Cited by 187Health disparities and outcomesPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHealth and Well-being Studies

On the reciprocal association between loneliness and subjective well-being

Open access
VanderWeele, T. J., Hawkley, L. C., Cacioppo, J. T.·2012·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Loneliness has been shown to longitudinally predict subjective well-being. The authors used data from a longitudinal population-based study (2002-2006) of non-Hispanic white, African-American, and nonblack Latino-American persons born between 1935 and 1952 and living in Cook County, Illinois. They applied marginal structural models for time-varying exposures to examine the magnitude and persistence of the effects of loneliness on subjective well-being and of subjective well-being on loneliness. Their results indicate that, if interventions on loneliness were made 1 and 2 years prior to assessing final subjective well-being, then only the intervention 1 year prior would have an effect (standardized effect = -0.29). In contrast, increases in subjective well-being 1 year prior (standardized effect = -0.26) and 2 years prior (standardized effect = -0.13) to assessing final loneliness would both have an effect on an individual's final loneliness. These effects persist even after control is made for depressive symptoms, social support, and psychiatric conditions and medications as time-varying confounders. Results from this study indicate an asymmetrical and persistent feedback of fairly substantial magnitude between loneliness and subjective well-being. Mechanisms responsible for the asymmetry are discussed. Developing interventions for loneliness and subjective well-being could have substantial psychological and health benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kws173

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A similar reciprocal effect has been found between loneliness and subjective well-being in old age.

    “A similar effect has been found between loneliness and subjective well-being in old age (VanderWeele et al. 2012).”

    From Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review (2017) · cites this paper as VanderWeele et al. 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cummins RA, Lau ALD, Davern M. Homeostatic Mechanisms and Subjective Well-Being. New York, NY: Springer; 2007.
  2. On the Loneliness-Subjective Well-being Association 783 Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176(9):777-784

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VanderWeele, T. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
VanderWeele, T. J.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2012-10-16
Volume
176
Issue
9
Pages
777-784
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2099729134
Cited by
187
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 RG999999)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG018911, R37AG033590, R01AG034052, AG033590)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES017876)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024999)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03HD060696)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
loneliness, subjective well-being, bidirectional relationship, feedback effects, longitudinal prediction, marginal structural models, time-varying confounding, depressive symptoms, social support, psychiatric conditions, loneliness interventions, older adults, African Americans, Hispanic Americans
MeSH terms
Aged, Black or African American, Depression, Female, Health Status, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Illinois, Loneliness, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, White People, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review