Cited by 285Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Hostility, Incidence of Acute Myocardial Infarction, and Mortality in a Sample of Older Danish Men and Women

Barefoot, John C., Larsen, Svend, von der Lieth, Lars, Schroll, Marianne·1995·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

An abbreviated version of the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (ACM) was a predictor of documented acute myocardial infarction and total mortality. The sample consisted of 409 men and 321 women, residents of Glostrup, Denmark, who were 50 years old at the initiation of the study in 1964. Follow-up continued through 1991. Although not significant (relative risk (RR) = 1.22) in a model that contained only age and sex as covariates, the hostility scale scores were associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction in models controlling for traditional risk factors. A two standard deviation difference was associated with a RR of 1.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-2.25), an effect that remained after eliminating the data of those with signs of ischemia at baseline. Hostility was also predictive of total mortality with controls for age and sex (RR = 1.35, CI 1.07-1.71), with controls for traditional risk factors (RR = 1.44, CI 1.13-1.83), and with additional controls for baseline ischemia and pulmonary function (RR = 1.36, CI 1.06-1.75). There were no sex differences in effect sizes. In cross-sectional analyses, high hostility was associated with higher body mass index, more physical activity at work, and poorer pulmonary function. These results constitute a rigorous test of the relation between hostility and health and increase the known generality of the phenomenon across sexes, age groups, and cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117663

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barefoot, J. C., Larsen, S., von der Lieth, L., & Schroll, M.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Glostrup Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Barefoot, John C.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1995-09-01
Volume
142
Issue
5
Pages
477-484
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W1875975445
Cited by
285
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5f06tw001952-03, 5r01ag009276-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG09276)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 36587, P01HL036587)
  • Fogarty International Center (F06 TW01952-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
hostility, acute myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, older adults, sex differences, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, lung function, body mass index, physical activity, ischemia, cross-cultural generalizability
MeSH terms
Cause of Death, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denmark, Female, Hostility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, MMPI, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review