Cited by 397Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports and Physical Education Studies

Recommended physical activity and all cause and cause specific mortality in US adults: prospective cohort study

Open access
Zhao, Min, Veeranki, Sreenivas P, Magnussen, Costan G, Xi, Bo·2020·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association between recommended physical activity according to the 2018 physical activity guidelines for Americans and all cause and cause specific mortality using a nationally representative sample of US adults. Design: Population based cohort study. Setting: National Health Interview Survey (1997-2014) with linkage to the National Death Index records to 31 December 2015. Participants: 479 856 adults aged 18 years or older. Exposures: Participant self-reports of the amount of leisure time spent in aerobic physical activity and muscle strengthening activity each week were combined and categorised into four groups: insufficient activity, aerobic activity only, muscle strengthening only, and both aerobic and muscle strengthening activities according to the physical activity guidelines. Main outcome measures: All cause mortality and cause specific mortality (cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic lower respiratory tract diseases, accidents and injuries, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes mellitus, influenza and pneumonia, and nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, or nephrosis) obtained from the National Death Index records. Results: During a median follow-up of 8.75 years, 59 819 adults died from all causes, 13 509 from cardiovascular disease, 14 375 from cancer, 3188 from chronic lower respiratory tract diseases, 2477 from accidents and injuries, 1470 from Alzheimer’s disease, 1803 from diabetes mellitus, 1135 from influenza and pneumonia, and 1129 from nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, or nephrosis. Compared with those who did not meet the physical activity guidelines (n=268 193), those who engaged in recommended muscle strengthening activity (n=21 428; hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 0.94) or aerobic activity (n=113 851; 0.71, 0.69 to 0.72) were found to be at reduced risk of all cause mortality; and even larger survival benefits were found in those engaged in both activities (n=76 384; 0.60, 0.57 to 0.62). In addition, similar patterns were reported for cause specific mortality from cardiovascular disease, cancer, and chronic lower respiratory tract diseases. Conclusions: Adults who engage in leisure time aerobic and muscle strengthening activities at levels recommended by the 2018 physical activity guidelines for Americans show greatly reduced risk of all cause and cause specific mortality. These data suggest that the physical activity levels recommended in the guidelines are associated with important survival benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.m2031

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, M., Veeranki, S. P., Magnussen, C. G., & Xi, B.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Xi, Bo
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-07-01
Volume
370
Pages
m2031
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038506903
Cited by
397
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 12
FWCI
30.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Shandong University (20820IFYT 1902)
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia (100849)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
Keywords
all-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cancer mortality, muscle-strengthening activity, aerobic physical activity, leisure-time physical activity, adults, mortality risk reduction, United States adults, National Health Interview Survey, National Death Index linkage, diabetes mortality, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Respiratory Tract Diseases, United States, Exercise, Guideline Adherence, Risk Reduction Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review