Cited by 111Nutritional Studies and DietFood composition and propertiesMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of cancer: a prospective cohort study

Open access
George, S. M., Mayne, S. T., Leitzmann, M. F., Park, Y., Schatzkin, A., Flood, A., Hollenbeck, A., Subar, A. F.·2008·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Previous studies have provided limited evidence for a harmful effect of high glycemic index and dietary glycemic load on cancer. The authors analyzed associations among glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of cancer in women and men in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. Published glycemic index values were assigned to 225 foods/food groups. Glycemic load was calculated by multiplying the glycemic index, carbohydrate content, and intake frequency of individual foods reported on a food frequency questionnaire. From 1995 through 2003, the authors identified 15,215 and 33,203 cancer cases in women and men, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate multivariate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. For women and men, respectively, the relative risks for total cancer for high versus low glycemic index were 1.03 (P(trend)=0.217) and 1.04 (P(trend)=0.012) and, for glycemic load, were 0.90 (P(trend)=0.024) and 0.93 (P(trend)=0.01). Associations with total cancer held only among the overweight for glycemic index and among those of healthy weight for glycemic load. These findings suggest that glycemic index and glycemic load are not strong predictors of cancer incidence. The direction and small magnitude of associations might be explained by the manner in which high glycemic index and glycemic load track with overall diet and lifestyle patterns.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwn347

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence of associations between high glycemic index/load diets and cancer risk is mixed.

    “However, evidence of their associations with cancer risk is mixed (28,34,35).”

    From Diabetes and Cancer (2010) · cites this paper as [35]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Wilson S, Jones L, Coussens C, et al, eds. Cancer and the Environment: Gene-Environment Interaction. Roundtable on Environment Health Sciences, Research, and Medicine, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
  2. Michaud DS, Midthune D, Hermansen S, et al. Comparison of cancer registry case ascertainment with SEER estimates and self-reporting in a subset of the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. J Regist Manag. 2005;32:70-75.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, S. M., Mayne, S. T., Leitzmann, M. F., Park, Y., Schatzkin, A., Flood, A., Hollenbeck, A., & Subar, A. F.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • AARP (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2008-12-13
Volume
169
Issue
4
Pages
462-472
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2095788184
Cited by
111
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • U.S. Department of State
  • Arizona Department of Health Services
  • Texas Department of State Health Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (Z01CP010196)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, cancer risk, cancer incidence, overweight, body weight, AARP Diet and Health Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Body Weight, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Retirement, Risk Factors, United States, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models, SEER Program, Glycemic Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review