Cited by 27Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Blood Pressure, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, and Incidences of Coronary Artery Disease and Ischemic Stroke in Japanese: The Suita Study

Open access
Tsukinoki, R., Okamura, T., Watanabe, M., Kokubo, Y., Higashiyama, A., Nishimura, K., Takegami, M., Murakami, Y. +2 more·2014·American Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) and ischemic stroke. However, the hazards of their coexistence are not fully understood in Asian populations. We investigated whether the relationship between BP and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes are modified by LDL-C level in a Japanese population. METHODS: Individuals aged 30-79 years (n = 5,151) were classified into 6 groups according to LDL-C levels (<140 and ≥140mg/dL or lipid medication) and BP levels (optimal BP, prehypertension, and hypertension; reference: low LDL-C and optimal BP). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated after adjusting for age, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. The effect modification of LDL-C on BP-CVD association was assessed using likelihood ratio tests. RESULTS: There were 264 CAD and 215 ischemic stroke events during 13 years of follow-up. With low LDL-C, the HRs of prehypertension and hypertension for CAD were 2.01 and 4.71, respectively. Similar trends of HRs were observed with high LDL-C (optimal BP = 2.09, prehypertension = 3.45, hypertension = 5.94). However, the HRs for ischemic stroke did not differ between normal and high LDL-C levels at the same BP level. The apparent effect modification of LDL-C was not observed in the BP-CVD association in either CAD (P = 0.48) or ischemic stroke (P = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: The HRs for CAD in prehypertensive and hypertensive groups were higher than those in the optimal BP group at the same LDL-C levels in a Japanese population; however, there was no statistical effect modification of LDL-C on the BP-CAD association.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajh/hpu059

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]26. World Health Organization. Document for Meeting of MONICA Principal Investigators. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1986. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsukinoki, R., Okamura, T., Watanabe, M., Kokubo, Y., Higashiyama, A., Nishimura, K., Takegami, M., Murakami, Y., Okayama, A., & Miyamoto, Y.
Affiliations
  • Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University (JP)
  • Keio University (JP)
  • National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP)
  • Hyogo Medical University (JP)
  • Shiga University of Medical Science (JP)
  • Japan Anti Tuberculosis Association (JP)
Venue
American Journal of Hypertension
Published
2014-04-08
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
1362-1369
ISSN
  • 0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7225
OpenAlex
W2167638950
Cited by
27
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, hypertension, prehypertension, effect modification, cardiovascular risk factors, Japanese population
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Brain Ischemia, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Hypertension, Japan, Life Style, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Incidence, Chi-Square Distribution, Likelihood Functions, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio, Stroke, Asian People, Dyslipidemias, Prehypertension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review