Cited by 62Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Executive functions and the obsessive-compulsive disorder: on the importance of subclinical symptoms and other concomitant factors

Bedard, M.-J., Joyal, C. C., Godbout, L., Chantal, S.·2009·Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Abstract

Although reviews concerning the neuropsychology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) put great emphasis on impaired executive functioning, the overall conclusions are notoriously divergent. The main goal of the present study was to use a battery of neuropsychological tasks to assess nine cognitive domains with a special focus on executive functions in 40 patients with OCD. A secondary objective was to examine the relationships between clinical or demographic variables and neuropsychological performances. The third goal was to separate executive functions in more homogeneous components to verify whether specific impairment might be found in persons with OCD. Confirming the main hypothesis, few neuropsychological differences emerged between the OCD and healthy participants when concomitant factors were controlled. Moreover, subclinical symptoms appeared to play a different and independent role on the cognitive results. Future studies should include more specific tasks of lower-order executive functions among persons with OCD to confirm this possibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/arclin/acp052

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence from previous studies reaffirms that neither anxiety nor depression were likely to account for the observed results.

    “evidence from previous studies reaffirms that neither anxiety nor depression were likely to account for the observed results (Bedard et al., 2009)”

    From The profile of executive function in OCD hoarders and hoarding disorder (2014) · cites this paper as Bedard et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Bouvard, M., Sauteraud, A., Note, I., Bourgeois, M., Dirson, S., & Cottraux, J. (1992). E ´tude de validation et analyse factorielle de la version franc ¸aise de l'e ´chelle d'obsession compulsion de Yale Brown [Validation and factor analysis of the French version of the Yale -Brown obsessive compulsive scale]. Journal de The ´rapie Comportementale et Cognitive, 2, 18-22.
  3. Freeston, M. H., Ladouceur, R., Thibodeau, N., Gagnon, F., & Rhe ´aume, J. (1994). L'inventaire d'anxiete de Beck et proprie ´te ´s psychome ´triques [Beck Anxiety Inventory: Psychometric properties]. L'Encephale, 20 (1), 47-55.
  4. E ´ditions du centre de psychologie applique ´e [Center for applied psychology editions] (1996). Inventaire de De ´pression de Beck [Beck Depression Inventory] in Manuel of BDI-II (2nd ed.). Paris: Author.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bedard, M.-J., Joyal, C. C., Godbout, L., & Chantal, S.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
  • Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus (CA)
Venue
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2009-08-18
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
585-598
ISSN
  • 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-5843
OpenAlex
W2126018758
Cited by
62
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, executive function, subclinical symptoms, neuropsychological performance, cognitive domain
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Cognition, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Severity of Illness Index, Case-Control Studies, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review