Cited by 113Reproductive Health and ContraceptionHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Timing clinic visits to phases of the menstrual cycle by using a fertility monitor: the BioCycle Study

Open access
Howards, P. P., Schisterman, E. F., Wactawski-Wende, J., Reschke, J. E., Frazer, A. A., Hovey, K. M.·2008·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Planning study visits during specific menstrual cycle phases is important if the exposure or outcome is influenced by hormonal variation. However, hormone profiles differ across cycles and across women. The value of using fertility monitors to time clinic visits was evaluated in the BioCycle Study (2005-2007). Women aged 18-44 years (mean, 27.4) with self-reported menstrual cycle lengths of 21-35 days were recruited in Buffalo, New York, for 2 cycles (n = 250). Participants were provided with home fertility monitors that measured urinary estrone-3-glucuronide and luteinizing hormone (LH). The women were instructed to visit the clinic for a blood draw when the monitor indicated an LH surge. The monitor recorded a surge during 76% of the first cycles and 78% of the second cycles. Scheduling visits by using set cycle days or algorithms based on cycle length, such as a midcycle window or a window determined by assuming a fixed luteal phase length, would be simpler. However, even with perfect attendance in a 3-day window, these methods would have performed poorly, capturing the monitor-detected LH surge only 37%-57% of the time. Fertility monitors appear to be useful in timing clinic visits in a compliant population with flexible schedules.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwn287

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howards, P. P., Schisterman, E. F., Wactawski-Wende, J., Reschke, J. E., Frazer, A. A., & Hovey, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2008-10-08
Volume
169
Issue
1
Pages
105-112
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2144448463
Cited by
113
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH0014367067)
  • University at Buffalo
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
menstrual cycle phases, luteinizing hormone surge, home monitoring, luteal phase length, cycle length
MeSH terms
Adult, Data Collection, Estradiol, Estrone, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Maryland, Menstrual Cycle, Office Visits, Ovulation Detection, Progesterone, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, United States, Biomarkers, Fertile Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review