Cited by 335Body Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, DietDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Advantages and Limitations of the Body Mass Index (BMI) to Assess Adult Obesity

Open access
Wu, Yilun, Li, Dan, Vermund, Sten H.·2024·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Obesity reflects excessive fat deposits. At-risk individuals are guided by healthcare professionals to eat fewer calories and exercise more, often using body mass index (BMI; weight/height2) thresholds for screening and to guide progress and prognosis. By conducting a mini-narrative review of original articles, websites, editorials, commentaries, and guidelines, we sought to place BMI in the context of its appropriate use in population health, clinical screening, and monitoring in clinical care. The review covers studies and publications through 2023, encompassing consensus reviews and relevant literature. Recent consensus reviews suggest that BMI is a valuable tool for population surveys and primary healthcare screening but has limitations in predicting the risk of chronic diseases and assessing excess fat. BMI can guide nutritional and exercise counseling, even if it is inadequate for reliable individual risk prediction. BMI cut-offs must be reconsidered in populations of varying body build, age, and/or ethnicity. Since BMI-diagnosed overweight persons are sometimes physically and physiologically fit by other indicators, persons who are overweight on BMI should be more fully evaluated, diagnosed, and monitored with combined anthropometric and performance metrics to better clarify risks. The use of combined anthropometric and performance metrics involves integrating measurements of body composition with assessments of physical function and fitness to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of an individual’s health and fitness status. Eligibility for bariatric surgery or semaglutide satiety/appetite-reduction medications should not be determined by BMI alone. Awareness of the advantages and limitations of using BMI as a tool to assess adult obesity can maximize its appropriate use in the context of population health and in rapid clinical screening and evaluation.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This mini-narrative review argues that BMI remains useful for population surveillance and rapid primary-care screening but is inadequate for individual risk prediction, body-fat assessment, and universal cut-offs. It recommends combining BMI with anthropometric, body-composition, and performance/fitness metrics and avoiding BMI alone for treatment eligibility.

Key findings

  • BMI is simple, inexpensive, and useful for population trends and screening, but it does not measure body fat distribution, functional health/fitness, or the heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes.
  • BMI cut-offs vary by institution and population: NIH 1993 used overweight ≥27.8 kg/m² for men and ≥27.3 kg/m² for women; WHO 1993 used normal 20–24.9, overweight 25–29.9, and obesity ≥30; Chinese adults 2002 used overweight 24–27.9 and obesity ≥28; Indians 2015 used overweight 23–24.9 and obesity ≥25; South Asians 2023 used overweight ≥23.
  • Misclassification and risk-prediction limits are reported: in 40,420 US adults aged >18 years, modeled results suggested >70 million US adults would be misclassified as cardiometabolically healthy or unhealthy by BMI; in 899 women, lean but unfit women had higher all-cause mortality risk than overweight but more fit women; in 15,828 patients with stable coronary heart disease, risk factors rose above BMI 25 kg/m², BMI <20 and ≥35 kg/m² indicated poor prognosis, and lowest all-cause/cardiovascular mortality was at BMI 25–35 kg/m².
  • Body fat varies widely at the same BMI: men with BMI 27 kg/m² had a 95% CI for body fat percentage from 10% to 32%, and the BMI cutoff for type 2 diabetes risk equivalent to 25 kg/m² in White populations was as low as 19.2 kg/m² in South Asians.

Methods

  • Mini-narrative review, not a formal scoping review; the authors searched Google Scholar for popular scientific articles and news critiquing BMI, searched PubMed for principal scientific peer views, and obtained alternative or complementary measures from the CDC, NIH, The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Commission, AMA, and WHO, and assessed the AMA Council on Science and Public Health critique of BMI.
  • The review covers studies and publications through 2023, encompassing consensus reviews and relevant literature.
  • No systematic search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, quality appraisal, or quantitative synthesis is reported.

Limitations

  • Stated: the authors describe the work as a mini-narrative review rather than a formal scoping review.
  • Evident: no systematic search dates, search strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, risk-of-bias assessment, or meta-analysis are provided, so conclusions rely on selected literature and consensus reports.
  • Evident: the cited numerical findings come from heterogeneous studies with different populations and designs, and the paper does not pool them or formally compare their predictive performance.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph21060757

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

48 of 92 cited sources checked · 16 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    BMI does not measure body fat distribution, such as more harmful abdominal fat.

    “BMI does not measure body fat distribution (e.g., it does not recognize more harmful abdominal fat), is a limited measure of body fat (inviting misclassification of persons who are muscular or have larger bone structures) [11], and does not inform practitioners of either the origin or the heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes in specific individuals or populations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Bray, G.A. (2023). Beyond BMI. Nutrients, 15. source
  • Premisecitation

    In patients with coronary heart disease, the lowest rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were observed in the BMI range of 25 to 35 kg/m2.

    “Nevertheless, the lowest rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among these patients with coronary heart disease were observed in the BMI range of 25 to 35 kg/m2, suggesting that BMI alone is too simplistic to give a comprehensive risk assessment in a clinical setting without consideration of many other factors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Held, 2022, Body Mass Index and Association With Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease—A STABILITY Substudy, J. Am. Heart Assoc. source
  • Premisecitation

    BMI does not inform practitioners of the origin or heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes in specific individuals or populations.

    “BMI does not measure body fat distribution (e.g., it does not recognize more harmful abdominal fat), is a limited measure of body fat (inviting misclassification of persons who are muscular or have larger bone structures) [11], and does not inform practitioners of either the origin or the heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes in specific individuals or populations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Bray, G.A. (2023). Beyond BMI. Nutrients, 15. source

      The Abstract and Section 5 state that BMI does not reveal obesity’s underlying causes or heterogeneity. Section 8 says evaluating its impacts on an individual requires additional information. Our copy does not establish the further claim that BMI cannot inform practitioners about variation in outcomes across specific populations; it describes BMI as useful for tracking population trends. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The genetics of obesity are not sufficient to account for the variability of BMI.

    “However, the genetics of obesity are not sufficient to account for the variability of BMI [20,21].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [20] Rohde, 2019, Genetics and epigenetics in obesity, Metabolism source
    • cites [21] Yang, 2015, Genetic variance estimation with imputed variants finds negligible missing heritability for human height and body mass index, Nat. Genet. source
  • Premisecitation

    BMI was developed originally from a single sample of White, middle-aged European men.

    “BMI was developed originally from a single sample of White, middle-aged European men [3].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Nuttall, 2015, Body Mass Index: Obesity, BMI, and Health: A Critical Review, Nutr. Today source

      The “Lambert Adolph Jacque Quetelet” section says Quetelet identified the weight-to-height-squared relationship in normal young adults, and “Mathematical Adjustment of Body Build” says he developed the Quetelet Index in the 1800s. Our copy does not say it came from a single sample of White European men; its description of young adults also conflicts with “middle-aged.” No page numbers were supplied for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 36
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BMI cut-offs may not hold the same predictive value for individuals over the age of 65 as they do for younger adults, and modest overweight status may not carry the same health implications for the older population.

    “BMI cut-offs may not hold the same predictive value for individuals over the age of 65 as they do for younger adults, as modest overweight status may not carry the same health implications for the older population [31].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] Soysal, 2022, What is the Optimal Body Mass Index Range for Older Adults?, Ann. Geriatr. Med. Res. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Obesity is a risk factor for multiple outcomes such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic orthopedic problems, accidents, collagen vascular diseases, lower quality of life, osteoarthritis, and autoimmune disorders.

    “Healthcare providers and public health agencies alike recognize obesity to be a risk factor for multiple outcomes such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic orthopedic problems, accidents, collagen vascular diseases, lower quality of life, osteoarthritis, and autoimmune disorders [13,14].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] Darbandi, 2020, Discriminatory Capacity of Anthropometric Indices for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Prev. Chronic Dis. source

      The Introduction identifies obesity as a CVD risk factor, and the Discussion links excess fat accumulation to features of diabetes. The supplied passages do not support the additional claims about orthopedic problems, accidents, collagen vascular diseases, lower quality of life, osteoarthritis, or autoimmune disorders. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [14] (2024, February 20). Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/healthy-weight-growth/about/index.html.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Higher BMI is influenced heavily by sedentary lifestyles, structural elements in the lived environment, affordability and availability of healthy foods, and marketing and promotion of unhealthy foods.

    “Higher BMI is influenced heavily by sedentary lifestyles, structural elements (e.g., parks, sidewalks, bicycle lanes) in the lived environment, affordability and availability of healthy foods (so-called “food deserts” are neighborhoods where fresh vegetables and fruits are not conveniently obtained), and marketing and promotion of unhealthy foods in society [22].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Silventoinen, 2020, Obesity and eating behavior from the perspective of twin and genetic research, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. source

      The Introduction links physical activity to weight control and suggests that increased availability of processed fast food contributed to the obesity epidemic. It does not establish effects of parks, sidewalks, bicycle lanes, healthy-food affordability or “food deserts,” or marketing; it says the specific factors behind obesogenic environments remain poorly understood. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BMI is relatively simple to measure in adults and functionally sums a variety of complex body indicators.

    “BMI is relatively simple to measure in adults [4,5,6,7,8,9] and functionally sums a variety of complex body indicators.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim6 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [4] Freedman, 2017, The Limitations of Transforming Very High Body Mass Indexes into z-Scores among 8.7 Million 2- to 4-Year-Old Children, J. Pediatr. source

      The Methods section (page unavailable) calculates BMI from weight and height, consistent with BMI being a relatively simple measure. But the paper studies young children and does not address ease of measurement in adults. Its Discussion (page unavailable) compares BMI metrics with adiposity measures; it does not establish that BMI sums a variety of body indicators. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [5] Cuda, 2022, Assessment, differential diagnosis, and initial clinical evaluation of the pediatric patient with obesity: An Obesity Medical Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement 2022, Obes. Pillars source

      The citation is attached to the statement that BMI is relatively simple to measure in adults. The Assessment of pediatric patients section describes using BMI percentiles for ages 2–20, but does not address how simple BMI is to measure in adults. Searches for adult BMI measurement and its simplicity found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [6] Southcombe, 2023, More than just body mass index: Using the Edmonton obesity staging system for pediatrics to define obesity severity in a multi-ethnic Australian pediatric clinical cohort, Obes. Sci. Pract. source

      The Methods (BMI classification; page unavailable) describe routinely collecting BMI from measured height and weight, which supports the idea that it is relatively straightforward to obtain. The study concerns children aged 2–17, however, and does not address how simple BMI is to measure in adults. The citation is attached to that first clause, not the subsequent claim about complex body indicators. (LLM, conf=0.81)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [7] Licenziati, 2022, A height-weight formula to measure body fat in childhood obesity, Ital. J. Pediatr. source

      The Background describes weight-and-height-based measures, including BMI, as practical and repeatable; the Methods say BMI is calculated from weight and height. This supports the claim that BMI is relatively simple to measure, but the paper studies children and does not specifically establish that point in adults. The citation is attached to the first clause, so the sentence’s separate claim about complex body indicators is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [8] Ryder, 2022, Metrics matter: Toward consensus reporting of BMI and weight-related outcomes in pediatric obesity clinical trials, Obesity source

      The citation is attached to the claim that BMI is relatively simple to measure in adults. The paper’s main text (page unavailable) mentions adult use of BMI reduction thresholds, but does not address how simple BMI is to measure; searches for adult BMI measurement and simplicity found no supporting passage. The statement about complex body indicators follows the citation and is not attributed to this source here. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [9] Freedman, 2020, Distance and percentage distance from median BMI as alternatives to BMI z score, Br. J. Nutr. source

      In Subjects and Methods > BMI Metrics (page unavailable), the paper describes calculating BMI from measured height and weight, supporting the point that it is relatively simple to obtain. The study sample comprises children aged 2–17, however, so it does not establish the claim specifically for adults. The citation is attached to the measurement clause, not the subsequent claim about body indicators. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The overweight BMI range included men with a low estimated body fat as well as men whose body fat percentage is compatible with obesity.

    “Hence, the “overweight” range included men with a low estimated body fat as well as men whose body fat percentage is compatible with obesity [33].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Shah, N.R., and Braverman, E.R. (2012). Measuring adiposity in patients: The utility of body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, and leptin. PLoS ONE, 7. source

      The Results (Table 2; page unavailable) report men with BMI below the obesity cutoff whose body-fat percentage met the obesity criterion, and Table 4 shows that BMI cutoffs within the overweight range do not cleanly separate obese from non-obese body-fat levels. The copy does not establish that men specifically in the overweight BMI range had *low* estimated body fat; its relevant category is the broader “non-obese” body-fat category. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Incorporating DEXA or BIA alongside BMI measurements can provide a more comprehensive assessment of body fat percentage and distribution.

    “Incorporating body composition analysis techniques such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) alongside BMI measurements can provide a more comprehensive assessment of body fat percentage and distribution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] Marra, 2019, Assessment of Body Composition in Health and Disease Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA): A Critical Overview, Contrast Media Mol. Imaging source

      Section 3 explains that BMI cannot distinguish fat from nonfat mass, while Section 2.4 says DXA estimates whole-body and regional fat mass, supporting a more comprehensive assessment. The BIA sections describe estimates of body composition and fat mass, but do not establish that BIA assesses fat distribution. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    High BMI is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer, primary liver cancer, and cancer mortality.

    “High BMI is also associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer [15], primary liver cancer, and cancer mortality [16].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [15] Ma, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, P., Shi, C., Zou, Y., and Qin, H. (2013). Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: A systematic review of prospective studies. PLoS ONE, 8. source
    • cites [16] Sohn, 2021, Obesity and the risk of primary liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin. Mol. Hepatol. source

      The Results report that higher BMI is associated with primary liver cancer occurrence and liver cancer-related mortality. Citation [16] supports the primary liver cancer claim, but the paper's mortality finding is specific to liver cancer, not cancer mortality generally. The colorectal cancer claim is attached to [15], not this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BMI is a limited measure of body fat and invites misclassification of persons who are muscular or have larger bone structures.

    “BMI does not measure body fat distribution (e.g., it does not recognize more harmful abdominal fat), is a limited measure of body fat (inviting misclassification of persons who are muscular or have larger bone structures) [11], and does not inform practitioners of either the origin or the heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes in specific individuals or populations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [10] Bray, G.A. (2023). Beyond BMI. Nutrients, 15. source

      Section 4, “Anatomic Limitations” (page unavailable), says BMI has only a fair correlation with body fat and is limited for assessing an individual’s adiposity. The paper does not specifically say that BMI misclassifies muscular people or people with larger bone structures; its discussion of frame size in Section 2 concerns historical weight tables. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [11] (2024, May 27). Why Use BMI?. Available online: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/obesity-prevention-source/obesity-definition/obesity-definition-full-story/.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Obesity is a risk factor for death from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    “Obesity is a risk factor for death from SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19 disease), perhaps related to stress on lung capacity and complexities in ventilator management in intensive care settings [17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Singh, 2022, Association of Obesity With COVID-19 Severity and Mortality: An Updated Systemic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression, Front. Endocrinol. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BMI estimates fat amount but is not precise in measuring fat distribution, such as abdominal fat or central fatness, which are better predictors of the risk of mortality.

    “As mentioned previously, BMI estimates fat amount but is not precise in measuring fat distribution, as with abdominal fat or central fatness, which are better predictors of the risk of mortality [50].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] Dong, B., Peng, Y., Wang, Z., Adegbija, O., Hu, J., Ma, J., and Ma, Y.H. (2018). Joint association between body fat and its distribution with all-cause mortality: A data linkage cohort study based on NHANES (1988–2011). PLoS ONE, 13. source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) says BMI cannot determine body-fat distribution, and the Discussion (page unavailable) says waist–hip ratio provides additional information about distribution and is associated with mortality. The paper does not establish that abdominal or central fatness measures are better predictors of mortality than BMI. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Skinfold thickness is considered a valuable tool but requires considerable technical skill and experience to be measured accurately.

    “Skinfold thickness is considered a valuable tool but requires considerable technical skill and experience to be measured accurately.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] Holmes, C.J., and Racette, S.B. (2021). The Utility of Body Composition Assessment in Nutrition and Clinical Practice: An Overview of Current Methodology. Nutrients, 13. source

      Section 3.3 (Skinfolds; page unavailable) describes skinfold measurement as an inexpensive way to estimate body fat, and Section 4 (Practical Applications; page unavailable) calls it an excellent option for assessing athletes’ body composition. The passages found do not say that accurate measurement requires considerable technical skill or experience. (LLM, conf=0.81)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Basing an obesity diagnosis solely on BMI can be inaccurate and may incur discriminatory and costly patient consequences.

    “Basing an obesity diagnosis solely on BMI can be inaccurate and may incur discriminatory and costly patient consequences, as when employers increase employees’ health insurance costs if the BMI is above a given threshold [52].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Tomiyama, 2016, Misclassification of cardiometabolic health when using body mass index categories in NHANES 2005–2012, Int. J. Obes. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Semaglutide injections may not be covered by health insurance for people falling below certain BMI cut-offs, and a more comprehensive assessment could provide a more accurate assessment of need.

    “Semaglutide injections may not be covered by health insurance for people falling below certain BMI cut-offs; a more comprehensive assessment could provide a more accurate assessment of need [60].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60] Chao, 2022, Clinical Insight on Semaglutide for Chronic Weight Management in Adults: Patient Selection and Special Considerations, Drug Des. Dev. Ther. source

      The Insurance Coverage/Cost section identifies insurance coverage as a substantial barrier to semaglutide use. The Introduction gives BMI thresholds for medication candidacy and recommends personalized treatment decisions, but the paper does not say that insurers deny coverage below those thresholds or that a more comprehensive assessment would more accurately establish need. No page numbers were provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Alternative metrics such as waist-to-hip ratio or waist-to-height ratio in addition to BMI could offer a more comprehensive assessment of body composition and associated health risks in diverse populations.

    “Exploring alternative metrics such as waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) or waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) in addition to BMI could offer a more comprehensive assessment of body composition and associated health risks in diverse populations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] Carvalho, V., Moreira, L.B., Luft, V.C., and Fuchs, S.C. (2023). Waist-to-Height Ratio: A Sensitive Tool for Assessing the Need for Nutritional Risk Management in Elderly Populations from Brazil. Healthcare, 11. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The relationship between BMI and percent body fat is highly variable by race, ethnicity, sex, and age, and these factors may interact.

    “Apart from genetic factors, the relationship between BMI and percent body fat is highly variable by race, ethnicity, sex, and age (acknowledging that these simple constructs may mask more complex social elements), and these factors may interact [21].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Yang, 2015, Genetic variance estimation with imputed variants finds negligible missing heritability for human height and body mass index, Nat. Genet. source

      The Online Methods describe adjusting BMI for age and standardizing it within sex groups, but do not examine percent body fat. Searches for the BMI–percent-body-fat relationship and for variation by race, ethnicity, sex, age, or their interactions found no passage addressing the attributed claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    BMI is used to screen for macro-nutritional status, whether undernutrition, normal range, or overnutrition.

    “Body mass index (BMI) is used to screen for macro-nutritional status, whether undernutrition, normal range, or overnutrition [1].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Eknoyan, 2008, Adolphe Quetelet (1796–1874)—The average man and indices of obesity, Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    BMI was devised by Adolphe Quetelet in the 1830s to enable comparison of White middle-aged European men of varying heights via a common parameter.

    “An individual’s weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared was devised by Adolphe Quetelet, a Belgian mathematician, in the 1830s to enable the comparison of White middle-aged European men of varying heights via a common parameter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Eknoyan, 2008, Adolphe Quetelet (1796–1874)—The average man and indices of obesity, Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The American Medical Association issued a report and policy recommendation in June 2023 urging medical professionals to do more comprehensive assessments of overweight and rely less on BMI.

    “The American Medical Association (AMA) issued a report and policy recommendation in June 2023 that urged medical professionals to do more comprehensive assessments of overweight and rely less on BMI [23,24].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] (2023, June 14). AMA Adopts New Policy Clarifying Role of BMI as a Measure in Medicine. Available online: https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-adopts-new-policy-clarifying-role-bmi-measure-medicine#:~:text=Under%20the%20newly%20adopted%20policy,of%20non%2DHispanic%20white%20populations.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] Tanne, 2023, Obesity: Avoid using BMI alone when evaluating patients, say US doctors’ leaders, BMJ source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Weight stigma affects people with obesity and can lead to delayed help-seeking, trouble finding social support, and impeded weight loss maintenance.

    “Such negative stereotypes because of body weight, better termed “weight stigma”, affect people with obesity; persons feeling ashamed or embarrassed may hesitate to seek timely professional help, may have trouble finding needed social support, and can impede weight loss maintenance [19].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Puhl, 2020, Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity, Am. Psychol. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BMI remains popular as a simple, inexpensive clinical screening tool in patient medical encounters, though its limitations for individual patient forecasting are well documented.

    “As a simple, inexpensive clinical screening tool, BMI remains popular in patient medical encounters, though its limitations for individual patient forecasting are well documented [12].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] (2021, May 05). Why BMI Is a Flawed Health Standard, Especially for People of Color. Available online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/wellness/healthy-bmi-obesity-race-/2021/05/04/655390f0-ad0d-11eb-acd3-24b44a57093a_story.html.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    BMI does not measure functional health and fitness but is merely an anthropometric measure.

    “BMI does not measure functional health and fitness but is merely an anthropometric measure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Four BMI categories are in common use today: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5-<25.0 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-<30.0 kg/m2), and obesity (≥30.0 kg/m2).

    “Four categories of BMI are in common use today to estimate patient conditions: (1) underweight or undernourished status (<18.5 kg/m2); (2) normal BMI (18.5–<25.0 kg/m2); (3) overweight status (25.0–<30.0 kg/m2); and (4) persons with obesity as ≥30.0 kg/m2 [2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] (2010, May 06). A Healthy Lifestyle—WHO Recommendations. Available online: https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/a-healthy-lifestyle---who-recommendations.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Overweight status is associated with an increased risk of depressive disorder among adults.

    “Overweight status is associated with an increased risk of depressive disorder among adults [18].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Luppino, 2010, Overweight, obesity, and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Among adults, BMI has been used to assess overweight status independent of age or sex, though its cut-offs for the elderly are debated.

    “Among adults, BMI has been used to assess overweight status independent of age or sex [28], though its cut-offs for the elderly are debated [30].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [28] (2024, March 01). Obesity and Overweight. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [30] Liu, 2023, Deciphering the “obesity paradox” in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sarcopenic obesity, Obes. Rev. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    BMI estimates adiposity crudely because muscles and bones have a higher density than fat, and some fat dispositions are worse than others.

    “BMI estimates adiposity crudely, given that muscles and bones have a higher density than fat (adipose tissue), and some fat dispositions are worse than others, as with abdominal adiposity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Persons pursuing weight loss through diet and exercise can use BMI as an anchor assessment and track weight over time because height in adults is stable over the short term.

    “Persons pursuing a weight loss plan through diet and exercise can use BMI as the anchor assessment and calculate weight goals with assistance from a primary care provider, enabling them to simply track weight over time since height in adults is stable over the short term [27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] (2011, August 02). Body Mass Index: Considerations for Practitioners, Available online: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/25368.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    BMI has substantial utility in population-level statistics, summarizing current burdens of under- or over-nutrition and assessing trends in communities.

    “BMI has substantial utility in population-level statistics, summarizing current burdens of under- or over-nutrition and assessing trends in communities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Commission in 2023 highlighted caveats in the definition and diagnosis of obesity.

    “In their 2023 report, The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Commission highlighted similar caveats in the context of the definition and diagnosis of obesity [25].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Rubino, 2023, Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology Commission on the Definition and Diagnosis of Clinical Obesity, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Polynesian body habitus may also differ, such that different cut-offs are appropriate.

    “Polynesian body habitus may also differ, such that different cut-offs are appropriate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In HIV-infected breastfeeding South African mothers, BIS provided valid measures of fat-free mass, whereas BMI was helpful only in predicting fat mass.

    “BIS in HIV-infected breastfeeding South African mothers provided valid measures of fat-free mass, whereas BMI was helpful only in predicting fat mass [63].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] Papathakis, 2005, Comparison of isotope dilution with bioimpedance spectroscopy and anthropometry for assessment of body composition in asymptomatic HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected breastfeeding mothers, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Even with different cut-offs, changes over time may be valid for tracking changes within individuals and summarizing population trends.

    “However, even with different cut-offs, changes over time may be valid for tracking changes within individuals and summarizing population trends.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    For the same BMI, females have a higher percent of fat than males, and for similar fat-free body mass, Black women had significantly more percent of fat and a higher body weight than White women.

    “For example, for the same BMI, females have a higher percent of fat than males, and for similar fat-free body mass, Black women had significantly more percent of fat and, hence, a higher body weight than White women [54].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54] Jackson, 2002, The effect of sex, age and race on estimating percentage body fat from body mass index: The Heritage Family Study, Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Young Indians living in India have more visceral and abdominal fat and reduced glucose disposal rates than Caucasians with matched age and BMI.

    “Young Indians living in India were found to have more visceral and abdominal fat and reduced glucose disposal rates than Caucasians with matched age and BMI [40].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Raji, 2001, Body Fat Distribution and Insulin Resistance in Healthy Asian Indians and Caucasians, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cross-sectional imaging can illustrate longitudinal changes in a single individual's body composition, but it is harder to interpret imaging for comparative predictions for groups of people.

    “Though cross-sectional imaging can illustrate longitudinal changes in a single individual’s body composition, it is harder to interpret imaging for comparative predictions for groups of people [66].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [66] MacDonald, 2011, The advantages and limitations of cross-sectional body composition analysis, Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Implementing the proposed recommendations can significantly improve the effectiveness of anthropometry in assessing population health and guiding clinical care.

    “Implementing these recommendations can significantly improve the effectiveness of anthropometry in assessing population health and guiding clinical care.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BMI will continue to be a simple and convenient tool for assessing macro-nutrition at the population level, though it does not measure micronutrients.

    “BMI will continue to be a simple and convenient tool for assessing macro-nutrition at the population level, recognizing, of course, that BMI does not measure micronutrients [55].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [55] Vermund, S., Scott, M., and Humphries, D. (2021). Public Health and Clinical Implications of Nutrition-Infection Interactions. Nutrition and Infectious Diseases Shifting the Clinical Paradigm: Shifting the Clinical Paradigm, Humana Press/Springer Nature Switzerland AG. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Healthcare inequities are evident when one considers the cost and availability of advanced diagnostics in lower-resource settings.

    “Healthcare inequities are evident when one considers the cost and availability of advanced diagnostics in lower-resource settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The obesity crisis or progress in reducing undernutrition cannot be assessed by BMI alone.

    “The obesity crisis or progress in reducing undernutrition cannot be assessed by BMI alone; however, the global rise in obesity and decline in underweight are attributed to a shift in the population distribution of BMI, and this can mask social inequity both within and across populations [63].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio are relatively simple, low-cost measures that can better evaluate adiposity instead of an exclusive focus on excess weight.

    “These measures are also relatively simple in the hands of trained practitioners and are low-cost; they can better evaluate adiposity instead of an exclusive focus on excess weight.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    More extreme BMI findings have a high predictive utility for obesity-related medical conditions, as well as for undernutrition and cachexia.

    “More extreme BMI findings have a high predictive utility for obesity-related medical conditions, as well as for undernutrition and cachexia.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Semaglutide mimics the GLP-1 hormone released in the gastrointestinal tract with food challenges, stimulating more insulin production, reducing blood glucose, and promoting satiety sensations and appetite suppression.

    “Work-to-date suggests that semaglutide mimics the GLP-1 hormone released in the gastrointestinal tract with food challenges, stimulating more insulin production, reducing blood glucose, and promoting satiety sensations and appetite suppression [59].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59] Phillips, 2022, Clinical review of subcutaneous semaglutide for obesity, J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bariatric surgery may be restricted to patients with a high BMI, and a more objective assessment such as co-incident type 2 diabetes could address the limitations of using BMI eligibility criteria alone.

    “In healthcare systems, bariatric surgery may be restricted to patients with a high BMI (e.g., >35 kg/m2); a more objective assessment (co-incident type 2 diabetes, for example) could address the limitations of using BMI eligibility criteria alone [12].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] (2021, May 05). Why BMI Is a Flawed Health Standard, Especially for People of Color. Available online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/wellness/healthy-bmi-obesity-race-/2021/05/04/655390f0-ad0d-11eb-acd3-24b44a57093a_story.html.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    BMI is helpful when it is used as a screening test and population-appropriate cut-offs are used.

    “The BMI is helpful when it is used as a screening test and population-appropriate cut-offs are used.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Genetic factors play a significant role in obesity predisposition and response to weight management, and variations in genes related to metabolism, appetite regulation, and fat storage influence obesity susceptibility.

    “Genetic factors play a significant role in obesity predisposition and response to weight management. Variations in genes related to metabolism, appetite regulation, and fat storage influence obesity susceptibility [42].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Tirthani, E., Said, M.S., and Rehman, A. (2024). Genetics and Obesity. StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    3DPS, PET, and SPECT are comparatively costly and complex imaging tools that assess adiposity and some physiological functions.

    “Three-dimensional photonic scanning (3DPS), positron emission tomography (PET), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are comparatively costly and complex imaging tools that assess adiposity and some physiological functions [67].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67] Santhanam, 2021, A systematic review of imaging studies of human brown adipose tissue, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Waist circumference assesses abdominal fat, with elevated values associated with a higher risk of metabolic diseases.

    “Similarly, waist circumference, also measured with a tape measure, assesses abdominal fat, with elevated values associated with a higher risk of metabolic diseases [69].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [69] Chan, 2003, Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as predictors of adipose tissue compartments in men, QJM source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While BMI remains a cornerstone of public health surveillance and screening efforts, its limitations necessitate embracing emerging technologies and adopting a multifaceted approach to body composition assessment to better address the diverse needs of populations worldwide.

    “While BMI remains a cornerstone of public health surveillance and screening efforts, its limitations necessitate the embracing of emerging technologies and adopting a multifaceted approach to body composition assessment to better address the diverse needs of populations worldwide.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Radiation exposure in both DXA and CT is a disadvantage.
    • Rests on an assumption: MRI requires one to be stable in a loud and noisy environment for a long time, which can be costly, tiring, and disruptive for patients, particularly those with claustrophobia.
    • Rests on an assumption: Waist-to-hip ratio indicates fat distribution and serves as a reliable predictor of cardiovascular risk.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Medical evaluations with greater predictive value need accurate measures and a definitive diagnosis of harmful adiposity, as well as functional assessments.

    “Medical evaluations with greater predictive value need accurate measures and a definitive diagnosis of harmful adiposity, as well as functional assessments; such assessments encounter health system constraints of accessibility and affordability [64].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Advances in data sciences and artificial intelligence may help address guideline discrepancies by refining criteria and cut-offs by key relevant cofactors like race, ethnicity, sex, age, and fitness.

    “Advances in data sciences and artificial intelligence may help address guideline discrepancies by refining criteria and cut-offs by key relevant cofactors like race, ethnicity, sex, age, and fitness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Simple, point-of-care assessment tools to better assess macro-nutritional status could supplant BMI as a screening tool of choice, but these are not yet affordable and/or validated.

    “Simple, point-of-care assessment tools to better assess macro-nutritional status could supplant BMI as a screening tool of choice, but these are not yet affordable and/or validated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Lean body mass is essential for evaluating muscle health and overall metabolic function.

    “Lean body mass, essential for evaluating muscle health and overall metabolic function, measures the body’s mass excluding fat and can be assessed through DEXA scans, hydrostatic weighing, and bioelectrical impedance analysis [70].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] Roubenoff, 1991, The meaning and measurement of lean body mass, Nutr. Rev. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    Developing algorithms that integrate multiple data points can help healthcare providers tailor interventions and treatment plans more effectively to address obesity and its associated health risks.

    “Developing algorithms that integrate multiple data points can help healthcare providers tailor interventions and treatment plans more effectively to address obesity and its associated health risks [66].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [66] MacDonald, 2011, The advantages and limitations of cross-sectional body composition analysis, Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Leveraging data science and artificial intelligence to analyze interactions between body composition metrics and blood-derived variables can enhance the accuracy and predictive power of the innovative approach.

    “Leveraging data science and artificial intelligence to analyze the complex interactions between body composition metrics and blood-derived variables can enhance the accuracy and predictive power of this innovative approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Workforce issues, including the need for skilled practitioners, test risks, and costs, determine the extent to which more complex approaches are useful in specific settings.

    “Workforce issues must be considered in such optimization efforts, as the need for skilled practitioners, test risks, and costs are all factors that determine the extent to which more complex approaches are useful in specific settings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Comparing BMI screening test efficiencies and population-specific predictive values may improve combinations of screening, diagnostic, and predictive tools, with BMI as a likely component of efficient algorithms.

    “Such work may improve the specific combinations of screening, diagnostic, and predictive tools, with BMI as a likely component of efficient algorithms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
55 of 55
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Radiation exposure in both DXA and CT is a disadvantage.

    “Radiation exposure in both DXA and CT is a disadvantage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    MRI requires one to be stable in a loud and noisy environment for a long time, which can be costly, tiring, and disruptive for patients, particularly those with claustrophobia.

    “Although MRI does not involve ionizing radiation, it requires one to be stable in a loud and noisy environment for a long time, which can be costly, tiring, and disruptive for patients, particularly those with claustrophobia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Waist-to-hip ratio indicates fat distribution and serves as a reliable predictor of cardiovascular risk.

    “The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), determined using a simple tape measure, indicates fat distribution and serves as a reliable predictor of cardiovascular risk.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • AMA report quotation cites a depression review

    Minor

    The quotation attributed to the 2023 AMA report cites reference 18, but reference 18 is a 2010 review about overweight, obesity, and depression, not an AMA report.

  • Review claims a 2023 literature cutoff but cites 2024 publications

    Minor

    The abstract says the review covers publications through 2023, but the references include publications dated 2024, including reference 57, which is discussed in the text.

  • WHO obesity threshold excludes versus includes BMI 30

    Minor

    The prose defines the WHO obesity threshold as greater than 30 kg/m2, while Table 1 defines it as at least 30 kg/m2. These classify a BMI of exactly 30 differently.

  • Indian BMI thresholds disagree at 23 and 25

    Minor

    The prose excludes BMI 23 from overweight and BMI 25 from obesity, whereas Table 1 includes those respective boundary values.

  • Chinese overweight threshold excludes versus includes BMI 24

    Minor

    The prose says the Chinese overweight threshold is above 24 kg/m2, but Table 1 includes 24 kg/m2 in the overweight range.

5 of 5

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. (2023, June 14). AMA Adopts New Policy Clarifying Role of BMI as a Measure in Medicine. Available online: https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-adopts-new-policy-clarifying-role-bmi-measure-medicine#:~:text=Under%20the%20newly%20adopted%20policy,of%20non%2DHispanic%20white%20populations.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, Y., Li, D., & Vermund, S. H.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Vermund, Sten H.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-06-10
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
757
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399491352
Cited by
332
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 168 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 16
FWCI
77.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
body mass index, adult obesity, obesity screening, anthropometry, body composition, physical fitness, chronic disease risk prediction, semaglutide, obesity diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Obesity, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review