Cited by 780Nutritional Studies and DietCancer Risks and FactorsGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of Cancer.

Open access
Day, N, Oakes, S, Luben, R, Khaw, KT, Bingham, S, Welch, A, Wareham, N·1999·Nature

Abstract

The European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC) was initiated in 1989 in order to define more clearly the relationship between diet and the risk of developing cancer at a range of sites (Riboli, 1992). The hypothesis that diet might be responsible for a substantial proportion of total cancer incidence was widely publicized by a report in the early 1980s (Doll, 1981) which suggested that 30% of cancer in the USA might be preventable by dietary modification. However, the uncertainty bounds around the estimate of 30% were acknowledged to be wide, and no association between a specific dietary constituent and risk for a specific cancer type was considered conclusively established. Since then, evidence has continued to accrue supporting the general association between diet and cancer, but two recently published comprehensive reviews only found sufficient evidence for a few specific relationships (World Cancer Research Fund, 1997; Department of Health. 1998). The most convincing evidence is for a protective role for fruit and vegetables for a number of cancers, including oesophagus, stomach, large bowel, lung and breast. It is not clear, however, that the same food constituents are involved for each cancer, nor even that the same type of fruit and vegetable are implicated. The rationale for EPIC was that in order to generate data which improved the definition of diet-cancer associations, studies had to be prospective, large-scale and based on populations with wide variation both in diet and in cancer incidence. In addition, studies had to use improved methods for dietary assessment including biological markers. EPIC comprises cohorts established in France, Germany, Greece, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain and the UK, with associated cohorts in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Recruitment of these cohorts with baseline data and biological samples is now almost complete (as shown in Table 1), achieving the target set earlier (Riboli, 1992). As an example of the range in cancer rates seen across the populations participating in EPIC, Figure 1 shows mortality rates for breast cancer. The study in Norfolk was initially planned as a diet and cancer cohort and later joined as a collaborative component cohort of EPIC. It has now, however, broadened its scope to include end points other than cancer, and exposures other than diet. The intention now is to investigate the majority of causes of disability and death in middle and later life, and to include additional lifestyle exposures, notably exercise, physical activity and psychosocial variables.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.17863/cam.89388

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Day, N., Oakes, S., Luben, R., Khaw, K., Bingham, S., Welch, A., & Wareham, N.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Nature
Published
1999-07
Volume
80 Suppl 1
Pages
95-103
OpenAlex
W84894356
Cited by
780
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 30
FWCI
9.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
EPIC-Norfolk cohort, diet and cancer, cancer incidence, fruit and vegetable intake, dietary assessment, biomarkers, breast cancer mortality, lifestyle exposures, physical activity, psychosocial factors
MeSH terms
Aged, Diet, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Research Design, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review