The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Applied Linguistics
Abstract
In this article a description is given of a model of the bilingual speaker. The model presented is based on Levelt's (1989) 'Speaking' model, which sketches a framework in which a number of (highly autonomous) information processing components are postulated. The main characteristics of the model are that it is incremental and parallel, and that lower level processing is more automatized than higher level processing. An attempt is made to adapt the Levelt model for bilingual processing. Given the firm empirical basis of the (monolingual) version of the model, it was intended to change the model as little as possible. It is concluded that the first component, the conceptualize is probably partly language-specific and partly language-independent. Further it is hypothesized that there are different formulators for each language, while there is one lexicon where lexical elements from different languages are stored together. The output of the formulators is sent to the articulator which makes use of a large set of non-language specific speech motor plans. The adapted version of Levelt's model appears to provide a good explanation of various aspects of language production, especially with respect to codeswitching and the storage and retrieval of lexical elements, and it may suggest a useful direction to take in future research on language processing in bilinguals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002 · Cited by 1,027
Ellis, R. (2009) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amp042 · Cited by 522
Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Second Language Fluency
Schmidt, R. (1992) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100011189 · Cited by 458
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN L1 FLUENCY AND L2 FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990015 · Cited by 289
The Psycholinguistics of the Output Hypothesis
de Bot, K. (1996) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01246.x · Cited by 236
Kahng, J. (2014) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12084 · Cited by 200
Zalbidea, J. (2017) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12389 · Cited by 144
Tavakoli, P., & Hunter, A.-M. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168817708462 · Cited by 96
Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Bilingualism and Multilingualism Research
Wei, L. (2012) · The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism · doi:10.1002/9781118332382.ch2 · Cited by 75
Kurland, J., & Falcon, M. (2011) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.3109/02699206.2011.565398 · Cited by 68
Zuniga, M., & Simard, D. (2019) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-018-9587-2 · Cited by 57
Chapter 1. The context for researching a processing perspective on task performance
Skehan, P. (2014) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.5.01ske · Cited by 39
How does learners’ L2 utterance fluency relate to their L1? A meta‐analysis
Gao, J., & Sun, P. P. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12493 · Cited by 18
The moderating role of L2 proficiency in the predictive power of L1 fluency on L2 utterance fluency
Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J. (2025) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/02655322241241851 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- BOT, K. D.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-03-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W4247610767
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.