Cited by 198Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyExercise and Physiological Responses

Does strength-promoting exercise confer unique health benefits? A pooled analysis of data on 11 population cohorts with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality endpoints

Open access
Stamatakis, Emmanuel, Lee, I -Min, Bennie, Jason, Freeston, Jonathan, Hamer, Mark, O’Donovan, Gary, Ding, Ding, Bauman, Adrian +1 more·2018·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Public health guidance includes recommendations to engage in strength-promoting exercise (SPE), but there is little evidence on its links with mortality. Using data from the Health Survey for England and the Scottish Health Survey from 1994-2008, we examined the associations between SPE (gym-based and own-body-weight strength activities) and all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease mortality. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression was used to examine the associations between SPE (any, low-/high-volume, and adherence to the SPE guideline (≥2 sessions/week)) and mortality. The core sample comprised 80,306 adults aged ≥30 years, corresponding to 5,763 any-cause deaths (736,463 person-years). Following exclusions for prevalent disease/events occurring in the first 24 months, participation in any SPE was favorably associated with all-cause (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69, 0.87) and cancer (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.86) mortality. Adhering only to the SPE guideline was associated with all-cause (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.94) and cancer (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.92) mortality; adhering only to the aerobic activity guideline (equivalent to 150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity activity) was associated with all-cause (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.90) and cardiovascular disease (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.90) mortality. Adherence to both guidelines was associated with all-cause (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.87) and cancer (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.98) mortality. Our results support promoting adherence to the strength exercise guidelines over and above the generic physical activity targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwx345

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational studies suggest that combined exercise provides somewhat larger risk reductions in developing clinical endpoints such as metabolic syndrome, hypercholesterolaemia, obesity, and CVD morbidity and mortality.

    “Observational studies also suggest that combined exercise provides somewhat larger (although generally not statistically different compared with either resistance or aerobic exercise alone) risk reductions in developing clinical endpoints such as metabolic syndrome,33 hypercholesterolaemia,34 obesity,35 and CVD morbidity and mortality.36–38”

    From Aerobic, resistance, or combined exercise training and cardiovascular risk profile in overweight or obese adults: the CardioRACE trial (2024) · cites this paper as [38]

    The 'Adherence to strength exercise and aerobic guidelines' results (p. 4) report lower CVD mortality with aerobic exercise alone and say an alternative analysis provided clearer evidence of lower CVD mortality among those meeting both guidelines. They do not establish that combined exercise produced a larger CVD risk reduction than either type alone. The study assessed CVD mortality, not CVD morbidity. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stamatakis, E., Lee, I. M., Bennie, J., Freeston, J., Hamer, M., O’Donovan, G., Ding, D., Bauman, A., & Mavros, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Stamatakis, Emmanuel
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2017-10-31
Volume
187
Issue
5
Pages
1102-1112
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2766901730
Cited by
198
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18
FWCI
13.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • National Health and Medicine Research Council
  • National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
resistance training, all-cause mortality, cancer mortality, cardiovascular mortality, physical activity guidelines, exercise adherence, gym-based exercise, aerobic exercise, Health Survey for England, Scottish Health Survey
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, England, Female, Health Promotion, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Population Surveillance, Scotland, Cohort Studies, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review