Cited by 62Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

Detectable Symptomatology Preceding the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer and Absolute Risk of Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis

Open access
Risch, H. A., Yu, H., Lu, L., Kidd, M. S.·2015·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The survival duration for pancreatic cancer is short. Given its low lifetime risk (1.5%), established factors for the disease have insufficient specificity to identify individuals at high risk of nonfamilial cancer, and prediagnostic signs and symptoms are vague and not limited to pancreatic causes. We considered whether statistical models that incorporated both risk factors and prediagnosis symptomatology could improve prediction enough to provide practical risk estimates. We combined US Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) incidence data from 2008 to 2010 with regression models from representative case-control data from Connecticut (2005-2009) to estimate age- and sex-specific 5-year absolute risks of pancreatic cancer diagnosis. Our risk model included current cigarette smoking (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1, 5.0), current use of proton pump-inhibitor antiheartburn medications (OR = 6.2, 95% CI: 1.7, 23), recent diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (OR = 4.8, 95% CI: 2.2, 11), recent diagnosis of pancreatitis (OR = 19, 95% CI: 3.1, 120), Jewish ancestry (OR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1, 3.1), and ABO blood group other than O (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.8). In total, 0.87% of controls with combinations of these factors had estimated 5-year absolute risks greater than 5%, and for some, the risks reached more than 10%. Combining risk factors for pancreatic cancer with detectable prediagnostic symptomatology can allow investigators to begin to identify small segments of the population with risks sufficiently high enough to make screening efforts among them potentially useful.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwv026

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An artificial neural network model using US National Health Interview Survey and PLCO Trial data reached an AUC of 0.85 and included age, sex, race and ethnicity, diabetes, emphysema, asthma, stroke, cardiovascular diseases, ulcers, other cancer, hypertension, smoking status, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and family history of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

    “This model reached an AUC of 0·85 and incorporated data on age, sex, race and ethnicity, diabetes, emphysema, asthma, stroke, cardiovascular diseases, ulcers, other cancer, hypertension, smoking status, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and family history of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [111]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Risch, H. A., Yu, H., Lu, L., & Kidd, M. S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Risch, H. A.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2015-06-06
Volume
182
Issue
1
Pages
26-34
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2146731218
Cited by
62
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca098870-06)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01 CA098870, 5R01CA098870)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, absolute risk estimation, risk prediction model, cigarette smoking, proton pump inhibitors, diabetes mellitus, pancreatitis, Jewish ancestry, ABO blood group system, cancer screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Connecticut, Humans, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Models, Statistical, Case-Control Studies, SEER Program, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review