) · Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1080/17446651.2025.2537160 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Exploring alternative anthropometric metrics such as waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) or Body Shape Index, in addition to BMI could offer a more comprehensive analysis of body composition and associated obesity-related health risks in diverse populations [42].”
Miguel, J. J. G., López, P. J. T., Jansana, M. D. M., López‐González, Á. A., Sbert, P. R., Busquets-Cortés, C., & Ramírez‐Manent, J. I. (2025) · Medical Sciences · doi:10.3390/medsci13030160 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Its inability to reflect fat distribution or differentiate between lean and adipose tissue limits its utility for detecting MASLD, particularly in cases of metabolically unhealthy normal weight or sarcopenic obesity [43,44].”
Predictive performance of traditional and novel anthropometric indices for diabetes and hypertension
Pezeshki, M., Esmaeili, S., Mahdavi‐Gorabi, A., Sadegi, T., Kiaee, Z. F., Assar, O., Semnani, K., & Qorbani, M. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes Investigation · doi:10.1111/jdi.70172 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Several additional anthropometric indices derived from these simple measurements (weight, height, and WC) have also been proposed to account for shortcomings associated with the sole use of these measures 7,8 .”
Tomasiewicz, A., Targowski, T., Makuch, S., et al. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17243843 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Uti, D. E., Omang, W. A., Alum, E. U., Ugwu, O. P.-C., Wokoma, M. A., Oplekwu, I. R., Atangwho, I. J., & Egbung, G. E. (2026) · Nutrition and Metabolic Insights · doi:10.1177/11786388251408961 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“28 Moreover, many healthcare systems lack standardized protocols for routine screening and early detection of obesity-related complications, particularly in pediatric and geriatric populations.”
Weber, C., Wind, D., Petzsch, P., Supprian, T., Dilthey, A., Christl, J., & Finzer, P. (2026) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-025-01941-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“This reflects some of the general limitations of the BMI in certain populations [78].”
InfluentialLim, Y., & Lee, S. K. (2026) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1844870 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“These fi ndings suggest that clinical obesity better captures the pathophysiological burden relevant to cardio-vascular events than BMI alone, which is an imperfect surrogate because it cannot differentiate fat from lean mass or capture fat distribution (29).”
Morvaridi, M., Behbahani, H. B., Alipour, M., Javid, A. Z., Keramatzadeh, S., Shokri, S., Tofighzadeh, P., Fayazfar, F., Dehkordi, H. S., Ghadimi, E., et al. (2025) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-025-04089-0 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Finally, the influence of BMI on MIS scores highlights the potential limitations of using BMI alone as a nutritional marker, as it does not account for body composition changes, such as muscle wasting, which are common in this population [48, 49].”
Wang, C., Huang, X., He, S., Kuang, M., Xie, G., Sheng, G., & Zou, Y. (2024) · Lipids in Health and Disease · doi:10.1186/s12944-024-02299-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“While BMI has long been used as the most common obesity indicator [14], it should be noted that BMI has limited ability to distinguish between lean body mass and fat, and does not accurately reflect actual BF across different genders and age groups [14–16].”
BackgroundRelationship Between Body Mass Index and Fat Mass Percentage with Proprioception in Children
Guzmán-Muñoz, E., Concha‐Cisternas, Y., Méndez-Rebolledo, G., et al. (2025) · Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology · doi:10.3390/jfmk10010059 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Soler, M. G., López, P. J. T., López‐González, Á. A., Paublini, H., Rifá, E. M.-A., Herrero, M. T. V., & Ramírez‐Manent, J. I. (2025) · Diabetology · doi:10.3390/diabetology6040032 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“However, BMI has significant limitations [17]: it does not distinguish between lean mass and fat, nor does it identify the distribution of adipose tissue, critical factors in determining IR.”
Alarfaj, S. J. (2025) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina61081393 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“However, BIA is not commonly used in clinical practice, making BMI the most practical choice to measure the effect on weight [42].”
Zahid, S., Peng, A. W., Razavi, A. C., Yao, Z., Blumenthal, R. S., & Blaha, M. J. (2025) · American Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101281 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Prospective associations of obesity heterogeneity, serum proteins, and carotid atherosclerosis risk
Zhong, H., Chen, J., Jia, S., et al. (2025) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105935 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“26 In addition, previous studies indicated that the prevalence of MHO was underestimated when defined based on BMI compared to DXA-derived BF%.”
Chen, Z., Li, J., Rao, H., Zhang, J., Xiao, Z., Sun, W., & Xiao, M. (2025) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12872-025-05135-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Traditional metrics, such as body mass index (BMI), are widely utilized but fail to distinguish between fat and lean mass, and cannot capture the heterogeneous health impacts of regional fat deposition [7, 8].”
Central Obesity: An Emerging Player in Cardiac Remodelling and Dysfunction
Suiunov, K., Mamazhakypov, A., Polupanov, A. G., Сакибаев, К. Ш., Kyzy, M. S., Asanbaev, C., Sydykov, A. S., & Калматович, К. Р. (2025) · Heart Lung and Circulation · doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2025.05.096 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Translating New Obesity Definitions Into Clinical Practice
Zahid, S., Yao, Z., Blumenthal, R. S., & Blaha, M. J. (2025) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2025.24909 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Nechita, L., Gurau, T. V., Mușat, C. L., et al. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15243238 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Although BMI has limitations in athletic populations due to higher lean mass [19], it remains a useful screening tool when interpreted alongside performance-specific parameters (Table 4).”
Multimodal (Bio)Markers and Risk of Obesity – A Comprehensive Scoping Review
Vahid, F., Loyola-Leyva, A., Tur, J. A., Bouzas, C., Devaux, Y., Malisoux, L., García-Hernández, S., Carvalho, M. D., Ródenas-Munar, M., Turner, J., et al. (2025) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100579 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Weighting health-related estimates in the GCAT cohort and the general population of Catalonia
Blay, N., Carrasco-Ribelles, L. A., Farré, X., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01284-9 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“This reinforces the notion that BMI measures may have limitations in accurately determining body composition and obesity 40 .”
Wu, R., Li, M., Liao, Y., Zhang, J., Xu, C., & Yan, X. J. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-24086-0 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Numerous studies have highlighted that reliance solely on BMI significantly underestimates the prevalence of obesity, as it fails to detect a substantial proportion of individuals with excessive body fat despite having a normal body weight [6].”
Hussain, M., Keyte, R., Kalika, E., & Mantzios, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1545056 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…the current studies used BMI as a biometric variable; however, given the ongoing discussions on the limitations of BMI as a health indicator (e.g., Wu et al., 2024), such as assessing excess fat, and differences in body build and ethnicity, future research should consider using alternative…”
Norton, H., Śliwińska-Stańczyk, P., Hala, T., et al. (2024) · Rheumatology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40744-024-00726-6 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Soheilifard, S., Faramarzi, E., & Mahdavi, R. (2025) · Journal of Health Population and Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s41043-025-00761-1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“BMI does not consider variations in body fat distribution, which impacts metabolic health, leading to the identification of distinct cardiometabolic risk markers [4, 5].”
Hu, D., Li, G., Ge, D., Ke, L., Shu, H., Chen, Y., & Hao, Z. (2025) · Lipids in Health and Disease · doi:10.1186/s12944-025-02497-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Additionally, the implications of obesity may vary across different ethnic groups for a given BMI [20, 21], such as in some Asian populations who exhibit a lower relative risk.”
Abernethy, D., Bennie, J. A., & Pavey, T. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes Research · doi:10.1155/jdr/7466757 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“As BMI does not distinguish between fat and lean mass, nor does it account for fat distribution, it may lead to less accurate interpretations of the combined e ff ects of PA and adiposity on the risk of diabetes [64].”
Cap, D. M., Dong, K. T., Nguyen, D. T. H., et al. (2025) · Obesity Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.obmed.2025.100600 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Park, S., Ning, H., Carnethon, M. R., & VanWagner, L. B. (2025) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.124.037948 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“74 Our study used the standard BMI cutoffs, which are higher than proposed cutoffs for men and White women, but are deemed sufficient, because they are viewed as a global measure of health along with other metrics in LS7 definitions.”
Alfaro, E., Aparicio, J. E. V., Escolano, R. V., et al. (2025) · Wellbeing Space and Society · doi:10.1016/j.wss.2025.100271 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Alonazi, A., Alsunaid, F., Alofaisan, L., Alqarni, M. G., Alhumoud, J., & Kashoo, F. Z. (2025) · Children · doi:10.3390/children12070899 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Golmohamadi, S., Murray, K., & Farrer, L. M. (2025) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101936 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Visceral Adiposity Index in Relation to Rotterdam Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Pluta, D., Staśczak, A., Stokowy, T., Migacz, M., Kochman, K., & Holecki, M. T. (2025) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13081997 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“BMI does not take into account the percentage of muscle and adipose tissue and is not specific to gender and ethnicity [27].”
Soliman, A. R., Ahmed, R. M., Meligi, A. A. H. E., Abo-Zeid, A. G., Amer, M. A., Atef, A., Yousry, A., Saleh, A. A., Fahmy, E. M., Makar, W., et al. (2025) · The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1186/s43162-025-00513-x · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“However, the clinical significance of elevated BMI lies not merely in weight classification but in its strong association with numerous serious health complications that significantly impact morbidity, mortality, and quality of life [4].”
Lee, M. J., Seo, B.-J., & Cho, J. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15101543 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Body mass index (BMI), calculated by dividing an individual’s weight in kilograms by the square of their height in meters (kg/m 2 ), is a widely used indicator of obesity as it reflects body fat composition with relatively high accuracy [25].”
Choa, R., Miller, K., Joshi, A., et al. (2025) · Blood Immunology & Cellular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.bict.2025.100015 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Yin, S., Su, J., Bao, J., Yu, H., Liu, M., & Ji, X. (2025) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/s40520-025-03215-0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Yaşar, O. M., Gürses, V. V., Ciğerci, A. E., Bal, E., Pehlivan, Y., Baş, M., Malkoç, N., Bektaş, M., Başkaya, G., Dündar, S., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1700684 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Body mass index (BMI), calculated as body mass in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/ m 2 ), is one of the most widely used indices for estimating adiposity in both clinical and young active adults settings (12–16).”
Sharing approaches in predictive genomics across animals, plants and humans
Arirangan, S., de Oliveira, L. F., Hasan, M. N., Sherman, A. B., Tuinstra, M. R., Brito, L. F., Wedow, R., & Tegtmeyer, M. (2026) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02491-w · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ahmed, I. S., Tapponi, S. L., Manaa, H. M., Soltani, A., Hussein, E. S., Parvaresh, F. A., & Hussain, Z. (2026) · Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1155/jobe/6556057 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Chaudhary, P., Yang, S., Waldrop, S., et al. (2026) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.70198 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Body mass index (BMI) percentiles cannot distinguish fat from lean mass or capture visceral adiposity, metabolic dysfunction, or functional limitations [3].”
Gunnarsson, S., Karlsson, C., Prasad, R. B., & Hansson, S. F. (2026) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106272 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Davey, C. H., Duwadi, D., Phillips, J. C., et al. (2024) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-024-04509-6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Current consensus reviews indicate that BMI serves as an important tool for healthcare screenings and population surveys, but it is limited in its ability to predict accurately chronic disease risk and assessing excess body fat [60].”
InfluentialBarros, A. Q. S., Aguiar, Í. W. O., Adriano, L. S., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1467339 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Abdullah, N., Goh, Y., Khuzaimi, A. N., Arifin, A. S. K., Yusuf, N. A. M., Jalal, N. A., Ismail, N., Husin, N. F., Kamaruddin, M. A., & Jamal, R. A. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1111/1753-0407.70039 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“While body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist- to-height ratio provide useful information on obesity and fat accumulation, they do not offer insights into muscle mass, which plays a crucial role in glucose metabolism [13].”
Gu, P., Shi, B., Zhang, Z., et al. (2025) · Journal of Health Population and Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s41043-025-00914-2 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“For instance, individuals with well-developed muscles may be misclassified as over-weight, while those with normal body weight but excessive visceral fat might be overlooked [28].”
Self-citationLee, G. Y., Lee, J., Kim, J., Chung, K., & Han, S. N. (2025) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-025-03713-x · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Suratkal, J. P., D'Silva, T., & AlHilli, M. M. (2025) · Gynecologic Oncology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.gore.2025.101718 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Kapellou, A., Fotis, T., Vrachnos, D. M., Salata, E., Ntoumou, E., Papailia, S. I., & Vittas, S. (2025) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13081791 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Body mass index (BMI) is a widely used metric for classifying weight status, with a BMI of 25–29.9 kg/m 2 indicating overweight and a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 defining obesity; both are associated with increased health risks [11,12].”
InfluentialThe Whole Day Movement Matters to Executive Function Among College Students
Zhang, X., Moss, S., Wu, C., Keller, J., & Gu, X. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15081129 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Although a useful tool, using BMI as a sole measurement of weight status without other anthropometric measures may not adequately capture known health risks (Wu et al., 2024).”
Pertegaz, P. G., López, P. J. T., Campayo, I. C., Busquets-Cortés, C., López‐González, Á. A., & Ramírez‐Manent, J. I. (2025) · Medical Sciences · doi:10.3390/medsci13030153 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“BMI does not distinguish between fat and lean mass, nor does it provide information on fat distribution, often leading to misclassification—particularly among individuals with sarcopenic obesity or normal-weight central adiposity [16,17].”
Solé, B., Montejo, L., Budde, M., Valentí, M., Borràs, R., Martin‐Parra, S., Ruiz, A. L., Martínez‐Arán, A., Adorjan, K., Heilbronner, M., et al. (2025) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.70028 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Its simplicity and ease of calculation also make it practical for clinical and public health applications [63].”
Mąkosza, K. M., Wierzgoń, J., Muc‐Wierzgoń, M., et al. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17162654 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Incorporating body composition analysis and routine nutritional screening may improve risk stratification and support personalized dietary counseling and therapeutic planning [53].”
Cabrera, C. I. T., Capote, D. G., López, P. J. T., et al. (2025) · Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.artere.2026.500871 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Nikalansooriya, A., Waidyarathna, G. R. N. N., Kaththiriarachchi, L., & Chandrasekara, A. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.96189 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Furthermore, the universal BMI cut-off may not be suitable for all populations, restricting its effectiveness as a precise screening tool for assessing undernutrition in adults [43].”
Geeitha, S., Muthugowtham, S., Rubankumar, M., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Innovative Data Communication Technologies and Application (ICIDCA) · doi:10.1109/icidca66325.2025.11280549 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“BMI is insufficient for accurate individual risk identification; it can direct dietary and exercise guidance [7].”
Liu, M., Pei, J., Zeng, C., Xin, Y., Tang, P., & Hu, X. (2025) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/s12937-025-01251-0 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Although BMI is commonly utilized to gauge obesity, it fails to differentiate between fat distribution and muscle mass [14], which is problematic since abdominal fat is closely linked to cardiovascular risk, making fat distribution a more critical factor than overall weight [15, 16].”
Abbaspour, F., Shafiee, G., Golestani, A., Birjandi, S. M., Gohari, K., Sheidaei, A., & Heshmat, R. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40200-025-01805-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“However, BMI cannot accurately assess body fat, health status, or associated risks, as it does not distinguish between fat and lean tissue [ 4 ].”
Tu, J., Yi, T.-P., & Tu, M.-Q. (2025) · The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine · doi:10.1177/00912174251410075 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Pilatti, J., Oliveira, L. J. G. D., Carlesso, L. C., et al. (2026) · BMC Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s40795-025-01218-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Because BMI reflects both nutritional intake and body composition, it remains a simple yet valuable tool for identifying individuals at higher risk of musculoskeletal impairment [58].”
- Authors
- Wu, Y., Li, D., & Vermund, S. H.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vermund, Sten H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-06-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 757
- ISSN
- 1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11204233
- OpenAlex
- W4399491352
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 168 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 16
- FWCI
- 77.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- body mass index, adult obesity, obesity screening, anthropometry, body composition, physical fitness, chronic disease risk prediction, semaglutide, obesity diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Obesity, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review