CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 133

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dominance and Age in Bilingualism

Birdsong, D.·2014·Applied Linguistics
DOI 10.1093/applin/amu031
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present article examines the relationship between age and dominance in bilingual populations. Age in bilingualism is understood as the point in development at which second language (L2) acquisition begins and as the chronological age of users of two languages. Age of acquisition (AoA) is a factor in determining which of a bilingual's two languages is dominant and to what degree, and it, along with age of first language (L1) attrition, may be associated with shifts in dominance from the L1 to the L2. In turn, dominance and chronological age, independently and in interaction with lexical frequency, predict performance on naming tasks. The article also considers the relevance of critical-period accounts of the relationships of AoA and age of L1 attrition to L2 dominance, and of usage-based and cognitive-aging accounts of the roles of age and dominance in naming.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/amu031

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Alario, 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 36, 140, 10.3758/BF03195559 · DOI
  2. Altman, 2006, BMJ, 332, 1080, 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2008, DEMENTIA AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2, 242, 10.1590/S1980-57642009DN20400002 · DOI
  4. 2011, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 66, 229
  5. 2006, APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 27, 46
  6. 2009, LANGUAGE LEARNING, 59, 687, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00521.x · DOI
  7. 2000, APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 21, 365, 10.1017/S0142716400003040 · DOI
  8. Caldas, 2002, Applied Linguistics, 23, 490, 10.1093/applin/23.4.490 · DOI
  9. Gollan, 2007, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 13, 197
  10. Gollan, 2008, 58, 787, 10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001 · DOI
  11. 2012, BILINGUALISM LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 15, 594, 10.1017/S1366728911000332 · DOI
  12. 2004, 17, 31, 10.1016/S0911-6044(03)00052-6 · DOI
  13. 2013, Second Language Research, 29, 311, 10.1177/0267658312461497 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2004, PERCEPTUAL MOTOR SKILLS, 98, 739, 10.2466/pms.98.3.739-753 · DOI
  15. Kohnert, 1998, Brain and language, 65, 422, 10.1006/brln.1998.2001 · DOI
  16. Mohamed Zied, 2004, Brain and cognition, 54, 254, 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.036 · DOI
  17. 2011, LANGUAGE TEACHING, 44, 1, 10.1017/S0261444810000327 · DOI
  18. 1979, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 47, 324, 10.1080/00220973.1979.11011701 · DOI
  19. Pallier, 2003, Cerebral Cortex, 13, 155, 10.1093/cercor/13.2.155 · DOI
  20. 2014, TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 6, 5, 10.1111/tops.12078 · DOI
  21. 1980, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY HUMAN LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 23, 67
  22. 1997, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 19, 922, 10.1080/01688639708403773 · DOI
  23. 2014, Neuropsychology, 28, 238, 10.1037/neu0000014 · DOI
  24. 2007, The Clinical neuropsychologist, 21, 599

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Birdsong, D.
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2014-06-28
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
374-392
ISSN
  • 0142-6001
  • 1477-450X
DOI
10.1093/applin/amu031
Cited by
133
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review