Cited by 252Health, psychology, and well-beingCardiac Health and Mental HealthHealth disparities and outcomes

Sense of Coherence and Mortality in Men and Women in the EPIC-Norfolk United Kingdom Prospective Cohort Study

Surtees, P.·2003·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that a personality disposition defined by a strong sense of coherence is associated with a reduced risk of mortality. The authors prospectively examined, for < or =6 years, the relation between a strong sense of coherence and mortality due to all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer among 20,579 participants aged 41-80 years from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk Study in the United Kingdom. Data were collected in 1996-2002. Participants were recruited by post from general practice age-sex registers and subsequently completed a postal assessment of their sense of coherence. During follow-up, 1,024 deaths were recorded. A strong sense of coherence was associated with a 30% reduction in mortality from all causes (rate ratio=0.69, p<0.0001), cardiovascular disease (rate ratio=0.70, p=0.001), and cancer (rate ratio=0.74, p=0.003), independent of age, sex, and prevalent chronic disease. These associations were consistent by sex, except that no association was observed for cancer mortality in women. The association for all-cause mortality remained after adjustment for cigarette smoking history, social class, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, hostility, and neuroticism (rate ratio=0.76, p=0.002). Results suggest that a strong sense of coherence may confer some resilience to the risk of chronic disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwg272

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Surtees, P.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Surtees, P.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2003-12-15
Volume
158
Issue
12
Pages
1202-1209
ISSN
0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101075322
Cited by
252
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
25.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
sense of coherence, mortality, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cancer mortality, personality, sex differences, EPIC-Norfolk cohort, chronic disease risk, resilience
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Personality, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review