Cited by 84Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchNutritional Studies and DietMeat and Animal Product Quality

Prospective study of cured meats consumption and risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in men

Open access
Varraso, R., Jiang, R., Barr, R. G., Willett, W. C., Camargo, C. A.·2007·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Cured meats are high in nitrites. Nitrites generate reactive nitrogen species that may cause damage to the lung. The objective is to assess the relation between frequent consumption of cured meats and the risk of newly diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Between 1986 and 1998, the authors identified 111 self-reported cases of newly diagnosed COPD among 42,915 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. The cumulative average intake of cured meats consumption (processed meats, bacon, hot dogs) was calculated from food frequency questionnaires administrated in 1986, 1990, and 1994 and divided according to servings per week (never/almost never, <1 serving/week, 1-3 servings/week, 4-6 servings/week, at least once/day). After adjustment for age, smoking status, pack-years, pack-years squared, energy intake, race/ethnicity, US region, body mass index, and physical activity, the consumption of cured meats was positively associated with the risk of newly diagnosed COPD (for highest vs. lowest intake: relative risk = 2.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.39, 5.00; p(trend) = 0.002). In contrast to these findings, the consumption of cured meats was not associated with the risk of adult-onset asthma. These data suggest that cured meat may worsen the adverse effects of smoking on risk of COPD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwm235

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because cured meats such as bacon, sausage, and ham contain high doses of nitrite for preservation, antimicrobial, and color fixation, epidemiological studies have demonstrated that consumption of cured meats is positively linked to the risk of newly diagnosed COPD.

    “Because cured meats such as bacon, sausage and ham contain high doses of nitrite for preservation, antimicrobial and color fixation, epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the consumption of cured meats is positively linked to the risk of newly diagnosed COPD [109,110,111].”

    From NO-Rich Diet for Lifestyle-Related Diseases (2015) · cites this paper as [111]

  • Nitrite generates reactive nitrogen species, which may cause nitrosative damage to the lungs, eventually leading to structural changes like emphysema.

    “Nitrite generates reactive nitrogen species, which may cause nitrosative damage to the lungs, eventually leading to structural changes like emphysema [111].”

    From NO-Rich Diet for Lifestyle-Related Diseases (2015) · cites this paper as [111]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jiang R, Paik DC, Hankinson J, et al. Consumption of cured meats, lung function and chronic obstructive pulmonary dis- ease among US adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175: 798-804.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varraso, R., Jiang, R., Barr, R. G., Willett, W. C., & Camargo, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2007-09-06
Volume
166
Issue
12
Pages
1438-1445
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2106060081
Cited by
84
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA55075)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL60712, R01HL060712, RC1HL100543)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-55075, P01CA055075)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK040561)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
Keywords
cured meat, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nitrite, processed meat, bacon, hot dogs, smoking, adult-onset asthma, lung cancer risk, men, dietary intake
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diet, Food Preservation, Humans, Life Style, Male, Meat Products, Middle Aged, Nitrites, Phenotype, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, United States, Body Mass Index, Chi-Square Distribution, Proportional Hazards Models, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review